EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 04005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Experimental Investigations From Very Small Strains to Beyond Failure - Data Interpretation and Geotechnical Imaging
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454404005
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Beemer, R. D., Bandini-Maeder, A. N. Shaw, J. Lebrec, U., Cassidy, M. J., 2018. “The granular structure of two marine carbonate sediments.” Proc OMAE2018. Madrid: ASME. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beemer, R. D., Li, L., Leonti, A., Shaw, J., Fonseca, J., Valova, I., Iskander, M., Pilskaln, C. H., 2022. “Comparison of 2D Optical Imaging and 3D Microtomography Shape Measurements of a Coastal Bioclastic Calcareous Sand.” J. Imaging, 8 (3): 20. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ching, J., Phoon. K.-K., 2015. “Constructing multivariate distributions for soil parameters.” Risk Reliab. Geotech. Eng., 3–76. Taylor & Francis Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
  4. Coop, M. R., 1990. The mechanics of uncemented carbonate sands. Geotechnique 40, No. 4, 607–626, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1680/geot.1990.40.4.607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D18 Committee. 2016. Standard Practice for Characterization of Particles; Standard. West Conshohocken, PA, USA,: ASTM. [Google Scholar]
  6. DGRNE - Direccao Geral dos Recursos Naturais e Energia Sao Tome & Principe - technical report, “Tipos de solos e suas classificacoes” https://dgrne.org/directorate/directorategeology, accessed August 2022 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fonseca, J., Nadimi, S., Reyes-Aldasoro, C. C., O’Sullivan, C., Coop, M. R., 2016. Image-based investigation into the primary fabric of stress transmitting particles in sand. Soils Found. 56, No. 5, 818–834. [Google Scholar]
  8. Frossard, E.,1979. Effect of sand grain shape on interparticle friction; indirect measurements by Rowe’s stress dilatancy theory. Geotechnique 29, No. 3, 341–350, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1680/geot.1979.29.3.341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Holtz, R., Kovacs, W., 1981. An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs. ISO. 2008. ISO 9276–6 Representation of Results of Particle Size Analysis—Part 6: Descriptive and Quantitative Representation of Particle Shape and Morphology. [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson, N. L. 1949. “Systems of Frequency Curves Generated by Methods of Translation.” Biometrika, 36 (1/2): 29. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332539. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kong, D., Fonseca, J. Quantification of the morphology of shelly carbonate sands using 3D images. Geotechnique 2018, 68, 249–261. DOI:10.1680/jgeot.16.p.278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kong, D., Fonseca, J., 2019. On the kinematics of shelly carbonate sand using X-ray micro tomography. [Google Scholar]
  13. Engineering Geology, 261, pp. 105268–105268. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105268 [Google Scholar]
  14. Krumbein, W. C., 1941. “Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles.” J. Sediment. Res., 11 (2): 64–72. SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, L., R. D. Beemer, and M. Iskander. 2021. “Granulometry of Two Marine Calcareous Sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., 147 (3): 04020171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002431. [Google Scholar]
  16. Miura, K., Maeda, K., Furukawa, M., Toki, S., 1997. Physical characteristics of sand with different primary properties. Soils and Foundations 37 (3), 53–64 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Otsu, N. 1979. “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 9 (1): 62–66. IEEE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rorato, R., Arroyo, M., Ando, E., Gens. A., 2019. “Sphericity measures of sand grains.” Eng. Geol., 254: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Semple, R.M.,1988. The mechanical properties of carbonate soils. In Engineering for calcareous sediments (eds R. J. Jewell and D. C. Andrews), pp. 807–836. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Balkema. [Google Scholar]
  20. Santamarina, J. C., Cho, G. C., 2004. Soil behaviour: the role of particle shape. In Advances in geotechnical engineering: the Skempton conference (eds R. J. Jardine, D. M. Potts and K. G. Higgins), pp. 604–617. London, UK: ICE Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharma, S. S., Ismail, M. A., 2006. “Monotonic and cyclic behavior of two calcareous soils of different origins.” J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 132 (12): 1581–1591. ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:12(1581). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Virtanen, P., R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, İ. Polat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, C. R. Harris, A. M. Archibald, A. H. Ribeiro, F. Pedregosa, P. van Mulbregt, and SciPy 1.0 Contributors. 2020. “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python.” Nat. Methods, 17: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wadell, H., 1935. “Volume, shape, and roundness of quartz particles.” J. Geol., 43 (3): 250–280. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/624298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zingg, T., 1935. “Beitrag zur Schotteranalyse.” PhD Thesis. ETH Zurich (in German). [Google Scholar]
  25. Zuriguel, I., Mullin, T., Rotter, J. M., 2007. Effect of particle shape on the stress dip under a sandpile. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, No. 2, 028001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.