Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 536, 2024
2024 6th International Conference on Environmental Prevention and Pollution Control Technologies (EPPCT 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Environmental Planning Management and Ecological Construction | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453601001 | |
| Published online | 10 June 2024 | |
- Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Daryanto, A., Song, Z. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 123, 208–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Soopramanien, D., Daryanto, A., & Song, Z. (2023). Urban residents’ environmental citizenship behaviour: The roles of place attachment, social norms and perceived environmental responsibility. Cities, 132, 104097. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Uzzell, D., Pol, E., Badenas, D. (2002). Place identification, social cohesion, and enviornmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior, 34(1), 26–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Hogarth. [Google Scholar]
- Halpenny, E. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 409–421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay, C. M. L., & Schmitt, M. T. (2019). Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Scannell, L., Gifford, R. (2017). The experienced psychological benefits of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 256–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Song, Z., & Soopramanien, D. (2019). Types of place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of urban residents in Beijing. Cities, 84, 112–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., Weber, D. (2010). The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 422–434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., Choi, S. (2021). The place-based approach to recycling intention: Integrating place attachment into the extended theory of planned behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, 105549. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y., Sun, L., Han, B., Liu, P. (2023). The Trajectory of Anthropomorphism and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Serial Mediation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2393. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010b). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 289–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gosling, E., & Williams, K. J. H. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 298–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ramkissoon, H., Graham Smith, L. D., & Weiler, B. (2013). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach. Tourism Management, 36, 552–566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.