EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 585 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 585 (2024) 08004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 585, 2024
5th International Conference on Environmental Design and Health (ICED2024)
Article Number 08004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Policy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458508004
Published online 07 November 2024
  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2020: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press.(2020) https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ Intergovernmental P [Google Scholar]
  2. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat (2018). https://www.ipbes.net/global-assessment-report- biodiversity-ecosystem-services [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Wu, Landscape Ecology, 25, 1-4 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. UN (United Nations), The Sustainable Development Goals Report, p. 64.(2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. Council of Europe., European landscapeconvention. Strasbourg, Council of Europe (2000) [Google Scholar]
  6. Council of Europe., 2008. CM/Rec 3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the guidelines for the implementation of the ELC (20008) [Google Scholar]
  7. AA.VV., 2015. Landscape Observatories in Europe II. In: Cassatella, C., Larcher, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the UNISCAPE En-Route International Seminar, UNISCAPE En-Route, a.I, n.I, Torino, Italy (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. AA.VV., Landscape Observatories in Europe II. In: Zanaica, T. (coord.), Proceedings of UNISCAPE En- Route International Seminar, UNISCAPE En-Route, vol 2, no 5, Amersfoort, Netherlands (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Larcher, C. Cassatella, Landscape Observatoriesin Europe: the Action Plan. UNISCAPE En-Route, a.I, n.I, 118 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Saraiva, I. Loupa-Ramos, F. Bernardo. Avaliar paisagens e sua identidade–Observatório(s) como resposta metodológica? In: Fidalgo, P. (coord.), Estudos de Paisagem, vol III. Instituto História Contemporânea da FCSH/Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, p 276–293 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Souza, Os Observatórios de Paisagem como uma plataforma de envolvimento da sociedade civil a longo prazo. Universidade do Porto, Dissertação Mestrado em Arquitetura Paisagista.(in English: Landscape Observatories as a platform for long-term civil society engagement. University of Porto, Master’s Dissertation in Landscape Architecture) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Freire, I. Joaquina Ramos, M. da Conceição Rego, Cultivating Continuity of the European Landscape, 15, 46 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Antrop, V. Van Eetvelde, Landscape perspectives: the holistic nature of landscape. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Galan, Cultivating Continuity of the European Landscape, Environ Hist, 15, 47 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Cassatella, F. Larcher, Landscape Observatories in Europe: The Action Plan. Uniscape En-Route. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Devecchi, Landscape Observatories in Italy: The State of the Art. University of Turin (2015) [Google Scholar]
  17. P. J. Veen, National Landscapes: A Dutch Landscape Observatory? Servicenet National (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. P. S. Martí, Sapere l’Europa, 6, 291 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. Observatori del Paisatge de Catalunya (Ed.)., El paisatge transfronterer de la Cerdanya. Un projecte de futur en comú Le paysage transfrontalier de la Cerdagne. Un projet d’avenir commune. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Larsson, Cultivating Continuity of the European Landscape, Environ Hist, 15, 48 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Sala, Regional and local participation and co- operation in implementing the European landscape convention. The experience of the landscape observatory of Catalonia. In: Raasakka, N., Sivonen, S. (Eds.), Northern landscapes. Implementation of the European landscape convention in the north CaloPe municipalities. Conference in Inari 7- 9.9.2011, Inari, Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Lapland (Reports 48), pp. 55–66.(2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Ternell, B. Lagerqvist, A. M. Nilsson, M. Sagastuy Klie, M. Berg, M. A. Bae Pedersen, S. Nemethy, A. Horvath, Z. Bene, C. Olah, B. Banne Gal, G. Molnar, B. Remenyik, Ecocycles, 9, 61 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. E. A. J. Luiten, R. Dijkstra, F. van Dongen., Advisory letter on the European Landscape Convention (ELC). RBM-20131220 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. G. J. van Herwaarden, Development of a National Landscape Observatory in the Netherlands. In: J. Galan Vivas, Finland aims at establishing a Finnish Landscape Observatory. In UNISCAPE en-route: International Conference on Landscape Observatories (Amersfort, The Netherlands, 9-10 February 2017, UNISCAPE En-Route; Vol. 2, No. 5. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Uzun, F. Dilek, G. Çetinkaya, F. Erduran, S. Açıksöz, Konya ili, Bozkır-Seydişehir-Ahırlı- Yalıhüyük ilçeleri ve Suğla Gölü mevkii peyzaj yönetimi, koruma ve planlaması [landscape management, protection, and planning project for Bozkir-Seydisehir-Ahirli-Yalihüyük Districts and Suğla Lake in Konya Province]. TC Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü Doğa Koruma Dairesi Başkanlığı. Ankara (2010) [Google Scholar]
