EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 600 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 600 (2024) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 600, 2024
The 6th International Geography Seminar (IGEOS 2023)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Disaster Mitigation on Tourism and Leisure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202460001003
Published online 29 November 2024
  1. C. A. McGladdery and B. A. Lubbe, “Rethinking educational tourism: proposing a new model and future directions,” Tour. Rev., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 319–329, doi: 10.1108/TR03-2017-0055, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Martini and N. Sharma, “Framing the sublime as affect in post-disaster tourism,” Ann. Tour. Res., vol. 97, p. 103473 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Lin, M. Kelemen, and T. Kiyomiya, “Bridging community resilience and sustainable tourism development via post-disaster education tourism in rural Japan,” J. Organ. Discourse, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–44, doi: 10.36605/jscos.2.1_32, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. X. Tan, T. Ying, D. Mariska, B. Liu-Lastres, S. Ye, and H. Kim, “Residents’ involvement in disaster tourism as a practice: The Case of an Islam destination, Aceh,” Ann. Tour. Res., vol. 96, doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2022.103467, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Tanaka, Ikaptra, S. Kusano, M. Yamazaki, and K. Matsumoto, “Disaster tourism as a tool for disaster story telling,” J. Disaster Res., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 157–162, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p0157, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Jang, K. Sakamoto, and C. Funck, “Dark tourism as educational tourism: the case of ‘hope tourism’ in Fukushima, Japan,” J. Herit. Tour., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 481–492, doi: 10.1080/1743873X.2020.1858088, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. R. Kunwar and N. Karki, “A Study of Dark (Disaster) Tourism in Reconstructed Barpak, Nepal,” Gaze J. Tour. Hosp., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 140–180, doi: 10.3126/gaze.v11i1.26637, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Rindrasih and P. Witte, “Reinventing the post-disaster cultural landscape of heritage tourism in Kotagede, Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” J. Herit. Tour., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 136–150, doi: 10.1080/1743873X.2020.1781870, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Subekti, H. Hafiar, and I. Bakti, “Increasing Public Understanding of Disaster By Way of Educational Tourism in Pangandaran, Indonesia,” doi: 10.4108/eai.20-62020.2300658, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  10. S. R. P. Wulung and C. U. Abdullah, “Upaya Mitigasi Pasca Tsunami Di Destinasi Pariwisata,” Media Bina Ilm., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2883–2894 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Wahyuningtyas, A. Tanjung, I. Idris, and K. Dewi, “Disaster mitigation on cultural tourism in lombok, Indonesia,” Geoj. Tour. Geosites, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1227–1235, doi: 10.30892/gtg.27409-428, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Drabek, “Disaster Responses within the Tourist Industry,” Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7–23 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Faulkner, “Towards a framework for tourism disaster management,” in Tourism Management, vol. 22, no. 2, Routledge, pp. 135–147. doi: 10.1016/S02615177(00)00048-0, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Buhalis, “Marketing the competitive destination of the future,” Tour. Manag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 97–116, Feb. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00095-3, (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. R. P. Wulung, B. Brahmantyo, and A. Rosyidie, “Konsep Kotak Geowisata dan Penerapannya di Destinasi Pariwisata Cekungan Bandung,” J. Tour. Destin. Attract., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 135–144 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B. W. Ritchie, Managing educational tourism, vol. 10. Channel View Publications, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.003, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. S. Chan, K. Nozu, and T. O. L. Cheung, “Tourism and natural disaster management process: perception of tourism stakeholders in the case of Kumamoto earthquake in Japan,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 1864–1885, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1666809, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sung-Chin Chung, Cherng-Jyh Yen, S.-C. Chung, and C.-J. Yen, “Disaster Prevention Literacy among School Administrators and Teachers: A Study on the Plan for Disaster Prevention and Campus Network Deployment and Experiment in Taiwan,” J. Life Sci., vol. 10, no. 4, doi: 10.17265/1934-7391/2016.04.006, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Nguyen, F. Imamura, and K. Iuchi, “Disaster management in coastal tourism destinations: The case for transactive planning and social learning,” Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3–17, doi: 10.14246/irspsd.4.2_3, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Hurtado, R. Dowling, and D. Sanders, “An exploratory study to develop a geotourism typology model,” Int. J. Tour. Res., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 608–613, doi: 10.1002/jtr.1954, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. R. P. Wulung and C. U. Abdullah, “Disaster Literacy on Geotourism Routes,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol., no. Special Issue on SIMASE, pp. 60–69 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  22. S. R. P. Wulung, “Disaster mitigation based geotourism trails,” J. Pariwisata Pesona, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 189–197, doi: 10.26905/jpp.v7i2.7649, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Migoń and E. Pijet-Migoń, “Natural Disasters, Geotourism, and Geo-interpretation,” Geoheritage, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 629–640, doi: 10.1007/s12371-018-0316-x, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. R. P. Wulung, Y. Adriani, B. Brahmantyo, and A. Rosyidie, “Spatial Model Planning for Geotourism Destinations,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1883–1897, Jun (2021). [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Brilha, “Geoheritage and geoparks,” in Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management, Elsevier, pp. 323–335, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00018-6, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. S. R. P. Wulung and B. Brahmantyo, “Geotourism Reinterpretation towards Natural Tourist Attractions in Bandung Basin, West Java, Indonesia,” vol. 259, no. Isot, pp. 278–282, 2019, doi: 10.2991/isot-18.2019.62, (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.