EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 13004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 13004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Behaviour, Characterization and Modelling of Various Geomaterials and Interfaces - Non-Textbook Soils
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454413004
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. ASTM. 2011. “Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading.” 2435. ASTM 2435. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM D2435. [Google Scholar]
  2. ———. 2014. “Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer.” 584. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM D854. [Google Scholar]
  3. ———. 2017a. “Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).” D2487. ASTM D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM D2487. [Google Scholar]
  4. ———. 2017b. “Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils.” D4318. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM D4318. [Google Scholar]
  5. ———. 2020a. “Standard Test Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils.” Norma técnica 7181. ASTM D7181. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM D7181. [Google Scholar]
  6. ———. 2020b. “Standard Tests Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compressio Test for Cohesive Soils.” Norma técnica 4767. ASTM D4767. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM D4767. [Google Scholar]
  7. ———. 2021. “Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 Ft-Lbf/Ft3 (600 KN-m/M3)).” D698. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM D698. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carrera, A., M. Coop, and R. Lancellotta. 2011. “Influence of Grading on the Mechanical Behaviour of Stava Tailings.” Géotechnique 61 (11): 935–46. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Consoli, Nilo Cesar, Jordanna Chamon Vogt, João Paulo Sousa Silva, Helder Mansur Chaves, Hugo Carlos Scheuermann Filho, Eclesielter Batista Moreira, and Andres Lotero. 2022. “Behaviour of Compacted Filtered Iron Ore Tailings–Portland Cement Blends: New Brazilian Trend for Tailings Disposal by Stacking.” Applied Sciences 12 (2): 836. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020836. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coop, M. R. 1990. “The Mechanics of Uncemented Carbonate Sands.” Géotechnique 40 (4): 607–26. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.4.607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crystal, C, and C Hore. 2018. “Filter-Pressed Dry Stacking: Design Considerations Based on Practical Experience.” In Tailings and Mine Waste Conference. Keystone, Colorado, USA. [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, Michael. 2011. “Filtered Dry Stacked Tailings : The Fundamentals.” In Tailings and Mine Waste Conference. Vancouver, Canada: The University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0107683. [Google Scholar]
  13. Edraki, Mansour, Thomas Baumgartl, Emmanuel Manlapig, Dee Bradshaw, Daniel M. Franks, and Chris J. Moran. 2014. “Designing Mine Tailings for Better Environmental, Social and Economic Outcomes: A Review of Alternative Approaches.” Journal of Cleaner Production 84 (December): 411–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.079. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Furnell, Erin, Ksenia Bilaniuk, Matthew Goldbaum, Mohammed Shoaib, Omar Wani, Xinyi Tian, Zhirong [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Darryel Boucher, and Erin Rae Bobicki. 2022. “Dewatered and Stacked Mine Tailings: A Review.” ACS ES&T Engineering 2 (5): 728–45. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c00480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gomes, Reinaldo Brandao, Giorgio De Tomi, and Paulo Santos Assis. 2016. “Iron Ore Tailings Dry Stacking in Pau Branco Mine, Brazil.” Journal of Materials Research and Technology 5 (4): 339–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2016.03.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferies, Michael. 2021. “On the Fundamental Nature of the State Parameter.” Géotechnique, November, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.20.P.228. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ladd, Rs. 1978. “Preparing Test Specimens Using Undercompaction.” Geotechnical Testing Journal 1 (1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lupo, J., and J. Hall. 2011. “Dry Stack Tailings – Design Considerations.” In Tailings and Mine Waste ‘10: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste, Vail, Colorado, USA, 17 – 20 October 2010. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Spitz, KARLHEINZ. TRUDINGER, and John Trudinger. 2019. MINING AND THE ENVIRONMENT: From Ore to Metal, 2 Edition. Place of publication not identified: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Suits, L D, Tc Sheahan, Jd Frost, and J-Y Park. 2003. “A Critical Assessment of the Moist Tamping Technique.” Geotechnical Testing Journal 26 (1): 9850. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11108J. [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor, Donald W. 1948. Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  23. Viana da Fonseca, António, Diana Cordeiro, Fausto Molina-Gómez, Davide Besenzon, António Fonseca, and Cristiana Ferreira. 2022. “The Mechanics of Iron Tailings from Laboratory Tests on Reconstituted Samples Collected in Post-Mortem Dam I in Brumadinho.” Soils and Rocks 45 (2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2022.001122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yamamuro, Jerry A., Paul A. Bopp, and Poul V. Lade. 1996. “One-Dimensional Compression of Sands at High Pressures.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 122 (2): 147–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(147). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yamamuro, Jerry A., and Poul V. Lade. 1996. “Drained Sand Behavior in Axisymmetric Tests at High Pressures.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 122 (2): 109–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(109). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.