Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01008 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Experimental Investigations From Very Small Strains to Beyond Failure - Advances in Laboratory Testing Techniques (Equipment and Procedures) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454401008 | |
| Published online | 02 July 2024 | |
- ASTM D2845-00. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Deter mination of Pulse Velocities and Ultrasonic Elastic Consta nts of Rock, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000 [Google Scholar]
- Bellotti, R., Jamiolkowski, M., Lo Presti, D. C. F. and O′Neill, D. A. “Anisotropy of small strain stiffness in Ticino sand”, Geotechnique, 46(1), pp. 115–131, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.1.115 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chamorro-Zurita, C., & Ovando-Shelley, E. Anisotropy of lac ustrine soils in a large oedometer equipped with bender ele ments. Soils and Foundations, 60(2), pp. 372–383, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dutta, T. T., Otsubo, M., Kuwano, R., & O’Sullivan, C. Stress wave velocity in soils: Apparent grain-size effect and optimum input frequencies. Geotechnique Letters, 9(4), pp. 340–347, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.18.00219 [Google Scholar]
- Fioravante, Vincenzo. “Anisotropy of small strain stiffness of Ticino and Kenya sands from seismic wave propagation measured in triaxial testing.” Soils and foundations, 40(4), pp. 129–142, 2000. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.40.4_129 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hardin, B. O., & Blandford, G. E. Elasticity of particulate materials. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 115(6), pp. 788–805, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:6(788) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Jong-Sub, and J. Carlos Santamarina. “Bender elements: performance and signal interpretation.” Journal of Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 131(9), pp. 1063–1070, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1063) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J., Otsubo, M., Kawaguchi, Y., & Kuwano, R. Anisotropy in small-strain shear modulus of granular materials: Effects of particle properties and experimental conditions. Soils and Foundations, 62(1), 101105, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2021.101105 [Google Scholar]
- Nemat-Nasser, S., & Takahashi, K. Liquefaction and fabric of sand. Journal of Geotechnical engineering, 110(9), pp. 1291–1306, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:9(1291) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nishimura, S., & Abdiel, M. D. Cataloguing stiffness anisotropy of natural sedimentary soils–From clays to intermediate soils. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 5(2), pp. 101–106, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.v05.021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Otsubo, M., Liu, J., Kawaguchi, Y., Dutta, T. T., & Kuwano, R. Anisotropy of elastic wave velocity influenced by particle shape and fabric anisotropy under K0 condition. Computers and Geotechnics, 128, 103775, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103775 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sadek, T., Lings, M., Dihoru, L., & Wood, D. M. Wave transmission in Hostun sand: multiaxial experiments. Rivista Italiana Geotecnica, 41(2), pp. 69–84, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J., & Gu, X. Q. Shear stiffness of granular material at small strains: does it depend on grain size?. Geotechnique, 63(2), pp. 165–179, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.11.P.083 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, X., & Ni, B. Stress-induced anisotropic G max of sands and its measurement. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 125(9), pp. 741–749, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(741) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.