Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 600, 2024
The 6th International Geography Seminar (IGEOS 2023)
Article Number 06005
Number of page(s) 16
Section Spatial Planning, Urban and Rural Environmental Geography
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202460006005
Published online 29 November 2024
  1. G. Chiaffarelli and I. Vagge, “Cities vs countryside: an example of a science-based Peri-urban Landscape Features rehabilitation in Milan (Italy).,” Urban Forestry &Urban Greening, (2023), [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866723001735 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Wolff, M. V. Mdemu, and T. Lakes, “Defining the peri-urban: A multidimensional characterization of spatio-temporal land use along an urban–rural gradient in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania,” Land (Basel), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–17, (2021), doi: 10.3390/land10020177. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Karg, R. Hologa, J. Schlesinger, A. Drescher, G. Kranjac-Berisavljevic, and R. Glaser, “Classifying and mapping periurban areas of rapidly growing medium-sized sub-saharan african cities: A multi-method approach applied to tamale, ghana,” Land (Basel), vol. 8, no. 3, (2019), doi: 10.3390/land8030040. [Google Scholar]
  4. D. L. Choy and M. Buxton, A Resilience Approach To Peri-Urban Landscape Management. apo.org.au, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://apo.org.au/node/59992 [Google Scholar]
  5. D. L. Choy and C. Sutherland, “A changing peri-urban demographic landscape,” Australian Planner, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 24–25, (2008), doi: 10.1080/07293682.2008.9982672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Damon, H. Marchal, and J.-M. Stebe, Sociologists and the peri-urban: Its late discovery, changing definitions and central controversies, Rev Fr Sociol, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 619–639, (2016), [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020288243&doi=10.3917%2Frfs.574.0619&partnerID=40&md5=9a5974e84a11142f8112acee3d8ef5d7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Mondal, Basic Service Provisioning in Peri-urban India: A Regional Perspective from Kolkata Metropolis, Indian Journal of Human Development, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 97–116, (2021), doi: 10.1177/09737030211000930. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Spyra, J. Kleemann, N. C. Calò, A. Schürmann, and C. Fürst, Protection of periurban open spaces at the level of regional policy-making: Examples from six European regions, (2021), Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105480. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Colucci, Peri-urban/peri-rural areas: Identities, values and strategies, in Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, M. and M. S. Colucci Angela and Magoni, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, (2017), pp. 99–104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-410227_12. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Drevelle, Global modelisation and local characteristics of French periurban spatial organization, 17th European Colloquium on Quantitative and …, (2011), [Online]. Available: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00620825/ [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Porreca, N. Rodriguez-Pazmiño, V. Geropanta, and P. Bracchi, Defining marginality in the periurban areas of Quito: A descriptive approach based on empirical and spatial data, Region, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 67–88, (2023), doi: 10.18335/region.v10i1.393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Butsch, S. Chakraborty, S. L. Gomes, S. Kumar, and L. M. Hermans, Changing hydrosocial cycles in Periurban India, Land (Basel), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–22, (2021), doi: 10.3390/land10030263. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Broitman, The long and winding boundaries: quantifying interfaces between residential, natural and agricultural land uses, J Land Use Sci, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 607–625, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2020.1769212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. F. E. Morales, C. G. Lirios, A. S. Sanchez, C. Y. Q. Campas, G. B. Ruíz, and M. del R. M. González, Specification a Model for Study of Periurban Services, International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 85–88, 2020, doi: 10.29121/ijetmr.v7.i1.2020.531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Müller-Eie and A. Llopis Alvarez, An approach to perception mapping: using maps to investigate local user perceptions of urban quality in Hillevåg, Norway, J Urban Des (Abingdon), vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 369–386, (2020), doi: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1656524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Narain, Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience in Education: A Periurban Perspective, An Interdisciplinary Approach for Disaster Resilience …, (2020), doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9527-8_19. [Google Scholar]
