Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 504, 2024
Journées Scientifiques AGAP Qualité 2024
Article Number 05004
Number of page(s) 11
Section Hydrogéologie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450405004
Published online 26 March 2024
  1. A. Chamroo, R. Ouvrard, T. Poinot, G. Porel, B. Nauleau, Site Expérimental Hydrogéologique de Poitiers : Un champ applicatif pour la modélisation expérimentale, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Gabilly, E. Cariou, Poitou Vendée Charentes. Masson ed, Guides Géologiques Régionaux. Paris 223, (1997). [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Gonnin, E. Cariou, P. Branger, Les facteurs de contrôle de la sédimentation au début du Jurassique moyen sur le seuil du Poitou et ses abords. 315, 853–859 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Gonnin, E. Cariou, J.-P. Bassoullet, J. Gabilly, J.-P. Mourier, La stratigraphie séquentielle, outil de datation régional complémentaire de la biostratigraphie : application à la reconstitution de la dynamique sédimentaire des séries bathoniennes de surface du seuil du Poitou (France). 318, 235–241 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Blazevic, L. Bodet, S. Pasquet, N. Linde, D. Jougnot, L. Longuevergne, TimeLapse Seismic and Electrical Monitoring of the Vadose Zone during a Controlled Infiltration Experiment at the Ploemeur Hydrological Observatory, France, Water. 12, 1230, DOI: 10.3390/w12051230 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. A.M. Binley, S. Henry-Poulter, B. Shaw, Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography, Water Resources Research. 32, 763–769 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Descloitres, O. Ribolzi, Y.L. Troquer, J.P. Thiébaux, Study of water tension differences in heterogeneous sandy soils using surface ERT, Journal of Applied Geophysics. 64, 83–98, DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.12.007 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Hayley, L.R. Bentley, M. Gharibi, M. Nightingale, Low temperature dependence of electrical resistivity: Implications for near surface geophysical monitoring, Geophysical Research Letters. 34, DOI: 10.1029/2007GL031124 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Watlet, O. Kaufmann, A. Triantafyllou, A. Poulain, J.E. Chambers, P.I. Meldrum, P.B. Wilkinson, V. Hallet, Y. Quinif, M. Van Ruymbeke, M. Van Camp, Imaging groundwater infiltration dynamics in the karst vadose zone with long-term ERT monitoring, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 22 1563–1592, DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-1563-2018 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. H.L. Penman, Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 193 120–145, DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1948.0037 (1948). [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Hajji, D.F. Nadeau, B. Music, F. Anctil, J. Wang, Application of the Maximum Entropy Production Model of Evapotranspiration over Partially Vegetated WaterLimited Land Surfaces, Journal of Hydrometeorology. 19, DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-17-0133.1 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Alves, B. Music, D.F. Nadeau, F. Anctil, Comparing the Performance of the Maximum Entropy Production Model With a Land Surface Scheme in Simulating Surface Energy Fluxes, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 124 3279–3300, DOI: 10.1029/2018JD029282 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.