EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 595 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 595 (2024) 01036 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 595, 2024
5th International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2024)
Article Number 01036
Number of page(s) 9
Section Agricultural Economic and Business
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459501036
Published online 22 November 2024
  1. H. Ronny, “KUALITAS LIMBAH PABRIK PENYULINGAN DAUN CENGKEH DI DESA BALIBO KECAMATAN KINDANG KABUPATEN BULUKUMBA,” J. Sulolipu Media Komun. Sivitas Akad. dan Masy., vol. 22(2), 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Buddhi Satyarini, “Economic performance of the ‘Emping Melinjo’ household industry and the entrepreneurial character of the business owner,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 316, p. 02009, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131602009, 2021. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Triyono and H. Sulistyaningsih, “Feasibility and Risk Production of Shallot Farming in Demak, Central Java, Indonesia,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 316, p. 02054, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131602054, 2021. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. R. Kamardiani and R. Wulandari, “The Feasibility of Conventional and Environmentally Friendly Shallot Farming at Selopamioro Village Bantul Regency,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 316, p. 02052, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131602052, 2021. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Rahayu, H. Angginawati, and U. Agus Yulianti, “Feasibility of Dry Land Red Rice Farming in Gunungkidul Regency,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 361, p. 02014, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202236102014, 2022. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Risvansuna Fivintari, H. Salaf Iswara, and T. Barnabas, “Feasibility and Risk Analysis of Red Chili Farming With Irrigation Systems on Coastal Sandy Land, Bantul,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 444, p. 02039, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344402039, 2023. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nur Awan, F. S., and A. Zurfi, “Analysis of community participation in waste management at the sidomandiri sidoharjo integrated waste processing site (TPST) Pringsewu Regency,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 468, p. 03001, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202346803001, 2023. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Lu, X. Yi, and Y. Zou, “Does the new municipal solid waste management regulation promote residents’ waste separation behaviour? Evidence from survey data in Beijing, China,” Waste Manag. Res. J. a Sustain. Circ. Econ., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 556–568, DOI: 10.1177/0734242X231197366, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Azkiya Dihni, “Indonesia Hasilkan 60 Juta Ton Limbah B3 pada Tahun 2021,” Data Boxs, Katadata Media Network. Accessed: Jun. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/02/09/indonesia-hasilkan-60-juta-ton-limbah-b3-pada-2021 [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Abu-Qdais and M. Al-Saleh, “Developing an extended producer responsibility system for solid waste management in Jordan using multi-criteria decision-making approach,” Waste Manag. Res. J. a Sustain. Circ. Econ., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 533–543, DOI: 10.1177/0734242X231198444, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Pujianto and H. Prayuda, “FRESH AND HARDENED PROPERTIES OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE MADE WITH PUMICE AS COARSE AGGREGATE,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 21, no. 87, pp. 110–117, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saputro, E. Adi, N. K. Erliyanti, M. Romalawati, and R. Y. Ramadhan, “PEMANFATAN LIMBAH BIOSOLID DAN FLY ASH UNTUK PEMBUATAN BATU.,” J. Tek. Kim., vol. 14(2), 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Setiawan and M. Arsyanti, “PENINGKATAN KULITAS BATU BATA DENGAN MEMANFAATKAN LIMBAH SEKAM.” [Online]. Available: https://www.kompasiana.com/danisetiawan1/63c825db08a8b53ac1261002/peningkatan-kualitas-batu-bata-dengan-memanfaatkan-limbah-sekam [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Biantoro and W. Hidayat, “PENGARUH TEKANAN KOMPAKSI DAN PEREKAT TERHADAP KARAKTERISTIK BRIKET LIMBAH DAUN CENGKEH,” J. Inov. Mesin. JIM, vol. 3(2), pp. 18–28, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Abrar and N. Abdillah, “STUDI EKSPERIMEN PEMANFATAN LIMBAH SPENT BLEACHING EARTH (SBE) SEBAGAI BAHAN PEMBUAT BATA,” Siklus J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 70–78, DOI: 10.31849/siklus.v5i2.3223, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Irwansyah, F. Isma, and M. Purwandito, “KARAKTERISTIK BATU BATA TANPA PEMBAKARAN DARI LIMBAH INDUSTRI PERTANIAN DAN MATERIAL ALAM. EDUCATIONAL BUILDING,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Bangunan dan Sipil, vol. 14(2), pp. 8–12, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Atmodiwirjo, M. Johanes, D. P. Saginatari, and Y. A. Yatmo, “Ecological aspects of the traditional brick making process in Pedurungan Kidul, Central Java,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 67, p. 04034, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20186704034, 2018. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Oznobikhina, “Ecological aspect of brick production in the development of the territory,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 411, p. 02033, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202341102033, 2023. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. A. Sanad, S. M. Abel Moniem, M. L. Abdel-Latif, H. A. Hossein, and M. S. El-Mahllawy, “Sustainable management of basalt in clay brick industry after its application in heavy metals removal,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 10, pp. 1493–1502, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.070, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Sukayat, “Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Bata Interlock: Apa yang Perlu Anda Ketahui.” Accessed: Jul. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://konstruksibeton.com/kelebihan-dan-kekurangan-bata-interlock/#kelebihan [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.