  26. Ş. Şahin, H. Perçin, E. Kurum, O. Uzun, B. C. Bilgili, a. National Technical Guideline for Landscape Character Analysis and Assessment at the Regional and Sub-Regional (Provincial) Levels [In Turkish and English]. TÜBİTAK KAMAG 1007 Program PEYZAJ-44 Project No 109G074, An Outcome of the Project where Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, and Ministry of Forest and Water Affairs are the Beneficiary Institutions and Ankara University is the Coordinating Institution, 146 Pages, Ankara. (2014) https://kutuphane.tarimorman.gov.tr/vufind/Record/ 1179493 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ş. Şahin, H. Perçin, E. Kurum, Y. Memlük,b. Akarsu Koridorlarında Peyzaj Onarımı ve Doğaya YenidenKazandırma Teknik Kılavuzu [Technical Guide for Landscape Restoration and Reintroduction to Nature in River Corridors]. T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü adına BEL-DA BeldeProje ve Dan. Tic. Ltd. Şti., 154 sayfa, Ankara (2014) [Google Scholar]
  28. O. Uzun, H. Müderrisoğlu, Z. Demir, L. Kaya, P. Gültekin, S. Gündüz, Yeşilırmak Havzası Peyzaj Atlası [Landscape Atlas of Yeşilırmak Basin]. T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü adına AKS Planlama Mühendislik Limited Şirketi, 254 sayfa, Ankara (2015) [Google Scholar]
  29. Ş. Şahin,., Why is a National Landscape Observatory Necessary? What Should Its Scope Be? PEMAT (Landscape Architects Academic Community) 2019, Invited Speaker, Unpublished Paper, Kuşadası, Aydın (2019) [Google Scholar]
  30. Ş. Şahin, D. Doğan, H. Uyguçgil, A. Çabuk, Bir SiberCBS Uygulaması Olarak Peyzaj Bilgi Sistemi: Türkiye’deki Ilk Uygulama Olan Malatya Ili Pilot Alanı [Landscape Information System as A CyberGIS Application: Pilot Study of Malatya Province as its First Application in Turkey]. In: Öner Demirel, E., Güneş, E. (Eds.), Landscape researches II [In Turkish], p: 109-130, Livre de Lyon.(2022) [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Wang, A Cybergis Framework for the Synthesisof Cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and Spatial Analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 535 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. F. J. P. Gil, The Implementation of an Enterprise Geographical Information System to Support Cadastre and Expropriation Activities: The case of Ferbritas Cadastre Information System. Project Report Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in Geographical Information System and Science. Instituto Superior de Estatistica e Gestão de Informação da Universidade Nova de Lisboa.(2014) [Google Scholar]
  33. M. R. Evans, D. Oliver, K. Yang, X. Zhou, S. Shekhar, Enabling Spatial Big Data via CyberGIS: Challenges and Opportunities. To appear as a book chapter in CyberGIS: Fostering a New Wave of Geospatial Innovation and Discovery (Ed. S. Wang and M. Goodchild), (expected in 2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. Ş. Şahin, B. C. Bilgili, V. Müftüoğlu, Peyzaj Envanteri [Landscape Inventory]. Mülga T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı ve TMMOB Peyzaj Mimarları Odası İşbirliğinde gerçekleştirilmiş Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesi Uygulanması Yolunda Türkiye Uluslararası Katılımlı Toplantı Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara: TMMOB Peyzaj Mimarları Odası Yayın No: 2008/3, 139-148 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  35. Ş. Şahin, H. Perçin, E. Kurum, O. Uzun, E. Bilgili, L. Tezcan, İ. Çiçek, V. Müftüoğlu, Ö. L. Çorbacı, S. Sütünç, D. Doğan, Ö. Koç, E. Ateş, B. Tarım, G. Kurdoğlu, PEYZAJ-44: Landscape Character Analysis at the Provincial Scale and Its Assessment in terms of Tourism/Recreation (PEYZAJ-44). Final Report of the Project No. 109G074 of TUBITAK KAMAG 1007 Program, where the Client Institutions are Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Environment and Urbanization and Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, and Ankara University is the Executing Institution.(2013) [Google Scholar]
  36. R. Gambino, C. Cassatella, F. Larcher, Mission and Role of the Landscape Observatories in Europe: An Introduction. Uniscape En-Route (2015) [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Atik, B. Tülek, E. Parlak, Yedi Avrupa Ülkesi Örneği ile Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesinin Uygulanması Yolunda Peyzaj Gözlemevleri. PAUD, Cilt 3 Sayı 2 Kış 2021, s.1-11 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  38. H. Baas, B. Groenewoudt, E. Raap, The Dutch approach. Public participation and the role of NGOs and local authorities in the protection, management and development of cultural landscapes in the Netherlands. In: M. Jones & M. Stenseke (eds.): The European Landscape Convention, Landscape Series 13, 45 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. G. Fairclough, A forward-looking convention: European landscapes for the 21st century. In: Naturopa no. 98 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Nogué, P. Sala, Landscape, local knowledge and democracy: the work of the landscape observatory of Catalonia. In: Fairclough, A., Graham, S.-H., Ingrid, I., Swanwick, C. (Eds.), Landscape character assessment: current approaches to characterization and assessment. Routledge Handbook, Oxon (2018) [Google Scholar]
  41. J. Gupta, J. Scholtens, L. Perch, I. Dankelman, J. Seager, F. Sánder, M. Stanley-Jones, I. Kempf, Sustainability Science, 15, 503 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.