EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 517 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 517 (2024) 05009 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 517, 2024
The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Application (ICETIA 2023)
Article Number 05009
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451705009
Published online 15 April 2024
  1. Y. Muntafi, N. Nojima, and A. U. Jamal, “Damage Probability Assessment of Hospital Buildings in Yogyakarta, Indonesia as Essential Facility due to an Earthquake Scenario,” J. Civ. Eng. Forum, 6, (3), p. 225, 2020, doi: 10.22146/jcef.53387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Zega, V. Education, S. Program, and T. Training, “International Journal of Multi-Science Comparison of the Reinforced Concrete Building Structure With a Conventional Concrete Floor Plate,” 1, (6), pp. 6– 19, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. B. D. Hueste and J. W. Bai, “Seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete flat-slab structure: Part II seismic fragility analysis,” Eng. Struct., 29, (6), pp. 1178–1188, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Martino, R. Suryanita, and A. Adnan, “Intelligent monitoring system on prediction of building damage index using neural-network,” Telkomnika, 10, (1), pp. 155–164, 2012, doi: 10.12928/telkomnika.v10i1.773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Nurchasanah, M. Ujianto, and F. M. Annas, “Shear behaviour of slender geometry RC coupling beams in seismic response,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 403, (1), 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757899X/403/1/012016. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Solikin, A. N. Zaini, B. Setiawan, and A. Asroni, “Flexural strength analysis of styrofoam concrete hollow panel walls incorporated with high volume fly ash,” Civ. Eng. Archit., 8, (3), pp. 320–325, 2020, doi: 10.13189/cea.2020.080316. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Ujianto, A. Z. M. Ali, and M. Solikin, “Structural behaviour of precast concrete wall panels due to dynamic load: A review,” AIP Conf. Proc., 2114, (6), 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5112457. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Yurizka and A. Rosyidah, “The Performance of Irregular Building Structures Using Pushover Analysis,” Log. J. Ranc. Bangun dan Teknol., 20, (2), pp. 65–72, 2020, doi: 10.31940/logic.v20i2.1456. [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Wahyuni, P. Aji, and F. Budi, “Study of Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for High Potential Seismic Hazard According to Indonesian Standard,” IPTEK J. Proc. Ser., 0, (2), p. 19, 2017, doi: 10.12962/j23546026.y2017i2.2273. [Google Scholar]
  10. T. T. Soong and G. F. Dargush, Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering 1st Edition, 1 edition. US: Wiley, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Teddy, G. Hardiman, N. Nuroji, and S. Tudjono, “Method of Buildings Structural Vulnerability and Geometry Form Designs Evaluation Towards Earthquakes With The SVA Architectural Design,” J. Archit. Des. Urban., 2, (2), pp. 53–66, 2020, doi: 10.14710/jadu.v2i2.7577. [Google Scholar]
  12. J.-B. Han, “Research on determining the aseismic performance level of a reinforced concrete building,” Int. J. Archit. Urban., 5, (2), pp. 246–251, 2021, doi: 10.32734/ijau.v5i2.6682. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Pudjisuryadi, B. Lumantarna, R. Setiawan, and C. Handoko, “Performance of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Designed in Accordance to Older Indonesian Seismic Code: A Case Study for a Hotel in Kupang, Indonesia,” Civ. Eng. Dimens., 20, (1), pp. 35–40, 2018, doi: 10.9744/ced.20.1.35-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. M. LaFave and J.-H. Kim, “Joint Shear Behavior Prediction for RC Beam-Column Connections,” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., 5, (1), pp. 57–64, 2011, doi: 10.4334/ijcsm.2011.5.1.057. [Google Scholar]
  15. H. A. Abass and H. K. Jarallah, “Comparative Study of the Seismic Assessment According to ATC-40, FEMA-356 and FEMA-440 for Existing Hospital Building Located at Baghdad City,” no. June, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Haryanto, H.-T. Hu, A. L. Han, B. A. Hidayat, A. Widyaningrum, and P. E. Yulianita, “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Using Rapid Visual Screening: Case Study of Educational Facility Buildings of Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia,” Civ. Eng. Dimens., 22, (1), pp. 13–21, 2020, doi: 10.9744/ced.22.1.13-21. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Parmar, K. Raval, S. Bhavsar, and J. Panchal, “Rapid Visual Screening of the existing building of Gandhinagar City and Surrounded Area,” 6, (2), pp. 2348–2350, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. M. M. Aung and M. N. Aye, “Seismic safety assessment of existing low-rise RC buildings with rapid visual screenings and preliminary evaluation methods,” ASEAN J. Sci. Technol. Dev., 38, (1), pp. 29–36, 2021, doi: 10.29037/AJSTD.649. [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Harirchian and T. Lahmer, “Improved rapid visual earthquake hazard safety evaluation of existing buildings using a type-2 fuzzy logic model,” Appl. Sci., 10, (7), 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10072375. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. N. Sari, R. Prastowo, R. Junaidi, and A. Machmud, “Rapid Visual Screening of Building for Potential Ground Movement in Kalirejo, Kulonprogo, Yogyakarta,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, 9, (1), pp. 51–59, 2020, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.5190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Parmar, V. M. Patel, and A. P. Singh, “Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings in Surat city of western India,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., 8, (10), pp. 719–723, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.J8876.078219. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. J. Pierre and I. Hidayat, “Seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures with pushover analysis,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 426, (1), 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012045. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Gawande, “Seismic Performance of Re-Entrant Corner Building Under the Different,” 4, (2350), pp. 1–5, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Of and T. H. E. Topics, “Performance of Building Earthquake Technology from The Latest Major Earthquake {Resuming from 15th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering (WCEE) in Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 September 2012} Hari Nugraha Nurjaman Persada Indonesia University,” no. September, pp. 24–28, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. N. C. Idham, “Earthquake Disaster Mitigation in the Building Industry,” J. Archit. Res. Des. Stud., 4, (2), 2020, doi: 10.20885/jars.vol4.iss2.art11. [Google Scholar]
  26. N. Haerudin, R. Rustadi, H. Fitriawan, D. Siska, and M. Farid, “Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Mapping By Modeling of Land Layer and Site Effect Zone in The Kota Baru of South Lampung,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, 8, (1), pp. 53–67, 2019, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v8i1.3705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. E. Forum, “Performance Evaluation of the Ird Rsup Dr. Sardjito Building To the Influence of Earthquake,” J. Civ. Eng. Forum, 20, (1), pp. 1183– 1188, 2012, doi: 10.22146/jcef.18945. [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Ghobarah, “Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: State of development,” Eng. Struct., 23, (8), pp. 878–884, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00036-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.