Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 517, 2024
The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Application (ICETIA 2023)
Article Number 05028
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451705028
Published online 15 April 2024
  1. J. Zhang, W. Zhang, P. Xu, and N. Chen. Applicability of Accident Analysis Methods to Chinese Construction Accidents. Journal Safety Res. 68: 187–196. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Bavafa, A. Mahdiyar, and A. K. Marsono. Identifying and Assessing the Critical Factors for Effective Implementation ofSafety Program in Construction Projects. Safety Science. 106: 47–56. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Winge and E. Albrechtsen. Accident Types and Barrier Failures in the Construction Industry. Safety Science. 105: 158–166. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Karimi and H. Taghaddos. The Influence of Craft Workers’ Educational Attainment and Experience Level in Fatal Injuries Prevention in Construction Projects. Safety Sscience. 117: 417 427. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Dogan, M. A. Yurdusev, S. A. Yildizel, and G. Calis. Investigation of Scaffolding Accident in a Construction Site: A Case Study Analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis. 120: 105–108 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Hoła and M. Szóstak. Methodology of Analysing the Accident Rate in the Construction Industry. Procedia Eng. 172: 355–362. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. O. Sanni-Anibire, A. S. Mahmoud, M. A. Hassanain, and B. A. Salami. A Risk Assessment Approach for Enhancing Construction Safety Performance. Safety Science. 121: 15–29. (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. S. Dharek, G. B. Deepak, P. Sughosh, and G. B. Shalini, in Mater. Today Proc. (Elsevier Ltd, 2023), pp. 1–8 [Google Scholar]
  9. R. P. Saptaningrum, W. P. Wijayanti, and F. Usman. Kajian Perubahan Pemanfaatan Ruang dan Keterkaitannya dengan karakteristik Migran di Kelurahan Tunggulwulung. Region and Environment Journal. 12: 37–44. (2023) [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Okolelova, M. Shibaeva, and O. Shalnev. Development of Innovative Methods for Risk Assessment in High-Rise Construction Based on Clustering of Risk Factors. E3S Web Conf. 33:1-9. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Manzoor, I. Othman, and A. Waheed. Accidental Safety Factors and Prevention Techniques for High-Rise Building Projects. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 13(5):1–8. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Li, Y. Ning, and W. T. Chen. Facile Synthesis of Highly Efficient ZnO/ZnFe2O4 Photocatalyst Using Earth-Abundant Sphalerite and its Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 226: 324–336. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. He, M. Gao, T. Liang, Y. Lu, X. Lai, and F. Pan, J. Build. Eng. 51, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Varghese and B. I. Koshy. Risk Perception on Building Construction Safety. Materialstoday Proceedings. (2023) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Fitrialita. Analisis Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Pekerja Ketinggian Dengan Metode HIRARC Di Proyek MTH 27 Ofice Suite PT X Tahun 2021. Dohara Publisher Open Access Journal. 01(4): 140–147. (2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Maddeppungeng and R. A. Aditya. Analisis Risiko Biaya Dan Waktu pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Struktur Atas Proyek Gedung Bertingkat Tinggi (Studi Kasus: Proyek Bangunan Gedung Bertingkat Tinggi di DKI Jakarta dan Sekitarnya). Jurnal Fondasi. 8(2):109–119. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Hartono, H. N. Rahmah, and Sugiyarto. Identifikasi Bahaya dan Penilaian Risiko dalam Pekerjaan Pengecoran Beton untuk Proyek Gedung dengan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Matriks Tek. Sipil. 25–32. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. X. Zhang and S. R. Mohandes, Occupational Health and Safety in Green Building Construction Projects: A Holistic Z-Numbers-Based Risk Management Framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 275, 122788 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Lette, A. Ambelu, T. Getahun, and S. Mekonen, Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 68, 57 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Muttaqien, DetikNews 1 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Syahbana, Duta Metro 1 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Kusuma, Trib. Probolinggo 1 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. P. Raharjo, J. Keilmuan Dan Apl. Tek. Sipil 1,1 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Hartono;, Y. Purwandari;, and Sugiyarto. Analisis Sistem Manajemen Dan Keselamatan Kerja (SMK3) Terhadap Tingkat Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung. E-Jurnal Matriks Tek. Sipil. 