EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 505 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 505 (2024) 04001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 505, 2024
3rd International Conference on Applied Research and Engineering (ICARAE2023)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 14
Section Manufacturing Techniques
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450504001
Published online 25 March 2024
  1. Al-Fakih, A., Mohammed, B.S., Liew, M.S. and Nikbakht, E., 2019. Incorporation of waste materials in the manufacture of masonry bricks: An updated review. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, pp.37–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Munir, M.J., Kazmi, S.M.S., Gencel, O., Ahmad, M.R. and Chen, B., 2021. Synergistic effect of rice husk, glass and marble sludges on the engineering characteristics of eco-friendly bricks. Journal of Building Engineering, 42, p.102484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rehman, M.U., Ahmad, M. and Rashid, K., 2020. Influence of fluxing oxides from waste on the production and physicomechanical properties of fired clay brick: A review. Journal of building engineering, 27, p.100965. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guan, X., Wang, J. and Xiao, F., 2021. Sponge city strategy and application of pavement materials in sponge city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, p.127022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alhawat, M., Ashour, A., Yildirim, G., Aldemir, A. and Sahmaran, M., 2022. Properties of geopolymers sourced from construction and demolition waste: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 50, p.104104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Salleh, S.Z., Kechik, A.A., Yusoff, A.H., Taib, M.A.A., Nor, M.M., Mohamad, M., Tan, T.G., Ali, A., Masri, M.N., Mohamed, J.J. and Zakaria, S.K., 2021. Recycling food, agricultural, and industrial wastes as pore-forming agents for sustainable porous ceramic production: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, p.127264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vishnu, T.B. and Singh, K.L., 2021. A study on the suitability of solid waste materials in pavement construction: A review. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 14, pp.625–637. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sudharsan, N. and Sivalingam, K., 2019. Potential utilization of waste material for sustainable development in the construction industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), pp.3435–3438. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu, H., Zuo, J., Zillante, G., Wang, J. and Yuan, H., 2019. Status quo and future directions of construction and demolition waste research: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, p.118163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, X., Qin, D., Hu, Y., Ahmad, W., Ahmad, A., Aslam, F. and Joyklad, P., 2022. A systematic review of waste materials in cement-based composites for construction applications. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, p.103447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, J. and Wang, J., 2019. Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, p.117946. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dabaieh, M., Heinonen, J., El-Mahdy, D. and Hassan, D.M., 2020. A comparative study of life cycle carbon emissions and embodied energy between sun-dried bricks and fired clay bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, p.122998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cong, P. and Cheng, Y., 2021. Advances in geopolymer materials: A comprehensive review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 8(3), pp.283–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Erdogmus, E., Harja, M., Gencel, O., Sutcu, M. and Yaras, A., 2021. New construction materials were synthesized from water treatment sludge and fired clay brick wastes. Journal of Building Engineering, 42, p.102471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Muñoz, P., Letelier, V., Zamora, D. and Morales, M.P., 2020. Feasibility of using paper pulp residues in fired clay bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, p.121464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Riaz, M.H., Khitab, A. and Ahmed, S., 2019. Evaluation of sustainable clay bricks incorporating Brick Kiln Dust. Journal of Building Engineering, 24, p.100725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding, Y., Zhao, J., Liu, J.W., Zhou, J., Cheng, L., Zhao, J., Shao, Z., Iris, Ç., Pan, B., Li, X. and Hu, Z.T., 2021. A review of China's municipal solid waste (MSW) and comparison with international regions: Management and technologies in treatment and resource utilization. Journal of cleaner Production, 293, p.126144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Collivignarelli, M.C., Canato, M., Abba, A. and Miino, M.C., 2019. Biosolids: what are the different types of reuse? Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, p.117844. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ibrahim, J.E.F., Kotova, O.B., Sun, S., Kurovics, E., Tihtih, M. and Gömze, L.A., 2022. Preparation of innovative eco-efficient composite bricks based on zeolite-poor rock and Hen's eggshell. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, p.103491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang, Y., Ling, T.C., Mo, K.H. and Shi, C., 2019. A critical review of waste glass powder-Multiple utilization roles in cement-based materials and construction products. Journal of environmental management, 242, pp.440–449. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sormunen, P. and Kärki, T., 2019. Recycled construction and demolition waste is a possible source of materials for composite manufacturing. Journal of building engineering, 24, p.100742. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mendes, B.C., Pedroti, L.G., Vieira, C.M.F., Marvila, M., Azevedo, A.R., de Carvalho, J.M.F. and Ribeiro, J.C.L., 2021. Application of eco-friendly alternative activators in alkali-activated materials: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, p.102010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gallego-Schmid, A., Chen, H.M., Sharmina, M. and Mendoza, J.M.F., 2020. Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, p.121115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marinello, S., Lolli, F., Gamberini, R. and Rimini, B., 2020. A second life for cigarette butts? A review of recycling solutions. Journal of hazardous materials, 384, p.121245. