Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Experimental Investigations From Very Small Strains to Beyond Failure - Advanced Sampling | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454403002 | |
| Published online | 02 July 2024 | |
- Bat A., Blivet J.-C., Levacher D. “Incidence de la procédure de prélèvement des sols fins sur les caractéristiques géotechniques mesurées en laboratoire”, (Impact of sampling procedure on the geotechnical characteristics of fine soil measured in the laboratory), RFG 91, 3–12 (in French), 2000 [Google Scholar]
- Berre, T. “Suggested international procedure for triaxial compression tests”, submitted to ISSMFE Subcommittee on Soil Testing, 6 pages, 1986 [Google Scholar]
- CEN, 2021, EN ISO 22475–1 Geotechnical investigation and testing – Sampling methods and groundwater measurements - Part 1: Technical principles for the sampling of soil, rock and groundwater, 150 pages [Google Scholar]
- CEN, 2007, EN 1997–2, Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2: Ground investigation and testing, 145 pages [Google Scholar]
- Hvorslev J. “Subsurface exploration and sampling of soils for civil engineering purposes”, Rapport ASCE, 521 pages, 1949 [Google Scholar]
- Idel K.H., Muhs H., Von Soos P., “Proposal for quality classes in soil sampling in relation to boring methods and sampling equipment”, Proc. Of the Specialty Session 1, Soil Sampling, 7th ICSMFE, Mexico city, 11–14, 1969 [Google Scholar]
- ISO, 2002, ISO 14688–1, Geotechnical investigation and testing — Identification and classification of soil — Part 1: Identification and description, 18 pages [Google Scholar]
- ISSMFE, “International manual for the sampling of soft cohesive soils, edited by sub-committee on soil sampling” ISSMFE, published by Tokay Univ. Press, 129 pages, 1981 [Google Scholar]
- Kazuo T, Kaneko S “Undisturbed sampling method using thick water-soluble polymer solution Tsuchi-to-Kiso”, Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society [In Japanese] 54(4): 145–148, 2006 [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y.S., Kim Y.C. & Hong S.W., “Improvement of Large Diameter Sampler (KICT type) and Its Application in Korean Site”, International Conference On Site Characterization, pp. 1465–1470, 2008 [Google Scholar]
- Lafond L.-R. “Sur la floculation des limons argileux en présence de l’eau de mer sur la côte de Bretagne” (On the flocculation of clayey silts in the presence of sea water on the Brittany coast,), Revue du Groupe Français des Argiles, V:28–35 (in French), 1953 [Google Scholar]
- La Rochelle P., Sarrailh J., Tavenas F., Roy M., Leroueil S. “Causes of sampling disturbance and design of a new sampler for sensitive soils”, Can. Geotech. J., 18, 52–66, 1981 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Larsson, R. Åhnberg H. & Löfroth H. “A new Swedish largediameter sampler for soft and sensitive clays”, Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4 – Coutinho & Mayne (eds), 2013 [Google Scholar]
- Lefebvre G., Poulin C. “A new method of sampling in sensitive clay”, Can. Geotech. J., 16 (1), 226–233, 1979 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rutledge P.C. “Relation of undisturbed sampling to laboratory testing”, Tran. Am; Soc. C. E. V109 pp. 1155–1183, 1944 [Google Scholar]
- Sandven, R., Husby, E., Husby, J., Roksvåg, K., Stæhli, F., Tellugen, R.. “Development of a Sampler for Measurement of Gas Content in Soils”. Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering, ASCE, J W Port Coast. Oc. Eng. 133. 10.1061/(ASCE) 0733–950X(2007)133:1(3), 2007 [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka H, Sharma P, Tsuchida T, Tanaka M “Comparative study on sample quality using several types of samplers”. Soils and Foundations 36(2): 57–68, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.