EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 600 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 600 (2024) 02013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 600, 2024
The 6th International Geography Seminar (IGEOS 2023)
Article Number 02013
Number of page(s) 7
Section Geography and Disaster Mitigation Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202460002013
Published online 29 November 2024
  1. S. Puttick, “Geographical education I: fields, interactions and relationships,” Prog. Hum. Geogr., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 898–906, doi: 10.1177/03091325221080251, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Rukmini and L. A. D. E. Saputri, “The authentic assessment to measure students’ English productive skills based on 2013 Curriculum,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 263–273, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8128, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Gulikers, T. Bastiaens, and P. Kirschner, “Authentic assessment, student and teacher perceptions: The practical value of the five-dimensional framework,” J. Vocat. Educ. Train., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 337–357, doi: 10.1080/13636820600955443, (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Agustiningsih and D. Rahdiyanta, “Implementation of an Authentic Assessment Model to Improve the Quality of Learning Assessment,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 103–115, doi: 10.21831/jptk.v25i1.20072, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. S. Tan and C. Lim, “Authentic research experience through mock grant application roleplay,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. March, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1048947, (2023). [Google Scholar]
  6. Munandar, E. Maryani, D. Rohmat, and M. Ruhimat, “Establishing the profesionalism of geography teacher through authentic assessment field study,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 797–818, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13254a, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. Mann and A. Saultz, “The Role of Place, Geography, and Geographic Information Systems in Educational Research,” AERA Open, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1177/2332858419869340, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  8. R. J. Luan and R. Narayanan, “Enhancing Student Engagement With Authentic Assessment In Technology-Based Program : A MultiFaceted Approach,” Int. J. od Mod. Educ., vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 655–664, doi: 10.35631/IJMOE.621048, (2024). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Bandura. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191, (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. E. Brownell and M. J. Kloser, “Toward a conceptual framework for measuring the effectiveness of course-based undergraduate research experiences in undergraduate biology,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 525–544, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1004234, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. E. Brownell, M. J. Kloser, T. Fukami, and R. J. Shavelson, “Context Matters: Volunteer Bias, Small Sample Size, and the Value of Comparison Groups in the Assessment of Research-Based Undergraduate Introductory Biology Lab Courses,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 176–182, doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v14i2.609, (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. A. Shanks, C. L. Robertson, C. S. Haygood, A. M. Herdliksa, H. R. Herdliska, and S. A. Lloyd, “Measuring and Advancing Experimental Design Ability in an Introductory Course without Altering Existing Lab Curriculum,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1194, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Daud, R. Chowdhury, M. Mahdum, and M. N. Mustafa, “Mini-seminar project: An authentic assessment practice in speaking class for advanced students,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 509–516, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i4.16429, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Geçit and A. H. Akarsu, “Critical Thinking Tendencies of Geography Teacher Candidates in Turkey,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1362–1371, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050809, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. U. Krause, T. Béneker, J. van Tartwijk, and V. Maier, “Curriculum contexts, recontextualisation and attention for higher-order thinking,” London Rev. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 0–17, doi: 10.14324/LRE.19.1.24, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. J. A. C. van der Zanden, E. Denessen, A. H. N. Cillessen, and P. C. Meijer, “Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: teacher perceptions and practices,” Res. Post-Compulsory Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 394–419, doi: 10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Danaher, J. Wu, and M. Hewson, “Sustainability: A regional australian experience of educating secondary geography teachers,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 3, doi: 10.3390/educsci11030126, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Sanli and T. Cetin, “Analysis of geography textbook activities in the context of units and critical thinking skills,” Int. J. Geogr. Geogr. Educ., vol. 47, pp. 20–31 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  19. C. K. Cho and B. Y. Kim, “Development and application of environmental education program for inservice geography teachers using community mapping and photovoice,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 11, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12487, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  20. O. L. Liu, L. Frankel, and K. C. Roohr, “Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., no. 1, pp. 1–23, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12009, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Yli-Panula, E. Jeronen, and P. Lemmetty, “Teaching and learning methods in geography promoting sustainability,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, doi: 10.3390/educsci10010005, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Grmuša, S. Musa, and M. Drobac Pavićević, “Elementary school students’ attitudes towards comparison as a method of teaching geography,” Синеза, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–22, doi: 10.7251/sin2201001g, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  23. N. D. Ayuningrum, N. Ngazizah, and A. Ratnaningsih, “The Effectiveness of Authentic Assessment Instrument Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills Integrated with Character Education,” J. Innov. Res. Prim. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.56916/jirpe.v3i1.548, (2024). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Saher, A. M. J. Ali, D. Amani, and F. Najwan, “Traditional Versus Authentic Assessments in Higher Education,” Pegem Egit. ve Ogr. Derg., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 283–291, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.12.01.29, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  25. R. As’ari, “Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Using the Field Laboratory for Geography Education (Case Study on Mount Galunggung, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia),” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, doi: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1287, (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.