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Siberian, M., Li, J., Donnoli, A., Bonderenko, E., Oliva, P., Gill, B., Lockrey, S. and Siddique, R., 2021. Recycling of spent coffee grounds in construction materials: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, p.125837. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bajaber, M.A. and Hakeem, I.Y., 2021. UHPC evolution, development, and utilization in construction: A review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 10, pp.1058–1074. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Armenise, S., SyieLuing, W., Ramírez-Velásquez, J.M., Launay, F., Wuebben, D., Ngadi, N., Rams, J. and Muñoz, M., 2021. Plastic waste recycling via pyrolysis: A bibliometric survey and literature review. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 158, p.105265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mondal, M.K., Bose, B.P. and Bansal, P., 2019. Recycling waste thermoplastic for energy-efficient construction materials: An experimental investigation. Journal of environmental management, 240, pp.119–125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Salehi, S., Arashpour, M., Kodikara, J. and Guppy, R., 2021. Sustainable pavement construction: A systematic literature review of environmental and economic analysis of recycled materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, p.127936. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, D., Liu, M. and Ma, Z., 2020. Properties of the foam concrete containing waste brick powder derived from construction and demolition waste. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, p.101509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Naik, H.R., Manjunath, Manjunath L.H., Vinayak Malik, Manjunath Patel GC, Kuldeep K Saxena, and Avinash Lakshmikanthan. 2022. “Effect of Microstructure, Mechanical and Wear on Al-CNTs/Graphene Hybrid MMC’S.” Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies 8 (sup2): 366–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rajput, S.K., Jitendra Kumar, Yashwant Mehta, Tarun Soota, and K.K. Saxena. 2020. “Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 316L Stainless Steel Using Multiaxial Forging.” Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies 6 (3): 509–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sahai, Nitin, Kuldeep K. Saxena, and Manashjit Gogoi. 2020. “Modelling and Simulation for 3D Printed Polymeric Porous Tissue Scaffolds Fabrication.” Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies 6 (3): 530–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Samyal, Rahul, Ashok Kumar, Bagha, Raman, Bedi, Shashi, Bahl, Kuldeep K. Saxena, and Shankar Sehgal. 2021. “Predicting the Effect of Fiber Orientations and Boundary Conditions on the Optimal Placement of PZT Sensor on the Composite Structures.” Materials Research Express 8 (7): 75302. [Google Scholar]
  35. Saxena, K.K., K. Chetan, K. Vaibhav, K.V. Mani Krishna, Vivek Pancholi, S.K. Jha, and D. Srivastava. 2019. “Constitutive Analysis of Zr-1Nb Alloy for Different Phase Regions.” Materials Performance and Characterization 8 (5): 821–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Saxena, K.K., S.K. Jha, Vivek Pancholi, G.P. Chaudhari, D. Srivastava, G.K. Dey, and N. Saibaba. 2017. “Role of Activation Energies of Individual Phases in Two-Phase Range on Constitutive Equation of Zr-2.5 Nb-0.5 Cu Alloy.” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 27 (1): 172–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Saxena, K.K., Vivek Pancholi, S.K. Jha, G.P. Chaudhari, D. Srivastava, and G.K. Dey. 2017. “A Novel Approach to Understand the Deformation Behavior in Two Phase Region Using Processing Map.” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 706: 511–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saxena, Kuldeep K, and Achchhe Lal. 2012. “Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes with Number of Stone-Wales and Vacancy Defects.” Procedia Engineering 38: 2347–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Saxena, Kuldeep Kumar, Vivek, Pancholi, Gajanan Prabhakar, Chaudhari, Dinesh, Srivastava, Gautam Kumar Dey, Sanjay K. Jha, and N. Saibaba. 2017. “Hot Deformation Behaviour and Microstructural Evaluation of Zr-1Nb Alloy.” In Materials Science Forum, 890:319–22. Trans Tech Publ. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sharma, Ujjwal, Nakul, Gupta, and Kuldeep K. Saxena. 2021. “Comparative Study on the Effect of Industrial Byproducts as a Replacement of Cement in Concrete.” Materials Today: Proceedings 44: 45–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Bhukya, M. N., Kota, V. R., & Depuru, S. R. (2019). A simple, efficient, and novel standalone photovoltaic inverter configuration with reduced harmonic distortion. IEEE access, 7, 43831–43845. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Peddakrishna, S., & Khan, T. (2018). Design of UWB monopole antenna with dual notched band characteristics by using n-shaped slot and EBG resonator. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 96, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vijayakumar, Y., Nagaraju, P., Yaragani, V., Parne, S. R., Awwad, N. S., & Reddy, M. R. (2020). Nanostructured Al and Fe co-doped ZnO thin films for enhanced ammonia detection. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 581, 411976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reddy, K. S. P., Roopa, Y. M., Ln, K. R., & Nandan, N. S. (2020 July) IoT based smart agriculture using machine learning. In 2020 Second international conference on inventive research in computing applications (ICIRCA) (pp. 130–134). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  45. SudhirSastry, Y. B., Krishna, Y., & Budarapu, P. R. (2015). Parametric studies on buckling of thin walled channel beams. Computational Materials Science, 96, 416–424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Naresh, M., & Munaswamy, P. (2019). Smart agriculture system using IoT technology. International journal of recent technology and engineering, 7(5), 98–102. [Google Scholar]
  47. Raji, A., Nesakumar, J. I. E. T., Mani, S., Perumal, S., Rajangam, V., Thirunavukkarasu, S., & Lee, Y. R. (2021). Biowaste-originated heteroatom-doped porous carbonaceous material for electrochemical energy storage application. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 98, 308–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.