EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 540 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 540 (2024) 06013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 540, 2024
1st International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES 2023)
Article Number 06013
Number of page(s) 11
Section Power Converters for Various Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454006013
Published online 21 June 2024
  1. E. Prasad, A. Sudhakar and V. Kumar, “Simulation of five-level inverter fed PMSM based on fast SVPWM,” 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Bengaluru, India, 2012, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/PEDES.2012.6484444. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. H. Arshad and M. Kassas, “A Chaos Based SVPWM technique for B4 Inverter fed Two-Phase Symmetric Induction Motor for THD & EMI improvement at Low Modulation Index,” 2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC), College Station, TX, USA, 2019, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662163. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Pan and J. Huang, “A Hybrid Dead- Time Elimination SVPWM Scheme for Neutral-Point-Clamped Inverters,” 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Power Engineering (REPE), Beijing, China, 2021, pp. 157–162, doi: 10.1109/REPE52765.2021.9617084. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. M. Irfan, P. H. K. Prasad and P. V. Rao, “Simulation of five-level five-phase SVPWM voltage source inverter,” 2010 International Conference on Power, Control and Embedded Systems, Allahabad, India, 2010, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ICPCES.2010.5698659. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shijie Yan, Qun Zhang and Heng Du, “A simplified SVPWM control strategy for PV inverter,” 2012 24th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Taiyuan, 2012, pp. 225–229, doi: 10.1109/CCDC.2012.6244031. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Ayiguzhali, M. Pazilai, Y. Li, L. Xu and W. Wang, “A Modular Multilevel TType Inverter Based on SVPWM for PV System Application,” 2018 2nd IEEE Advanced Information Management,Communicates,Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China, 2018, pp. 177–181, doi: 10.1109/IMCEC.2018.8469272. [Google Scholar]
  7. X. T. Nguyen, Honghua Wang and V. N. Nguyen, “Research on fuzzy PI control for switched reluctance wind power inverter with SVPWM,” 2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, Nanjing, China, 2011, pp. 4342–4345, doi: 10.1109/RSETE.2011.5965292. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Li, F. Lin, Z. Li, W. A. Halang and B. Zhang, “Chaotic SVPWM control and its application in EMI suppression for PV inverters,” 2012 IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications (APWC), Cape Town, South Africa, 2012, pp. 1213–1216, doi: 10.1109/APWC.2012.6324964. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Guzman-Guemez, D. S. Laila and S. M. Sharkh, “State-space approach for modelling and control of a single-phase three-level NPC inverter with SVPWM,” 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Boston, MA, USA, 2016, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741355. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Ding, S. Xie and Y. Tang, “Optimal design of the inductor in Z-source inverter with single phase shoot-through SVPWM strategy,” 2010 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010, pp. 2878–2882, doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2010.5618190. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Zhu, F. Bu, W. Huang and T. Pu, “Analysis and performance of two dual random SVPWM for five-phase inverter,” 2017 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2017, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/ICEMS.2017.8056088. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Wang, L. Yi, S. He, B. Zhang, Z. Yao and B. Wang, “Double-mode modulation based on limited trajectories for ANN-SVPWM in PV grid-connected inverter,” 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Xuzhou, China, 2010, pp. 4272–4277, doi: 10.1109/CCDC.2010.5498367. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Abhiram, P. S. Reddy and P. V. N. Prasad, “Integrated dead-time SVPWM algorithm for indirect vector controlled two-level inverter fed induction motor drive,” 2017 International Conference on Information, Communication, Instrumentation and Control (ICICIC), Indore, India, 2017, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/ICOMICON.2017.8279073. [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Ezzeddine, M. Hamouda and K. Al-Haddad, “Comparative study between different SVPWM algorithms for NPC inverters in terms of common mode voltage reduction,” IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Beijing, China, 2017, pp. 6458–6463, doi: 10.1109/IECON.2017.8217125. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Sakthisudhursun, J. K. Pandit and M. V. Aware, “Simplified center aligned SVPWM for multi-phase inverter using voltage dispersion,” 2016 3rd International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems (ICEES), Chennai, India, 2016, pp. 18–22, doi: 10.1109/ICEES.2016.7510588. [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Chengwu, Z. Xiaomin and J. Qiguang, “Research on SVPWM Inverter Output Control Technology,” 2013 Fifth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Hong Kong, China, 2013, pp. 927–929, doi: 10.1109/ICMTMA.2013.230. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Moinoddin, H. Abu-Rub and A. Iqbal, “Modelling and implementation of SVPWM technique for a thirteen-phase voltage source inverter-sinusoidal output waveform,” 2014 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition - APEC 2014, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2014, pp. 268–273, doi: 10.1109/APEC.2014.6803320. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. N. Uday, M. Chakravarthy. and B. Mangu., “Analysis of H6, HERIC and FB Single-Phase Transformerless Grid-Tied Inverter for minimization of leakage current using SVPWM strategy,” 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Future Electric Transportation (SeFeT), Hyderabad, India, 2022, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/SeFeT55524.2022.9908799. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.