EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 491 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 491 (2024) 02026 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 491, 2024
International Conference on Environmental Development Using Computer Science (ICECS’24)
Article Number 02026
Number of page(s) 8
Section Smart Systems for Environmental Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449102026
Published online 21 February 2024
  1. Prakash Pasupulla, A., Abebe Agisho, H., Seetharaman, S., &Vijayakumar, S. (2022). “Characterization and analysis of TIG welded stainless steel 304 alloy plates using radiography and destructive testing techniques”, Materials Today: Proceedings, 51, 935–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.305 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pydi, H. P., Pasupulla, A. P., Vijayakumar, S., & Agisho, H. A. (2022). “Study on microstructure, behavior and Al₂O3 content flux A-TIG weldment of SS-316L steel”, Materials Today: Proceedings, 51, 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.218 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pydi, H. P., Pradeep, A., Vijayakumar, S., & Srinivasan, R. (2022). “Examination of various weld process parameters in MIG welding of carbon steel on weld quality using radiography &magnetic particle testing”, Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.160 [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Liu, Welding and Joining of Magnesium Alloys _ Woodhead, Publishing Limited (2010 I, 2010.). [Google Scholar]
  5. Mironov, S., Sato, Y. S., & Kokawa, H. (2019). Influence of welding temperature on material flow during friction stir welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 50(6), 2798–2806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05194-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, W., Deng, D., Mao, Z., Tong, Y., & Ran, Y. (2017). Influence of tool rotation rates on temperature profiles and mechanical properties of friction stir welded AZ31 magnesium alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(5–8), 2191–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8918-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, H., Wu, H., Huang, J., Lin, S., & Wu, L. (2007). Effect of welding speed on the material flow patterns in friction stir welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Rare Metals, 26(2), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0521(07)60177-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar, K., & Kailas, S. V. (2008). The role of friction stir welding tool on material flow and weld formation. Materials Science & Engineering. A, Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing, 485(1–2), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Makeshkumar, M., et al. “Investigation on Surface Modified Al7075 with Niobium by Friction Stir Processing.” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, 2021, pp. 8054–8058, doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.094 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gugulothu, B., Nagarajan, N., Pradeep, A., Saravanan, G., Vijayakumar, S., & Rao, J. (2022). “Analysis of mechanical properties for Al-MMC fabricated through an optimized stir casting process”, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2022, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2081189 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gugulothu, B., Seetharaman, S., Vijayakumar, S., & Jenila Rani, D. (2022). “Process parameter optimization for tensile strength and Hardness of Al-MMC using RSM technique”, Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.043 [Google Scholar]
  12. Pal, D., Vijayakumar, S., Rao, T. V. J., & Babu, R. S. R. (2022). “An examination of the tensile strength, hardness and SEM analysis of Al 5456 alloy by addition of different percentage of SiC/flyash”,Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.288 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gugulothu, B., Sankar, S. L., Vijayakumar, S., Prasad, A. S. V., Thangaraj, M., Venkatachalapathy, M., & Rao, T. V. J. (2022). “Analysis of wear behaviour of AA5052 alloy composites by addition alumina with zirconium dioxide using the Taguchi-grey relational method”, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4545531 [Google Scholar]
  14. Paramasivam, P., &Vijayakumar, S. (2021). “Mechanical characterization of aluminium alloy 6063 using destructive and non-destructive testing”, Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.312 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gugulothu, B., Satheesh Kumar, P. S., Srinivas, B., Ramakrishna, A., &Vijayakumar, S. (2021). “Investigating the material removal rate parameters in ECM for Al 5086 alloy-reinforced silicon carbide/flyash hybrid composites by using Minitab-18”, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2079811 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Ravikumar, et al. “Effect of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Welded Dissimilar Materials between AA6061-T651 and AA7075-T651 Alloys,” Int. J. Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 101–114, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu, D., et al. “Effect of an Improved Pin Design on Weld Formability and Mechanical Properties of Adjustable-Gap Bobbin-Tool Friction Stir Welded Al-Cu Aluminum Alloy Joints.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 58, 2020, pp. 1182–1188, doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Song, Qi, et al. “Improving Joint Quality of Hybrid Friction Stir Welded Al/Mg Dissimilar Alloys by RBFNN-GWO System.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 59, 2020, pp. 750–759, doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.037 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maneiah, D., et al. “Process Parameters Optimization of Friction Stir Welding for Optimum Tensile Strength in Al 6061-T6 Alloy Butt Welded Joints.” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 27, 2020, pp. 904–908, doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Aruri, Devaraju, et al. “Wear and Mechanical Properties of 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy Surface Hybrid Composites [(SiC+Gr) and (SiC+Al2O3)] Fabricated by Friction Stir Processing.” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, 2013, pp. 362–369, doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.10.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bahemmat P, Haghpanahi M, Givi MKB, Seighalani KR (2012) Study on dissimilar friction stir butt welding of AA7075-O and AA2024-T4 considering the manufacturing limitation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:939–953 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang Z, Liu YL, Chen JT (2009) Effect of shoulder size on the temperature rise and the material deformation in friction stir welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:889–895 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rajneesh K, Kanwer S, Sunil P (2012) Process forces and heat input as function of process parameters in AA5083-O friction stir welds. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22:288–298 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Karthikeyan S., Mohan B., Kathiresan S., (2021),”Influence of Rotational Magnetorheological Abrasive Flow Finishing Process on Biocompatibility of Stainless Steel 316L”,Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,Vol.30,no.2,pp.1553. doi:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85098953031 [Google Scholar]
  25. Udendhran R., Sasikala R., Nishanthi R., Vasanthi J., (2023),”Smart Energy Consumption Control in Commercial Buildings Using Machine Learning and IOT”,E3S Web of Conferences,Vol.387.doi:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85160560463 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mr. Vaishali Sarangpure. (2014). CUP and DISC OPTIC Segmentation Using Optimized Superpixel Classification for Glaucoma Screening. International Journal of New Practices in Management and Engineering, 3(03), 07 –11. Retrieved from http://ijnpme.org/index.php/IJNPME/article/view/30 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mr. Dharmesh Dhabliya, Ms. Ritika Dhabalia. (2014). Object Detection and Sorting using IoT. International Journal of New Practices in Management and Engineering, 3(04), 01 –04. Retrieved from http://ijnpme.org/index.php/IJNPME/article/view/31 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.