Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 504, 2024
Journées Scientifiques AGAP Qualité 2024
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 15
Section Méthodes passives
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450402004
Published online 26 March 2024
  1. G. C. Summers, R.A. Broding, (1952), Continuous Velocity Logging, Geophysics, 17, pp.598–614. [Google Scholar]
  2. C.B. Vogel, (1952), A seismic logging method, Geophysics, 17, pp. 579–586. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Perrin, D. Belaud, J.P. Yver, C. Naville, (2022), S-wave anisotropy from two dipole sonic data processing methods confronted with fracture permeability, logs and cores, Science and Technology for Energy Transition, Volume 77, https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2022006 [Google Scholar]
  4. M.A. Biot, (1952), Propagation of elastic waves in a cylindrical borehole containing fluid. Journal of Applied Physics, 223, 997–1005. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Benjumea, A.I. Lopez, J.L. Mari, J.L. Garcia-Lobon, (2018), Petrophysical characterization of carbonates (SE of Spain) through full wave sonic data, Journal of applied geophysics, 160, 1–14, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.10.024 [Google Scholar]
  6. J.L. Mari, G. Porel, F. Delay, Contribution of Full Wave Acoustic Logging to the Detection and Prediction of Karstic Bodies, Water 2020, 12(4), 948; DOI: 10.3390/w12040948. [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Delay, J.L. Mari, G. Porel, F. Chabaux, P. Ackerer, (2022), Is subsurface geophysics as seismic and acoustic investigations a rescue to groundwater flow inversion?, Comptes Rendus Geoscience, Part of Special Issue: Geohydrological data & models. https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.157. [Google Scholar]
  8. J.L. Mari, G. Porel, (2016), Flow detection using well seismic data, 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2016, Vienna, Austria, 30 May - 2 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Li, L. Huang, Y. Zheng, Y. Li, P. Wannamaker, J. Moore, (2022), Feasibility of source-free DAS logging for next-generation borehole imaging, Scientific reports, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16027-3. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. L. Mari, F. Delay, G. Porel, P. Gaudiani, (2021), Characterizing flow in the first hundred-meter depth of a fractured aquifer using hybrid seismic methods, acoustic logging, and flow log measurements, Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies Nouvelles 76, 62, https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2021048 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. L. Mari, F. Delay, C. Voisin, P. Gaudiani, (2023), Active and passive acoustic logging applied to the detection of preferential flow in a sedimentary aquifer, Science and Technology for Energy Transition, Volume ??, https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2023018. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. D. Bensen, M. H. Ritzwoller, M.P. Barmin, A.L. Levshin, F. Lin, M.P. Moschetti, N. M. Shapiro, Y. Yang, (2007), Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements, Geophysical Journal International, Volume 169, Issue 3, pp 1239–1260, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x [Google Scholar]
  13. J. E. White, (1983), Underground sound - Application of Seismic Waves. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Aslanyan, D. Davydov, (2012), Spectral Noise Logging, Technical overview, TGT Oilfield Services, www.tgtoil.com [Google Scholar]
  15. J. H. Rosenbaum, (1974), Synthetic microseismograms: logging in porous formation, Geophysics, 39, 14–32. [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Khayer, Adel Shirazy, Aref Shirazy, A. Ansari, A. Hezarkhani, (2022), Permeability estimation from Stoneley waves in carbonate reservoir, Geological Bullin of Turkey, 65–42, DOI: 10.25288/tjb.974505. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.