EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 594 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 594 (2024) 05011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 594, 2024
2nd International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2024)
Article Number 05011
Number of page(s) 11
Section Smart Education University Learning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459405011
Published online 22 November 2024
  1. A. S. Alghonaim, “Impact of related activities on reading comprehension of EFL students,” English Language Teaching, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 15–27, 2020, doi: 10.5539/elt.v13n4p15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. N. R. Andzik, C. M. Gist, E. E. Smith, M. Xu, and N. A. Neef, “The effects of gaming on university student quiz performance,” Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Azizifar, S. Roshani, H. Gowhary, and A. Jamalinesari, “The effect of pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension performance of Ilami High School students,” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 188–194, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. H. H. Barzani, R. S. Meena, and H. F. Ali, “Integration of literature in English language teaching: Learners’ attitudes and opinions,” Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–43, 2021, doi: 10.53103/cjlls.v1i1.12. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. F. Baker and L. McEnery, “Building the foundation for close reading with developing readers,” Texas Journal of Literacy Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Boudreaux-Johnson, P. Mooney, and R. E. Lastrapes, “An evaluation of close reading with at-risk fourth-grade students in science content,” The Journal of At-Risk Issues, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Salikin, S. Z. Bin-Tahir, R. Kusumaningputri, and D. P. Yuliandari, “The Indonesian EFL learners’ motivation in reading,” English Language Teaching, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 81–90, 2017, doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n5p81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Ismail, J. K. Syahruzah, and B. Basuki, “Improving the students’ reading skill through translation method,” Journal of English Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 124–131, 2017, doi: 10.31327/jee.v2i2.405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Jinxiu and Z. Zhengping, “Principles and implementation of reading activities in primary school English class,” English Language Teaching, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 74–78, 2016, doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n12p74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. N. Khazaal, “Improving postgraduates’ academic writing skills with summarizing strategy,” Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 413–428, 2019, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3466042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Kirchner and M. L. Mostert, “Aspects of the reading motivation and reading activity of Namibian primary school readers,” Cogent Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1411036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Leopold, A. Brückner, and S. Dutke, “Summarizing as a strategy for science text comprehension: Text-based versus content-based processing,” Discourse Processes, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 728–747, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1563849. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. S. Sabbah, “The effect of college students’ self-generated computerized mind mapping on their reading achievement,” International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 4–36, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Heron-Hruby, B. Trent, S. Haas, and Z. C. Allen, “The potential for using smallgroup literature discussions in intervention-focused high school English,” Reading & Writing Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 379–395, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10573569.2018.1457459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Z. Mat Husin and R. A. Azmuddin, “Learner engagement in using Kahoot! within a university English proficiency course,” Educational Process: International Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 167–180, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. M. Urbani, “Dialogic reading: Implementing an evidence-based practice in complex classrooms,” TEACHING Exceptional Children, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 392–402, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0040059920917694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Wang and J. Dostál, “Using a mind map to learn English vocabulary,” in Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning, in ICEEL ’18. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3291078.3291121. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Suryani, M. Syauqi, and P. D. Meutia, “Improving students’ reading comprehension through mind mapping,” in Prosiding SEMDI-UNAYA (Seminar Nasional Multi Disiplin Ilmu UNAYA), 2017, pp. 315–318. [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Tampubolon and N. B. Panjaitan, “A comparative study between TPS and LRD strategy to enhance students’ reading comprehension,” Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 128–152, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. M. Thomas and J. K. Kim, “Impact of literature circles in the developmental college classroom,” Journal of College Reading and Learning, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 89–114, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2019.1582371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. E. O. Ugwu, “Effect of student teams-achievement divisions and think–pair–share on students’ interest in reading comprehension,” Journal of Educational Research and Practice, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 316–330, 2019, doi: 10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.22. [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Liunokas, “The use of Think, Pair and Share (TPS) strategy in teaching reading skill,” IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 61–71, 2019, doi: 10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Mohamad, F. K. M. Arif, B. S. Alias, and M. M. Yunus, “Online game-based formative assessment: Distant learners post graduate students’ challenges towards Quizizz,” International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 994–1000, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Nelson, “Close reading in the urban classroom: A teacher’s introspection,” Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.4148/24706353.1266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Z. Oo and A. Habók, “The development of a reflective teaching model for reading comprehension in English language teaching,” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 127–138, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Orellana, C. Melo, P. Baldwin, S. De Julio, and J. Pezoa, “The relationship between motivation to read and reading comprehension in Chilean elementary students,” Reading and Writing, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 2437–2458, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11145-020-10051-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. M. Osei, Q. J. Liang, I. Natalia, and M. A. Stephen, “The use of pre-reading activities in reading skills achievement in preschool education,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.1.35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Reserach design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Pourhosein Gilakjani and N. B. Sabouri, “How can students improve their reading comprehension skill?,” Journal of Studies in Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 229–240, 2016, doi: 10.5296/jse.v6i2.9201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Zhao, L. Lin, J. Sun, and Y. Liao, “Using the summarizing strategy to engage learners: Empirical evidence in an immersive virtual reality environment,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 473–482, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40299-020-00499-w. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. R. D. Cahyani, A. Asib, and A. D. Rais, “Improving students’ reading comprehension through mind mapping,” JoLLIET, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Yürük, “Edutainment: Using Kahoot! as a review activity in foreign language classrooms,” Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 89–101, 2019, doi: 10.31681/jetol.557518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. G. N. C. Sabandar, N. R. Supit, and H. T. E. Suryana, “Kahoot!: Bring the fun Into the classroom!,” Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2018, doi: 10.20961/ijie.v2i2.26244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. N. Kletnikov, O. Popovski, and A. Tomova, “Kahoot! foster students’ engagement, enhance classroom dynamics, assess and improve overall students’ learning,” presented at the 2-nd International Scientific Conference MILCON’19, Skopje, 2019. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.