Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 506, 2024
The 1st International Symposium on Environmental and Energy Policy (ISEEP 2023)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Environmental Governance and Regulatory Framework
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450605003
Published online 25 March 2024
  1. M. Lipsky, Birokrasi Tingkat Jalanan: Dilema Individu dalam Pelayanan Publik Edisi Terkini (Yayasan Russell Sage, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, Statistik Perkebunan Unggulan Nasional 2020-2022 (Sekretariat Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, Jakarta, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Aslinda, Model Kebijakan Publik Dan Teori Perubahan Kebijakan (Edisi Revisi) (Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, 2023) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Lipsky, Street‐level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1980) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Madani, M. I. N. Iva, and I. Amiruddin, Kolaborasi J. Adm. Publik 7 333 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Z. Brodkin, Pub. Adm. Rev. 72 940–949 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Østergaard Møller and G. Sommer Harrits, Crit. Policy Stud. 7 155 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Hupe, M. Hill, and A. Buffat, Underst. Street-Level Bur. 315 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Ø. Møller and D. Stone, Soc. Policy Adm. 47 586 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Grindle, Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Peasants in Mexico: A Case Study in Public Policy (University of California Press, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  11. F. A. Lazin, Politics and Policy Implementation: Project Renewal in Israel (SUNY Press, 1994) [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Loyens, in Res. Handb. Street-Level Bur. (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019), pp. 351–369 [Google Scholar]
  13. E. C. Marques, Redes Sociais, Instituições e Atores Políticos No Governo Da Cidade de São Paulo (Annablume, Sao Paulo, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. E. Matland, J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 5 145 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Senghaas, C. Freier, and P. Kupka, Soc. Policy Adm. 53 613 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. D. Siciliano, Am. Rev. Public Adm. 47 79 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Gale, G. Dowswell, S. Greenfield, and T. Marshall, Soc. Sci. Med. 177 9 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Goffman, Frame analysis (Harper and Row, New York, 1974) [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Fligstein, Sociol. Theory 19 105 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. H. Panhwar, S. Ansari, and A. A. Shah, Int. Res. J. Arts Humanit. 45 253 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Vom Brocke, A. Simons, K. Riemer, B. Niehaves, R. Plattfaut, and A. Cleven, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37 9 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Chang, Ration. Soc. 34 6 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Downs, Inside Bureaucracy (Little, Brown, Inc., Boston, 1967) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.