EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 583 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 583 (2024) 01016 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 583, 2024
Innovative Technologies for Environmental Science and Energetics (ITESE-2024)
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 13
Section Geoinformatics, Mining Geology and Mineral Resources
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458301016
Published online 25 October 2024
  1. Adamopoulos E., Rinaudo F. (2021) Close-Range Sensing and Data Fusion for Built Heritage Inspection and Monitoring – A Review. Remote Sensing, 13(19): 1-32. doi:10.3390/rs13193936. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akristiniy V. A. (2019) The monitoring of technical condition of cultural heritage objects. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Topical Problems of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environmental Economics. EDP Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 91: 9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Babkina K.A., Kalugina E.I. (2019) Restoration methods for cultural heritage objects. Modern technologies in construction. Theory and practice. 1:111-116. [Google Scholar]
  4. Badenko V.L., Lytkin S.A., Lipatova A.A., Samsonova V.M. (2018) Information modeling of cultural heritage buildings using the laser scanning method. In: SPbPU Science Week. Materials of scientific conference with international participation. Institute of Civil Engineering. St. Petersburg, Russia, november 2018 p 25-127. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baran, Michal; Zuzik, Jozef, PhD. (2013) Establishing geodetic network for the restoration of a historic building. In: International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM; Sofia: Surveying Geology & Mining Ecology Management (SGEM) 2:159-166. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boochs F., Huxhagen U., Kraus K. (2008) Potential of high-precision measuring techniques for the monitoring of surfaces from heritage objects. Int. Workshop In-situ Monitoring of Monumental Surfaces, SWM08. Florence, Italy. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gayrabekov I.G. Pimshin I.Yu. Gayrabekov M-B.I., Gayrabekova.I. Shamsudinova K.S. Gagaeva Kh.R. Geodetic observations of the technical condition of the engineering structure. In: Horizons of Science: Materials Science and Metallurgy Grozny, Russia 2019, p 187-195 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gnezdilov D.V., Kapnina E.V., Martynyuk E.S. (2019). The problem of preservation, restoration and reconstruction of the world architectural heritage. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (eds) Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Construction and Architecture: Theory and Practice for the Innovation Development (CATPID), Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gryaznova E. (2019) Ensuring safe operation of buildings and structures In: E3S Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 97. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kholova N., Abdullaev R. (2021) Censuring the durability of foundations of buildings and structures. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. – IOP Publishing, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, June 2021, vol 5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Korgin A. V., Ermakov V. A., (2012) Automation of the formation and correction of calculation models in monitoring the technical condition of buildings and structures. Internet Bulletin of VolgGASU. 3(23):35-35. [Google Scholar]
  12. Labant S., Baran M., Zuzik J. (2016) Geodetic survey of the historic building and creating of a 3d model for the project purposes of the monument restoration. In: 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016. Аlbena, bulgaria, July 2016, p 329-336. [Google Scholar]
  13. Levoy M. et al. (2000) The digital Michelangelo project: 3D scanning of large statues. Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. Moscow, Russia p 131-144. [Google Scholar]
  14. Markiewicz, J., Tobiasz, A. (2019) Review of surveying devices for structural health monitoring of cultural heritage buildings. In: Abstracts of 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering, Kazan, Russia, 7-10 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mullodzhanova G.M., Isakov E.Kh (2022) Features of geodetic methods of monitoring monuments of architecture. J Economy and society. 6-2 (97): 597-602. [Google Scholar]
  16. Novoselov D.B. (2013) High-precision leveling by a digital leveler in low light conditions. J Geodesy and Cartography. 8:14-17. – ISSN 0016-7126 [Google Scholar]
  17. Orlov A.S., Rubtsova E.G., Shcheglov A.S. (2021) Estimation of the load-carrying capacity of the constructions of the cultural heritage object “the oldenburg’s complex. lovers bridge. 1900. Scientific journal of construction and architecture. 3(63):123-126. DOI: 10.36622/VSTU.2021.63.3.012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Petrovich D. (2021) Geodetic methods for documenting and modelling cultural heritage objects. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 15(6):885-896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Russian Federation (2002) Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On objects of cultural heritage (monuments of history and culture) of the people of the Russian Federation”, No 73-FL 25 June 2002, Moscow. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rubtsov I.V., Pyatnitskaya T.A. (2013) Purpose and modern methods of instrumental geodetic monitoring of monuments of civil architecture. J Bulletin of MGSU, Moscow, Russia, 5: 80-86. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sercan R. A. B., Ceren R. A. A. (2012) The applicability of the model three dimensional surveying for the protection of historical and cultural heritage: an example of province of Konya sille. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM. June 2012. p 1169-1176. [Google Scholar]
  22. Seryakova V.A., Fedulov A.A. (2016) Evaluation of objects of cultural heritage. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-obektov-kulturnogo-naslediya. Accessed 10 Dec 2022. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shashkin A. G., Shashkin V. A. (2021) Adjustment of requirements of regulatory documents about cultural heritage objects. Reconstruction and Restoration of Architectural Heritage 2021. CRC Press, July 2021 p. 290-296. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shahinyan Sh.Z. (2019) Application of modern geodetic methods to preserve architectural monuments. Balandinsky readings 14(1):99-102. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sheina S. G., Girya L. V., Burakova A. A., Gorskaya A. L. (2019) Methods of complex assessment of the state of architectural monuments. Construction and technogenic safety, 15(67): 7-13. [Google Scholar]
  26. Solnyshkova O. V., Karavaev A. A. (2015) Problems of topographical and geodetic support of restoration of architectural heritage objects. Tavrian scientific reviewer. 3-2: 60-62. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24897693. Accessed 10 Dec 2022. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tobiasz A. et al (2019). Review of methods for documentation, management, and sustainability of cultural heritage. Case study: Museum of King Jan III’s Palace at Wilanow. Sustainability, 11 (24): 2-42. doi:10.3390/su11247046. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ulyanova N.B. (2020) Issues of preservation of the cultural heritage of russia and its influence on the design of modern art and culture Scientific research and development. Socio-humanitarian research and technology. 9(2): 3-6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Varlamova L.D. (2014) Using geodetic methods to preserve cultural heritage objects. In: Modern problems of construction and life support: safety, quality, energy and resource saving. Collection of materials of the III All-Russian scientific-practical conference. North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov. Moscow, Russia p 462-468. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zilberova I. Y., Novoselova I. V., Mohsen A. (2021) Organizational and technological approaches to the construction and technical expertise of cultural heritage sites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. – IOP Publishing, february 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1083/1/012058. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.