EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 532 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 532 (2024) 02004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 532, 2024
Second International Conference of Applied Industrial Engineering: Intelligent Production Automation and its Sustainable Development (CIIA 2024)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 15
Section Applied Technological Innovations for Sustainable Industrial Environments
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453202004
Published online 06 June 2024
  1. Z. Shi, Y. Xie, W. Xue, Y. Chen, L. Fu, X. Xu, Smart factory in Industry 4.0, Systems Research and Behavioral Science 37, 607 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Zunino, A. Valenzano, R. Obermaisser, S. Petersen, Factory communications at the dawn of the fourth industrial revolution, Computer Standards & Interfaces 71, 103433 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Liu, A.J. Offutt, C. Ho-Stuart, Y. Sun, M. Ohba, SOFL: A formal engineering methodology for industrial applications, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24, 24 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Ge, Review on data-driven modeling and monitoring for plant-wide industrial processes, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 171, 16 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Soley et al., Model driven architecture, OMG white paper 308, 5 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Moser, M. Pfeiffer, J. Pichler, Domain-specific modeling in industrial automation: Challenges and experiences, in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Modern Software Engineering Methods for Industrial Automation (2014), pp. 42–51 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Pinheiro da Silva, N.W. Paton, UML i: The Unified Modeling Language for Interactive Applications, in International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (Springer, 2000), pp. 117–132 [Google Scholar]
  8. C.E. Pereira, P. Neumann, Industrial Communication Protocols (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 981–999 [Google Scholar]
  9. OPC Foundation, OPC Unified Architecture (2006), accessed on May 2024, https://opcfoundation.org/about/opc-technologies/opc-ua/ [Google Scholar]
  10. Modbus Organization, Modbus Protocol Specification (2006), accessed on May 2024, http://www.modbus.org/docs/ [Google Scholar]
  11. Profibus International, Profibus: The fieldbus for industrial automation (2000), accessed on May 2024, https://www.profibus.com [Google Scholar]
  12. OASIS Standard, MQTT Version 5.0 (2019), accessed on May 2024, https://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v5.0/ [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Jaloudi, Communication Protocols of an Industrial Internet of Things Environment: A Comparative Study, Future Internet 11, 66 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Binder, C. Neureiter, G. Lastro, Towards a model-driven architecture process for developing Industry 4.0 applications, International Journal of Modeling and Optimization 9, 1 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A.A. Teilans, A.V. Romanovs, Y.A. Merkuryev, P.P. Dorogovs, A.Y. Kleins, S.A. Potryasaev, Assessment of cyber physical system risks with domain specific modelling and simulation, 4, 115 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Bruccoleri, S.N. La Diega, G. Perrone, An object-oriented approach for flexible manufacturing control systems analysis and design using the unified modeling language, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 15, 195 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J.M. Gutierrez-Guerrero, J.A. Holgado-Terriza, iMMAS an Industrial Meta-Model for Automation System Using OPC UA, Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika 23, 3 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Luo, S. Hong, R. Lu, Y. Li, X. Zhang, J. Kim, T. Park, M. Zheng, W. Liang, OPC UA-Based Smart Manufacturing: System Architecture, Implementation, and Execution, in Int. Conf. on Enterprise Systems (2017), pp. 281–286 [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Manowska, A. Wycisk, A. Nowrot, J. Pielot, The Use of the MQTT Protocol in Measurement, Monitoring and Control Systems as Part of the Implementation of Energy Management Systems, Electronics 12, 17 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Lee, D.K. Kim, H. Yang, S. Oh, Model transformation between OPC UA and UML, Computer Standards & Interfaces 50, 236 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tech. rep., OPC Foundation (2024), https://opcfoundation.org/developer-tools/specifications-unified-architecture/part-10-programs/ [Google Scholar]
  22. FreeOpcUa, FreeOpcUa Modeler (2016), accessed on May 2024, https://github.com/FreeOpcUa/opcua-modeler [Google Scholar]
  23. Prosys OPC, Prosys OPC UA Java (2017), accessed on May 2024, https://www.prosysopc.com/products/opc-ua-java-sdk/ [Google Scholar]
  24. Prosys OPC, Prosys OPC UA Client for Android (2017), accessed on May 2024, https://www.prosysopc.com/products/opc-ua-android-client/ [Google Scholar]
  25. Node-RED contributors, Node-RED OPC UA (2016), accessed on May 2024, https://flows.nodered.org/node/node-red-contrib-opcua [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.