EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 518 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 518 (2024) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 518, 2024
9th International Conference on Energy Science and Applied Technology (ESAT 2024)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451801013
Published online 17 April 2024
  1. National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration. “Fourteenth Five-Year Plan” Modern Energy System [EB/OL](2022-0322) [2022-04-01]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwdt/tzgg/202203/t202203 22_1320017.html?code=&state=123. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hussain Sheikh Aabid, Ilahi Bakhsh Farhad. Sustainable development and applications of variable frequency transformer (VFT) Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 57 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. Iba K, Suzuki H, Practical reactive power allocation/operation planning using successive linear programming. IEEE Transactions Apparatus and Systems. 3(2):558–566 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  4. Conti, Raiti, Tina. Small-scale embedded generation effect on voltage profile: an analytical method. IEEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 150(1):78–86 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  5. G.A. Taylor, M. Rashidinejad, Y. H. Song. Algorithm techniques for transition optimised voltage and reactive power control. IEEE Trans on Power Systems 104(1):1660–1664 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  6. Yin Linfei, He Xiaoyu. Artificial emotional deep Q learning for Realtime smart voltage control of cyber-physical social power systems. Energy, 273 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  7. Li B B, Wang L, Liu B. An. Effective PSO-Based Hybrid Algorithm for Multiobjective Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 38(4):818–831 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ali M, Siarry P, Pant M. An efficient differential evolution based algorithm for solving multi objective optimization problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(2):404–416 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  9. Li Y, Yang R, Zhao X. Integrated Reactive Power Optimization Method for Active Distribution Networks Based on a Quantum Krill Herd Algorithm. Electric Power Components and Systems, 47(14-15)(2019). [Google Scholar]
  10. Xiaomeng W, Wu X, Yang M. Reactive power optimization of distributed photovoltaic access distribution network based on improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Journal of physics. Conference series, 1634(1) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Z, Cao Y, Le Van Dai, et al. Finding Solutions for Optimal Reactiv e Power Dispatch Problem by a Novel Improved Antlion Optimization Algorithm. Energies, 12(15) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. Patel A N, Jain S. Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based Reactive Power Optimization in Distribution Network. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(10)(2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. Eshan K, Jagadeesh P, Janaka E, et al. Optimal Placement and Sizing of DGs in Distribution Networks Using MLPSO Algorithm. Energies, 13(23)(2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. Mostafa N G, Hossein J, Mojtaba J G, et al. A novel hybrid optimization approach for reactive power dispatch problem considering voltage stability index. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 96 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  15. Lyu Zhong, Zhou Qiang, Cai Yuchang. Reactive power optimization in distribution network with distributed generation on DEIWO algorithm. Power System Protection and Control, 43(4):69–73 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang Y, Li F, Wan Q, et al. Reactive Power Planning Based on Fuzzy Clustering, Gray Code, and Simulated Annealing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(4):2246–2255 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sulaiman M H, Mustafa M W, Shareef H, et al. An application of artificial bee colony algorithm with least squares support vector machine for real and reactive power tracing in deregulated power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 37(1):67–77 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang B, Zhang X, Yu T, et al. Grouped grey wolf optimizer for maximum power point tracking of doubly fed induction generator based wind turbine. Energy Conversion and Management, 427–443 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Song Y, Blaabjerg F. Overview of DFIG-Based Wind Power System Resonances under Weak Networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 32(6):4370–4394 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rahab A, Senani F, Benalla H. Direct Power Control of Brushless Doubly-Fed Induction Generator Used in Wind Energy Conversion System[J]. International Journal of Power Electronics & Drive Systems, 8(1):417 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. Nadour M, Essadki A, Nasser T. Comparative Analysis between PI & Backstepping Control Strategies of DFIG Driven by Wind Turbine. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 7(3):1307–1316 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. Li S. Low-frequency oscillations of wind power systems caused by doubly fed induction generators. Renewable Energy, 104(APR.):129–138 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhigang Zhao, Shuyun Huang, Weiqian Wang. Simplified particle swarm optimization algorithm based on stochastic inertia weights. Computer Application Research, 31(02):361–363 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  24. Jianguo Jiang, Min Tian, Xiangqian Wang, et al. Adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm using perturbed acceleration factor. Journal of Xi’an University of Electronic Science and Technology, 39 (04):74–80 (2012). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.