Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 01025
Number of page(s) 5
Section Experimental Investigations From Very Small Strains to Beyond Failure - Advances in Laboratory Testing Techniques (Equipment and Procedures)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454401025
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Boukpeti, N. and White, D. J. (2017). “Interface shear box tests for assessing axial pipe–soil resistance.” Geotechnique, 67, no. 1: 18–30, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burland J.P. 1993 Closing address. In proceedings of recent large-scale fully instrumented pile tests in clay. Institute of Civil Engineers, London, 590–595 [Google Scholar]
  3. Esrig, M.I. and Kirby, R.C. 1979. “Soil capacity for supporting deep foundation members in clay.” In Behavior of Deep Foundations, ASTM STP 670, edited by R. Lundgren, 27–63. 104. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jardine, R. J. and Lehane, B. M. 1992. “Residual strength characteristics of Bothkennar clay”. Geotechnique, 42, no. 2: 363–367, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1992.42.2.363 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ladd, C. C. and Foott, R. 1974. “New design procedure for stability of soft clay.” J. Geotech. Engng Div. 100, no. FT7: 763–786. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lemos, L. J. L. and Vaughan, P. R. 2000. “Clay – interface shear resistance.” Geotechnique 50, no. 1: 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Martinez, A. and Stutz, H.H. 2019. “Rate effects on the interface shear behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clay.” Geotechnique, 69, no. 9: 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.311 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Randolph, M.F. and Murphy, B.S. 1985. “Shaft capacity of driven piles in clay.” In Offshore Technology Conference, https://doi.org/10.4043/4883-MS [Google Scholar]
  9. Stutz, H.H. and Martinez, A. 2018. “Meso- and macro-scale response of clay-structure interfaces under varying shearing rates. In IS-Atlanta Micro to Macro, 1–5. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.