  17. I. Zasada, W. Loibl, R. Berges, K. Steinnocher, and ..., Rural–urban regions: A spatial approach to define urban–rural relationships in Europe, Peri-urban futures …, (2013), doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_3. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Ravetz, C. Fertner, and T. S. Nielsen, The dynamics of peri-urbanization, Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land use Change in Europe, pp. 13–44, 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Žlender, Characterisation of peri-urban landscape based on the views and attitudes of different actors, Land use policy, vol. 101, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Pigawati and S. Ghaisani, Typology of the Peri-Urban Area in Demak District, Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, (2020), [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jtsp/article/view/22663 [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Budiyantini and V. Pratiwi, “Peri-urban Typology of Bandung Metropolitan Area,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 227, pp. 833–837, (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. P. Flores, M. E. Gaudiano, and ..., A study of periurban areas land uses based on their fractal dimension: The case of three periurban municipalities of Buenos Aires, 2017 XVII Workshop on …, (2017), [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8214319/ [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Pozoukidou, Modeling urban dynamics: The case of periurban development in east thessaloniki, European Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2018, doi: 10.14712/23361964.2018.4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Sareen and M. Haque, The Dynamics of Peri-Urban Spatial Planning: An Overview, J Urban Plan Dev, vol. 149, no. 3, (2023), doi: 10.1061/jupddm.upeng-4275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Lee-Smith, The dynamics of urban and peri-urban agriculture, African Dynamics, vol. 13, pp. 197–216, (2014), doi: 10.1163/9789004282698_010. [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Rodriguez, E. Bocher, and K. Chancibault, Terrain representation impact on periurban catchment morphological properties, J Hydrol (Amst), vol. 485, pp. 54–67, (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Á. Sánchez, Urban and periurban agriculture: a geographical approach, Investigaciones geográficas, (2004), [Online]. Available: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0188-46112004000100007&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Qviström, Peri-urban landscapes: From disorder to hybridity, The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, pp. 427–437, (Jan. 2013), doi: 10.4324/9780203096925-46. [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Murgante, G. Las Casas, and M. Danese, The periurban city: Geo-statistical methods for its definition, in Proceedings of the Urban and Regional Data Management UDMS Annual 2007, (2008), pp. 473–483. doi: 10.4324/9780203931042-42. [Google Scholar]
  30. R. Koebl and R. Haller, Periurban-a comparison between India and western countries, … (ETC) Association for European Transport (AET), (2006), [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/view/846752 [Google Scholar]
  31. M. A. Ben-Othmen, J. Canchel, L. Devillers, A. Hennart, L. Rouyer, and M. Ostapchuk, Peri-urban Farmers’ Perception of Climate Change: Values and Perspectives – A French Case Study, in Springer Climate, U. Chatterjee, A. O. Akanwa, S. Kumar, S. K. Singh, and A. Dutta Roy, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, (2022), pp. 349–372. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-15501-7_13. [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Lucertini and F. Musco, Circular City: Urban and Territorial Perspectives, (2022), library.oapen.org. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78536-9_7. [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Dede, C. Asdak, and I. Setiawan, Spatial-ecological approach in cirebon’s periurban regionalization, IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1089, no. 1, (2022), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1089/1/012080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Benton-Short and L. Monk, Perspectives on Urban Geography in Advanced Placement® Human Geography, Journal of Geography, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 131–136, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00221341.2015.1084350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. D. La Rosa, D. Geneletti, M. Spyra, C. Albert, and C. Fürst, Sustainable planning for peri-urban landscapes, Ecosystem Services from Forest Landscapes: Broadscale Considerations, pp. 89–126, (2018), doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-74515-2_5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. J. K. Clark and D. K. Munroe, The Relational Geography of Periurban Farmer Adaptation J Rural Community Dev, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 15–28, (2013), [Online]. Available: https://journals.brandonu.ca/jrcd/article/view/1018 [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Buxton, “Connecting peri-urban theory with policy: implications for practice,” Mapping and Forecasting Land Use: The Present and Future of Planning, pp. 55–94, 2022, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90947-1.00005-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. R. E. DÍ AZ‐CARAVANTES, Balancing urban and peri‐urban exchange: water geography of rural livelihoods in Mexico, Geogr J, (2012), doi: 10.1111/j.14754959.2011.00435.x. [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Fazal, Peri-Urban Interactions, Land Use Dynamics in a Developing Economy …, pp. 7–13, (2013), doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5255-9_2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Rustja, The role of geography in managing spatial development processes: The case of the peri-urban area of Shkodër city, Albania, (2011), academia.edu. doi: 10.21861/hgg.2011.73.02.06. [Google Scholar]
  41. D. R. S. Saputro, H. Prasetyo, A. Wibowo, F. Khairina, K. Sidiq, and G. N. A. Wibowo, Bibliometric Analysis of Neural Basis Expansion Analysis for Interpretable Time Series (N-Beats) for Research Trend Mapping, BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1103–1112, (2023), doi: 10.30598/barekengvol17iss2pp1103-1112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Hirve and N. Neelam, “Sustaining Higher Education during a Pandemic a Bibliometric Analysis,” Cardiometry, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/openview/3214030e2a86f3a45b4a9fd916c9d003/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2045095 [Google Scholar]
  43. K. H. Abdullah, M. F. Roslan, N. S. Ishak, and ..., Unearthing hidden research opportunities through bibliometric analysis: a review, Asian Journal of …, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/21868 [Google Scholar]
  44. A. A. Ajaaj, A. K. Mishra, and A. A. Khan, Urban and peri-urban precipitation and air temperature trends in mega cities of the world using multiple trend analysis methods, Theor Appl Climatol, vol. 132, no. 1–2, pp. 403–418, (2018), doi: 10.1007/s00704-017-2096-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. S. Graefe, A. Buerkert, and E. Schlecht, “Trends and gaps in scholarly literature on urban and peri-urban agriculture,” Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, (2019), doi: 10.1007/s10705-019-10018-z. [Google Scholar]
  46. S. McCune, A. M. Bayer, and ..., A Multi-disciplinary Overview of Chagas in Periurban Peru, Journal of …, (2010), [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/jigs/vol1/iss2/1/ [Google Scholar]
  47. S. Lardon, S. Loudiyi, M. Galli, E. Marraccini, and ..., From territory agronomy to regional planning: agricultural management in periurban areas, (2010), hal.science. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-00614861/document [Google Scholar]
  48. M. Kirst, N. Schaefer-McDaniel, S. Hwang, and ..., Moving Forward: The Future of Transdisciplinary Health Research, … Research Approach to …, (2011), doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6330-7_12. [Google Scholar]
  49. S. Cordogan and L. Stanciak, An Examination of the Effects of an Interdisciplinary Curriculum Program on Behavior and Academic Performance in a Suburban High School.(A Compilation from the …. ERIC, (2000). [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED442816 [Google Scholar]
  50. M. G. Mortoja, T. Yigitcanlar, and S. Mayere, What is the most suitable methodological approach to demarcate peri-urban areas? A systematic review of the literature, Land use policy, vol. 95, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. I. Bičík, L. Kupková, L. Jeleček, J. Kabrda, P. Štych, and ..., Influence of SocioEconomic Conditions on Land Use, Land Use Changes in …, (2015), doi: 10.1007/9783-319-17671-0_4. [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Sahana, J. Ravetz, P. P. Patel, H. Dadashpoor, and A. Follmann, Where Is the PeriUrban? A Systematic Review of Peri-Urban Research and Approaches for Its Identification and Demarcation Worldwide, (2023), mdpi.com. doi: 10.3390/rs15051316. [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Bogaert, A. Biloso, I. Vranken, and M. André, “Peri-urban dynamics : landscape ecology perspectives,” Territoires périurbains. Développement, enjeux et perspectives dans les pays du Sud., pp. 59–69, (2015), [Online]. Available: https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/191036/1/BogaertBilosoVrankenAndre_2015_Peri-urbandynamics.pdf [Google Scholar]
  54. C. Beibei, Review on Identification Method and Driving Mechanism of Peri-urban Area, PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, vol. 31, no. 2, p. 210, (2012), doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.02.010. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ar. Manita Saxena and Ar. Suman Sharma, Periurban Area: A Review of Problems and Resolutions, (2015), academia.edu. doi: 10.17577/ijertv4is090051. [Google Scholar]
  56. G. Duranton, Classifying locations and delineating space: An introduction,” J Urban Econ, vol. 125, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2021.103353. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.