EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 485 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 485 (2024) 07004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 485, 2024
The 7th Environmental Technology and Management Conference (ETMC 2023)
Article Number 07004
Number of page(s) 12
Section Healthy, Safe, and Resilient Community
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448507004
Published online 02 February 2024
  1. Yadav R, Pathak GS. Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production. Nov;135(0959-6526):732–9. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. El-Nemr KW, Cash CS. School Building Conditions’ Influence on Student Behavior in a Medium-Sized Division in Virginia. Educational Planning [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 15];29(2):43–60. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1356892. (2022) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes [Internet]. Dec;50(2):179–211. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/074959789190020T. (1991) [Google Scholar]
  4. Lobb AE, Mazzocchi M, Traill WB. Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behavior. Food Quality and Preference. Mar;18(2):384–95. (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hassan MS, Halbusi HA, Najem A, Razali A, Williams KA, Mustamil NM. Impact of Risk Perception on Trust in Government and Self-Efficiency During COVID-19 pandemic: Does Social Media Content Help Users Adopt Preventative Measures? [Internet]. scite.ai. [cited 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: https://scite.ai/reports/impact-of-risk-perception-on-XxpLGVgk (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues. Jan;56(3):443–57. (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunter LM, Hatch A, Johnson A. Cross-National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors. Social Science Quarterly [Internet]. Sep;85(3):677–94. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x. (2004) [Google Scholar]
  8. Correia E, Sousa S, Viseu C, Leite J. Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the students’ pro-environmental behavior: a case-study in a Portuguese HEI. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. Oct 6;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. Phillips DM, Englis BG. Green consumption is both feminine and masculine—Just ask the androgynous consumer. Journal of Consumer Behavior. Apr 9. (2022) [Google Scholar]
  10. Balundė A, Perlaviciute G, Steg L. The Relationship Between People’s Environmental Considerations and Pro-environmental Behavior in Lithuania. Frontiers in Psychology. Oct 15;10. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. José Manuel Echavarren. The Gender Gap in Environmental Concern: Support for an Ecofeminist Perspective and the Role of Gender Egalitarian Attitudes. Sex Roles. Aug 17. (2023) [Google Scholar]
  12. Thormann TF, Wicker P. Determinants of pro-environmental behavior among voluntary sport club members. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. Jan 5;51(1):29–38. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gaard G. Ecofeminism. International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Jun 29;1–10. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. Akosua AS, Yang X, Clement M, Zalia AH, Fathia BV. City Logistics Measures and Environmental Sustainability: An Evidence from Ghana. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management.;11(05):582–97. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Vedlitz A. Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States. Risk Analysis. Feb;28(1):113–26. (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McKenna E. Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature. Teaching Philosophy.;21(2):189–91. (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Renaguli Abuliezi, Kondo A, Kosuke Niitsu, Ota E. Healthcare graduate students’ perceived control and preventive behavior for COVID-19 in Japan and the United States: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health. Oct 27;10. (2022) [Google Scholar]
  18. Alexandris K, Barkoukis V, Tsormpatzoudis C. Does the theory of planned behavior elements mediate the relationship between perceived constraints and intention to participate in physical activities? A study among older individuals. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity. Feb 20;4(1):39–48. (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Emanuel AS, McCully SN, Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Theory of Planned Behavior explains gender difference in fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite. Dec;59(3):693–7. (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu P, Kong D, Shelley M. Risk Perception, Preventive Behavior, and Medical Care Avoidance among American Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Aging and Health. Mar 27;089826432110020. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. Nouri M, Hanifi N, Babaeivahed N, Mortaghy Ghasemy M. COVID-19 Risk Perception and its Related Factors and Outcomes in Vulnerable Groups: A Systematic Review. Preventive Care In Nursing and Midwifery Journal. Mar 1;13(1):1–13. (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks. Risk Analysis. Dec;14(6):1101–8. (1994) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Carballo RR, León CJ, Carballo MM. Gender as moderator of the influence of tourists’ risk perception on destination image and visit intentions. Tourism Review. Nov 10;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). (2021) [Google Scholar]
  24. Rana IA, Bhatti SS, Aslam AB, Jamshed A, Ahmad J, Shah AA. COVID-19 risk perception and coping mechanisms: Does gender make a difference? International https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420921000625. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang ECL, Khoo-Lattimore C, Arcodia C. A systematic literature review of risk and gender research in tourism. Tourism Management [Internet]. Feb;58:89–100. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517716301893. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, W. Lynn Shirley. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly.;84(2):242–61. (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.