EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 484 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 484 (2024) 01026 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 484, 2024
The 4th Faculty of Industrial Technology International Congress: Development of Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering for Enhancing Innovation and Reputation (FoITIC 2023)
Article Number 01026
Number of page(s) 12
Section Manufacturing, Process, and Business Advancement
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448401026
Published online 07 February 2024
  1. Nur Aisyah D, Lokopessy AF, Naman M, Diva H, Manikam L, Adisasmito W, et al. The Use of Digital Technology for COVID-19 Detection and Response Management in Indonesia: Mixed Methods Study. Interact J Med Res. 2023;12:e41308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jeraq MW, Mulder MB, Kaplan D, Lew JI, Farra JC. Telemedicine During COVID-19 Pandemic: Endocrine Surgery Patient Perspective. Journal of Surgical Research. 2022 Jun 1;274:125–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yamin MAY, Alyoubi BA. Adoption of telemedicine applications among Saudi citizens during COVID-19 pandemic: An alternative health delivery system. J Infect Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;13(12):1845–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. World Health Organization. Telemedicine : opportunities and developments in member states : report on the second Global survey on eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. 93p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Klaassen B, van Beijnum BJF, Hermens HJ. Usability in telemedicine systems—A literature survey. Int J Med Inform. 2016;93:57–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kubota T, Kuroda N, Horinouchi T, Ikegaya N, Kitazawa Y, Kodama S, et al. Barriers to telemedicine among physicians in epilepsy care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national-level cross-sectional survey in Japan. Epilepsy and Behavior. 2022 Jan 1;126. [Google Scholar]
  7. Octavia DR, Pristianty L, Hermansyah A. Public perceptions about telemedicine services for COVID-19 self-isolating patients. Pharmacy Education. 2023;23(2):227–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Isherwood KR, Kyle RG, Gray BJ, Davies AR. Challenges to self-isolation among contacts of cases of COVID-19: a national telephone survey in Wales. J Public Health (Oxf). 2023;45(1):e75–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nkire N, Mrklas K, Hrabok M, Gusnowski A, Vuong W, Surood S, et al. COVID-19 Pandemic: Demographic Predictors of Self-Isolation or Self-Quarantine and Impact of Isolation and Quarantine on Perceived Stress, Anxiety, and Depression. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12(February):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang Q, Wang D. Assessing the role of voluntary self-isolation in the control of pandemic influenza using a household epidemic model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(8):9750–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang JA, Hartanti IR, Colin MN, Pitaloka DAE. Telemedicine and artificial intelligence to support self-isolation of COVID-19 patients: Recent updates and challenges. Digit Health. 2022;8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mularczyk-Tomczewska P, Zarnowski A, Gujski M, Jankowski M, Bojar I, Wdowiak A, et al. Barriers to accessing health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland: A nationwide cross-sectional survey among 109, 928 adults in Poland. Front Public Health. 2022;10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gabay G, Ornoy H, Moskowitz H. Patient-centered care in telemedicine – An experimental-design study. Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar 1;159. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rajak M, Shaw K. An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption. Technol Soc. 2021 Nov 1;67:101800. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamal SA, Shafiq M, Kakria P. Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol Soc. 2020;60(March 2019):101212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Katadata. Riset: 30% layanan telemedicine sebut pegawai bahayakan data pasien. Katadata. 2022. p. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fahmi Ahmad Burhan. Telemedicine Tren, Kemenkes Siapkan Regulasi Rekam Medis Digital. Katadata.co.id. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  18. Trapsilawati F, Arini HM, Wijayanto T, Widyanti A, Wibawa AD, Muslim K. Development of Trust-Integrated Technology Acceptance Model for eHealth Based on MetaAnalytic Findings. Proceedings 2019 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics, Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, BioMIC 2019. 2019; [Google Scholar]
  19. Salanitri D, Hare C, Borsci S, Lawson G, Sharples S, Water Fi Eld B. Relationship between trust and usability in virtual environments: An ongoing study. Human Computer Interaction. 2015;9169:49–59. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tang Z, Johnson TR, Tindall RD, Zhang J. Applying Heuristic Evaluation to Improve the Usability of a Telemedicine System. Vol. 12, TELEMEDICINE AND e-HEALTH. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  21. World Health Organisation. Imagining the future of pandemics and epidemics. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nurfikri A, Karnadipa T, Roselina E. Telemedicine app : what ’ s next after pandemi? Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan ( JABT ). 2022;5(1). [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhou M, Zhao L, Kong N, Campy KS, Qu S, Wang S. Factors influencing behavior intentions to telehealth by Chinese elderly: An extended TAM model. Int J Med Inform. 2019;126(2):118–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dhagarra D, Goswami M, Kumar G. Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep 1;141:104164. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Alexandra S, Handayani PW, Azzahro F. Indonesian hospital telemedicine acceptance model: the influence of user behavior and technological dimensions. Heliyon. 2021;7(12). [Google Scholar]
  26. Gilmutdinova IR, Kolyshenkov VA, Lapickaya KA, Trepova AS, Vasileva VA, Prosvirnin AN, et al. Telemedicine platform COVIDREHAB for remote rehabilitation of patients after COVID-19. Eur J Transl Myol. 2021;31(2). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Burney SA, Ali SA, Ejaz A, Siddiqui FA. Discovering the Correlation between Technology Acceptance Model and Usability. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 2017;17(11):53–61. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang Q, Liu J, Zhou L, Tian J, Chen X, Zhang W, et al. Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):1–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Parmanto B, Lewis, Jr. AN, Graham KM, Bertolet MH. Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). Int J Telerehabil. 2016;8(1):3–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tao D, Shao F, Wang H, Yan M, Qu X. Integrating usability and social cognitive theories with the technology acceptance model to understand young users’ acceptance of a health information portal. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(2):1347–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Review of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Vol. 30, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. New York: Springer; 2021. 165–167 p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 2019;31(1):2–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Octavius GS, Antonio F. Antecedents of Intention to Adopt Mobile Health (mHealth) Application and Its Impact on Intention to Recommend: An Evidence from Indonesian Customers. Int J Telemed Appl. 2021;2021(March 2019). [Google Scholar]
  34. Lin CC. Exploring the relationship between technology acceptance model and usability test. Information Technology and Management. 2013 Sep;14(3):243–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Baudier P, Kondrateva G, Ammi C, Chang V, Schiavone F. Patients’ perceptions of teleconsultation during COVID-19: A cross-national study. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;163(September 2020):120510. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vestergaard K. Changes in professionalism through the practice of telemedicine: Conceptualizing a situated sense filter. Professions and Professionalism. 2020;10(3):1–22. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chiou WC, Perng C, Lin CC. The relationship between technology acceptance model and usability test Case of performing E-learning task with PDA. 2009 WASE International Conference on Information Engineering, ICIE 2009. 2009;1:579–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ma Q, Sun D, Tan Z, Li C, He X, Zhai Y, et al. Usage and perceptions of telemedicine among health care professionals in China. Int J Med Inform. 2022;166(August):104856. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Widyanti A, Hafizhah HN. The influence of personality, sound, and content difficulty on virtual reality sickness. Virtual Real. 2022;26(2):631–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Widyanti A, Sofiani NF, Soetisna HR, Muslim K. Eye blink rate as a measure of mental workload in a driving task: Convergent or divergent with other measures? International Journal of Technology. 2017;8(2):283–91. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.