208–215. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. W. Hartono, F. Ridwansyah, and Sugiyarto. Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan Alat Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Terhadap Kinerja Pekerja Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Waduk Logung Kabupaten Kudus, Jawa Tengah). E-Jurnal Matriks Teknik Sipil. 4(1). (2016). [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Hartono, S. Sugiyarto, and P. Siwi R. Studi Manajemen Risiko Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja dengan Metode HIRAC (Studi Kasus: Pada Proyek Pembangunan Apartemen Tamansari Amarta Yogyakarta). Matriks Teknik Sipil. 7(2): 133–136. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. T. Magna, W. Hartono, and Sugiyarto. Analisis Risiko Konstruksi Struktur Bore Pile Pada Proyek Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Matriks Teknik Sipil. 5(2): 598–604. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Rethyna. Analisis Risiko Keselamatan Dan Kesehata Kerja (K3) Pada Bangunan Gedung Bertingkat. Ikraith-Teknologi 2(1): 20–24. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  29. M. P. U. D. P. R. R. Indonesia, Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Pemenuhan Sertifikat Standar Jasa Konstruksi Dalam Rangka Mendukung Kemudahan Perizinan Berusaha Bagi Pelaku Usaha Jasa Konstruksi (Indonesia, 2022), p. 199 [Google Scholar]
  30. M. K. R. Indonesia, Penilaian Barang Milik Negara (Indonesia, 2017), p. 23 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nurhijrah. Pencegahan Resiko Kecelakaan Jatuh Dari Ketinggian Pada Pekerjaan Industri Konstruksi Di Indonesia. Pena Teknik. 3(1): 85–92. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Manzoor, I. Othman, and M. Manzoor. Evaluating the Critical Safety Factors Causing Accidents in High-Rise Building Projects. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 12(3): 2485–2492. (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. H. G. Istiqlal and T. Trijeti, Semin. Nas. Penelit. LPPM UMJ 1 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  34. W. P. Tagueha, J. B. Mangare, and T. Tj. Arsjad, Manajemen Resiko Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) pada Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus: Pembangunan Gedung Laboratorium Fakultas Teknik Unsrat). Jurnak Sipil Statik. 6(11): 907–916. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  35. W. A. Suwardana, L. Sudiajeng, and I. K. Sutapa. Pengaruh Smk3 Terhadap Tingkat Kecelakaan Kerja Dan Kesehatan Pekerja Pada Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus: Sahid Kuta Lifestyle Resort 2). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Keteknisipilan bidang Vokasional. 1(1): 295–300. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  36. N. Arsyad, A. Sari, U. D. Arman, A. Y. Trinanda, and R. S. Putra. Pengaruh Penerapan New Normal terhadap Kepuasan Penumpang Bus Trans Padang Rute Lubuk Buaya-Pasar Raya. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Padang. 10(1): 19–25. (2023). [Google Scholar]
  37. C. K. Setiawan and S. Y. Yosepha. Pengaruh Green Marketing Dan Brand Image Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk The Body Shop Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah M-Progress. 10 (1). (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. K. Bhattacharjee, N. Bugalia, and A. Mahalingam. An Analysis of Safety Practices for Small, Medium, and Large Construction Projects: A Resilience Engineering Perspective. Safety Science. 169: 1–14. (2024) [Google Scholar]
  39. A.R. Hakim. Identifikasi Dan Penilaian Risiko Sistem Kesehatan, Keselamatan Kerja Dan Lingkungan Pada Pembangunan Apartemen. Jurnal teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan. 7(3): 231–240. (2022) [Google Scholar]
  40. B. Manzoor, I. Othman, and A. Waheed. Accidental Safety Factors and Prevention Techniques for High-Rise Building Projects–A Review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 13: 1–8. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  41. A. T. TG Pelatta, N Maelissa, HD Titaley, J. Agreg. 2, 107 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Singh and S. C. Misra. Safety Performance & Evaluation Framework in Indian Construction Industry. Safety Science. 134, 105023 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.