Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 600, 2024
The 6th International Geography Seminar (IGEOS 2023)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hazard, Risk, and Disaster Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202460004001
Published online 29 November 2024
  1. Y. A. Wibowo et al., Geospatial technology-based tsunami-prone areas identification, Pacitan, Indonesia in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing, (2023). Accessed: Oct. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/2683/1/030033/2891240 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. R. Abdillah et al., Extreme Wind Variability and Wind Map Development in Western Java, Indonesia, Int J Disaster Risk Sci, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 465–480, (Jun. 2022), doi: 10.1007/s13753-022-00420-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. B. G. Dewanto et al., The 2022 Mw 6.1 Pasaman Barat, Indonesia Earthquake, Confirmed the Existence of the Talamau Segment Fault Based on Teleseismic and Satellite Gravity Data, Quaternary, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 45, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Febriani, S. Ahadi, T. Anggono, C. N. Dewi, and A. D. Prasetio, Applying Wavelet Analysis to Assess the Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) Geomagnetic Anomalies prior to the M6. 1 Banten Earthquake (2018), in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, (2021), p. 012064. Accessed: Oct. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/789/1/012064/meta [Google Scholar]
  5. A. D. Prasetio et al., Spatial variation of b-values correlation with tectonic activity along the Southern Java subduction zone, in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing, (2022). Accessed: Oct. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/2652/1/030005/2831170 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Widiyantoro et al., Implications for megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis from seismic gaps south of Java Indonesia, Scientific reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 15274, (2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Hidayah, N. N. Rohmah, and M. K. Wardhani, Coastal Vulnerability Study on Potential Impact of Tsunami and Community Resilience in Pacitan Bay East Java, in Forum Geografi, (2022). Accessed: Oct. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/17160 [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Usman, K. Murakami, A. D. Wicaksono, and E. Setiawan, Application of agent-based model simulation for tsunami evacuation in Pacitan, Indonesia, in MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, (2017), p. 01064. [Google Scholar]
  9. Z. Jamilah, A. Widodo, and N. Ariyanti, Mapping tsunami hazard levels in Pacitan beach using remote sensing methods, Journal of Marine-Earth Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–4, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Kartikasari, Pemetaan Tingkat Bahaya Tsunami Secara Kuantitatif Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG) di Wilayah Teluk Teleng, Pacitan, Jawa Timur, PhD Thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, (2023). Accessed: Oct. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://repository.its.ac.id/102694/ [Google Scholar]
  11. L. N. Fadlillah, M. Widyastuti, and M. A. Marfai, Comparison of tidal model using mike21 and delft3d-flow in part of Java Sea, Indonesia, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, (2020), p. 012067. Accessed: Oct. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/17551315/451/1/012067/meta [Google Scholar]
  12. P. A. Le Quéré, I. Nistor, and A. Mohammadian, Numerical modeling of tsunamiinduced scouring around a square column: Performance assessment of FLOW-3D and Delft3D, Journal of Coastal Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1278–1291, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Berryman, Review of Tsunami hazard and risk in New Zealand, report by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, New Zealand, (2006). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.