EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 594 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 594 (2024) 04005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 594, 2024
2nd International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2024)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 12
Section Legal Issues in Environment and Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459404005
Published online 22 November 2024
  1. K. Hulme, “Using International Environmental Law to Enhance Biodiversity and Nature Conservation during Armed Conflict,” J. Int. Crim. Justice, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1155–1190, 2022, doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqac060. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Dienelt, “Complementing the Laws of Armed Conflict with Human Rights Law and International Environmental Law BT Armed Conflicts and the Environment: Complementing the Laws of Armed Conflict with Human Rights Law and International Environmental Law,” A. Dienelt, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 257–322. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99339-9_5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Bothe, “Protection of the environment in relation to armed conflict—50 years of effort, and no end in sight,” Environ. Secur., vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 24–35, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1177/27538796231195601. [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Gunawan, G. A. Wibowo, and M. H. Arumbinang, “Foreign Fighters in the Ukrainian Armed Conflict: An International Humanitarian Law Perspective,” Volksgeist J. Ilmu Huk. dan Konstitusi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 2023, doi: 10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Demeyere, “Protection of the Environment During Armed Conflict,” Int. Rev. Red Cross, vol. 105, no. 924, pp. 1167–1168, 2023, doi: 10.1017/S1816383123000462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Gunawan and M. E. R. Pane, “Responsibility for Excessive Infrastructure Damage in Attacks: Analyse Ing Russia’ s Attack In Ukraine,” PETITA J. Kaji. Ilmu Huk. dan Syariah, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 212–231, 2024, doi: 10.22373/petita.v9i1.224. [Google Scholar]
  7. I. S. Sara, “Potential Blockchain Applications in Waqf for Sustainability: A Middle East and Asia Perspective,” Islamiyyat, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 47–64, 2023, doi: 10.17576/islamiyyat-2023-4502-04. [Google Scholar]
  8. Z. Samudzi, “‘We are Fighting Nazis’: Genocidal Fashionings of Gaza(ns) After 7 October,” J. Genocide Res., pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1080/14623528.2024.2305524. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Nijim, “Genocide in Palestine: Gaza as a case study,” Int. J. Hum. Rights, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 165–200, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13642987.2022.2065261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Bures and A. J. Hawkins, “Israeli targeted killing operations before and during the Second Intifada: a contextualized comparison,” Small Wars Insur., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 569–593, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09592318.2020.1726574. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Shaw, “Inescapably Genocidal,” J. Genocide Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14623528.2023.2300555. [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Byman, “Curious Victory: Explaining Israel’s Suppression of the Second Intifada,” Terror. Polit. Violence, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 825–852, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1080/09546553.2011.652317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Friedman and H. Ketola, “Violations of the heart: Parental harm in war and oppression,” Rev. Int. Stud., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 393–412, 2024, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S0260210523000499. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Traven, “Response to Joslyn Barnhart’s Review of Law and Sentiment in International Politics: Ethics, Emotions, and the Evolution of the Laws of War,” Perspect. Polit., vol. 20, no. 2, p. 702, 2022, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S1537592722001244. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Salmón and J.-P. Pérez-León-Acevedo, “Reparation for victims of serious violations of international humanitarian law: New developments,” Int. Rev. Red Cross, vol. 104, no. 919, pp. 1315–1343, 2022, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S1816383122000297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Donaldson, “Peace, war, law: teaching international law in contexts,” Int. J. Law Context, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 393–402, 2022, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S1744552322000350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Gacka, “Injuring Family Relations through Gross Violations of International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law,” Isr. Law Rev., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 248–284, 2022, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S0021223722000012. [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Illas, “Necropolitical Law and the Justification of Violence in the War on Terror,” Law Soc. Inq., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1451–1456, 2023, doi: DOI: 10.1017/lsi.2023.28. [Google Scholar]
  19. O. G. Uwa and M. D. Dada, “The Geneva Convention on Laws of War and the Sudan Armed Conflict,” Int. J. Soc. Serv. Res., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1606–1623, 2023, doi: 10.46799/ijssr.v3i7.466. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Abai, “War in Tigray and Crimes of International Law,” Candian Cent. Vict. Torture, no. January, p. 3, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. D. G. S. Mangku, “Roles and Actions That Should Be Taken by The Parties In The War In Concerning Wound and Sick Or Dead During War or After War Under The Geneva Convention 1949,” J. Komun. Huk., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 170–178, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31467. [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Howson and A. de Vries, “Preying on the Poor? Opportunities and Challenges for Tackling the Social and Environmental Threats of Cryptocurrencies for Vulnerable and Low-Income Communities,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102394. [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Setiyawan, W. A. Hidaya, H. Tuasikal, and S. Afiyah, “Green Restorative Justice: Environmental Enforcement and Justice,” Rev. Gestão Soc. e Ambient., vol. 18, no. 2, p. e05194, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n2-095. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Nadeem, “Corporate Governance and Supplemental Environmental Projects: A Restorative Justice Approach,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 261–280, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04561-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Pendle, “Competing authorities and norms of restraint: governing communityembedded armed groups in South Sudan,” Int. Interact., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 873–897, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03050629.2021.1918126. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. A. Mohamed Hassan and S. A. Mohamed Ali, “Limitations On Warfare Methods: A Brief Examination Under International Humanitarian Law,” J. Adv. Humanit. Res., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.56868/jadhur.v2i4.189. [Google Scholar]
  27. N. de Sadeleer, “The Rule of Law: A Core Premise for the Effectiveness of International Environmental Law,” Eur. J. Risk Regul., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: DOI: 10.1017/err.2024.16. [Google Scholar]
  28. J. M. Angstadt, “Can Domestic Environmental Courts Implement International Environmental Law? A Framework for Institutional Analysis,” Transnatl. Environ. Law, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 318–342, 2023, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S2047102523000092. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Awaludin, “State Border versus Culture: An International Legal Examination,” Indones. J. Int. Law, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 110–119, 2018, doi: 10.17304/ijil.vol15.2.721. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. E. van der Zee, “How Insights on Bounded Rationality Could Inform the International Law of Environmental Assessments,” Ger. Law J., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 395–412, 2022, doi: DOI: 10.1017/glj.2022.26. [Google Scholar]
  31. Y. Gunawan, M. H. Aulawi, R. Anggriawan, and T. A. Putro, “Command responsibility of autonomous weapons under international humanitarian law,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 2139906, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2022.2139906. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.