EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 530 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 530 (2024) 02003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 530, 2024
2024 14th International Conference on Future Environment and Energy (ICFEE 2024)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Analysis and Restoration of Aquatic Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453002003
Published online 29 May 2024
  1. Cao J J, Cohen A, Hansen J, Lester R, Peterson P, Qvist S A, Xu H J, 2016. Response to nuclear power: serious risks. Science, 354, 6316. [Google Scholar]
  2. Saito S, 2009. Role of nuclear energy to a future society of shortage of energy resources and global warming. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 398(1-3): 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Christoudias T, Proestos Y, Lelieveld J, 2014. Global risk from the atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides by nuclear power plant accidents in the coming decades. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14 (9): 4607–4616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guimarães L S F, Carvalho-Junior L, Façanha G L, Resende N S, Neves L M, Cardoso S J, 2023. Meta-analysis of the thermal pollution caused by coastal nuclear power plants and its effects on marine biodiversity. Marine Pollution Bulletin, DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115452. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin H S, Zhang S Y, Cao R R, Yu S H, Bai W, Zhang R Y, et al., 2023. A review on the risk, prevention and control of cooling water intake blockage in coastal nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.10.009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wheatley S, Sovacool B K, Sornette D, 2016. Reassessing the safety of nuclear power. Energy Research & Social Science, 15. DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.026. [Google Scholar]
  7. Marcus G H, 2019. Comment: Nuclear power around the world. Nature reviews physics. DOI: 10.1038/s42254-019-0020-z [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang J L, Wang Q S, 2017. Future research and development of the fourth generation reactor. Science and technology investment in China, 5: 380. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Li L W, Bai Y S, 2023. Strategic thinking on the “three-step” development of China’s nuclear energy under the goal of “double carbon”. China Nuclear Power Information Network. http://www.heneng.net.cn/index.php/home/hd/infotwo/id/72559/sid/9/catId/169.html. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shellenberger M, 2018. As renewables drive up energy prices, voters in U.S., Asia and Europe are opting for nuclear power. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/11/08/as-renewables-drive-up-energy-prices-voters-in-u-sasia-europeare-opting-for-nuclear-power/#695e2a7f7646. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu F, Zhang Y X, Cao Y, 2010. Effects of thermal drainage from nuclear power plants on Marine ecosystem under global warming. Transaction of oceanology and limnology, 2: 155–161. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6482.2010.02.024. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang F M, Lin J, Zheng B X, 2019. Effects of thermal discharge from coastal nuclear power plants and thermal power plants on the thermocline characteristics in sea areas with different tidal dynamics. Water, 11, 2577. DOI: 10.3390/w11122577 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang X C, Chen X C, Peng X, Zhang L, Qian X Y, Tang J, 2014. The research progress of the impact of thermal discharge from coastal power plants on marine environment. Marine environmental science, 33(6): 972–976. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Hao Y J, Tang D L, 2010. Changes in phytoplankton community structure in response to water temperature increase in Daya Bay, China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 19(8):1994–1800. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.08.006. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Xie Y H, Li T, Jian W J, Hu S M, Tian Y, Liu S, 2015. Influence of ocean warming on the community structure and photosynthetic efficiency of phytoplankton in Daya Bay. Journal of tropical oceanography, 34(2):8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2015.02.004. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu F, Zhang Y X, 2008. The Review on the effects of thermal effluent from nuclear plants on the marine ecosystem. Radiation Protection Bulletin, 28(1):7. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6356.2008.01.001. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Fitt W K, Warner M E, 1995. Bleaching patterns of four species of Caribbean reef corals. Biol Bull, 189:298–307. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Strychar K B, Coates M, Sammarco P W, 2004. Loss of Symbiodinium from bleached Australian scleractinian corals (Acropora hyacinthus, Favites complanata and Porites solida). Mar Freshwater Res, 55:135–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen T R, Yu K F, Shi Q, Chen T G, Wang R, 2011. Effect of global warming and thermal effluents on calcification of the Porites coral in Daya Bay, northern South China Sea. Journal of tropical oceanography, 2011, 30(2): 1–9. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2011.02.001.2011, 30(2): 1-9. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. SER, 2004. SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration Society for Ecological Restoration. Tucson, www.ser.org (Accessed 26.01.16). [Google Scholar]
  21. Moreno-Mateos D, Power M E, Comín F A, Yockteng R, 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001247. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li Z Y, 1982. Prevention and Control of thermal pollution of nuclear power plants. Environmental pollution & control, 4(4): 35–36. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen X Y, Gao H W, Yao X H, Fang H D, Chen Z H, Xu Z Z, 2010. Ecosystem-Based Assessment Indices of Restoration for Daya Bay near a Nuclear Power Plant in South China. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(19):7589–7595. DOI:10.1021/es1008592. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li C H, Xu S N, Du F Y, Lin L, 2015. Responses of the Daya Bay ecosystem to human activities and health assessment. Chinese Fishery Quality and Standards, 5 (1): 1–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.