Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 521, 2024
2024 2nd International Forum on Clean Energy Engineering (FCEE2024)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Environmental Pollution Control and Environmental Chemical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452102001
Published online 06 May 2024
  1. J. Famiglietti, “THE FUTURE OF WATER,” p. 10, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 11, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/trend/archive/spring-2019/a-map-of-the-future-of-water [Google Scholar]
  2. R. M. Pink, Water Rights in Southeast Asia and India. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2016. doi: 10.1057/9781137504234. [Google Scholar]
  3. U. S. Mishra and B. Padhi, “Sustaining the Sustainable Development Goals,” Econ Polit Wkly, vol. 56, no. 34, pp. 30–31, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. “Goal 6 Clean Water and Sanitation,” 2022. Accessed: Jul. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sdg.neda.gov.ph/goal-6/ [Google Scholar]
  5. J. M. Pulhin, R. A. Ibabao, A. C. Rola, and R. V. O. Cruz, “Water Supply and Demand and the Drivers of Change,” 2018, pp. 15–40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70969-7_2. [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Kumar, Y. Masago, B. K. Mishra, and K. Fukushi, “Evaluating future stress due to combined effect of climate change and rapid urbanization for Pasig-Marikina River, Manila,” Groundw Sustain Dev, vol. 6, pp. 227–234, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2018.01.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Brindha and M. Schneider, “Impact of urbanization on groundwater quality,” in GIS and Geostatistical Techniques for Groundwater Science, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 179–196. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815413-7.00013-4. [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Luo, R. Young, and P. Reig, “AQUEDUCT PROJECTED WATER STRESS COUNTRY RANKINGS,” 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct- [Google Scholar]
  9. G. R. A. Paronda, C. P. C. David, and D. C. Apodaca, “River flow pattern and heavy metals concentrations in Pasig River, Philippines as affected by varying seasons and astronomical tides,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing, Nov. 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/344/1/012049. [Google Scholar]
  10. H. N. P. Dayarathne, M. J. Angove, R. Aryal, H. Abuel-Naga, and B. Mainali, “Removal of natural organic matter from source water: Review on coagulants, dual coagulation, alternative coagulants, and mechanisms,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 40. Elsevier Ltd, Apr. 01, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101820. [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Du, X. Li, Y. Yang, Z. Zhou, and X. Fan, “Dual coagulation with floc breakage to alleviate ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by algae organic matter,” Desalination, vol. 493, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114660. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. J. L. Baytamo, K. C. Perez, and M. C. Almendrala, “PASIG RIVER WATER PURIFICATION BY ULTRAFILTRATION: APPLICATION OF DUAL COAGULATION AND ADSORPTION FOR ENHANCED TREATMENT PROCESS,” Dec. 2022, pp. 145–156. doi: 10.5593/sgem2022V/3.2/s12.17. [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Shaylinda Mohd Zin and Z. Azraff Zulkapli, “Application of Dual Coagulant (Alum + Barley) in Removing Colour from Leachate,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 103, p. 06002, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201710306002. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. H. H. Mungondori, T. A. Muchingami, R. T. Taziwa, and N. Chaukura, “Performance intensification of the coagulation process in drinking water treatment,” Water SA, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 154–161, 2021, doi: 10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i2.10911 [Google Scholar]
  15. R. H. Myers, D. C. Montgomery, and C. M. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. S. Rao and B. Kumar, “3D Blade Root Shape Optimization,” in 10th International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, Elsevier, 2012, pp. 173–187. doi: 10.1533/9780857094537.4.173. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Nimesha, C. Hewawasam, D. J. Jayasanka, Y. Murakami, N. Araki, and N. Maharjan, “Effectiveness of natural coagulants in water and wastewater treatment,” Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101–116, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.22034/gjesm.2022.01.08. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. L. Mouritsen, J. T. Davis, and S. C. Jones, “ANOVA Analysis of Student Daily Test Scores in Multi-Day Test Periods.,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:148800905 [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Benalia, K. Derbal, A. Panico, and F. Pirozzi, “Use of acorn leaves as a natural coagulant in a drinking water treatment plant,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.3390/w11010057. [Google Scholar]
  20. L. De Souza Fermino, A. De castro Silva Pedrangelo, P. K. De Matos Silva, R. E. C. De Azevedo, N. U. Yamaguchi, and R. M. Ribeiro, “Water treatment with conventional and alternative coagulants,” Chem Eng Trans, vol. 57, pp. 1189–1194, 2017, doi: 10.3303/CET1757199. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Bratby, Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater Treatment. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Ahmed, G. M. Ayoub, M. Al-Hindi, and F. Azizi, “The Effect of Fast Mixing Conditions on the Coagulation-Flocculation of Highly Turbid Suspensions Using Magnesium Hydroxide Coagulant,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:46984980 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Y. Noordin, V. C. Venkatesh, S. Sharif, S. Elting, and A. Abdullah, “Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel,” J Mater Process Technol, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 46–58, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. L. A. Sarabia and M. C. Ortiz, “Response Surface Methodology,” in Comprehensive Chemometrics, Elsevier, 2009, pp. 345–390. doi: 10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00083-1. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.