Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 546, 2024
2024 2nd International Conference on Green Building (ICoGB 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01006 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Green Building Design and Environmental Sustainability | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454601006 | |
Published online | 09 July 2024 |
- Felicioni Licia, Lupíšek Antonin, Gaspari Jacopo (2023). Exploring the Common Ground of Sustainability and Resilience in the Building Sector: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of Building Rating Systems, Sustainability, 15, 884 - DOI: 10.3390/su15010884. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Xianglin Li, Wei Feng, Xiaojing Liu, Yue Yang (2023). A comparative analysis of green building rating systems in China and the United States, Sustainable Cities and Society 93, 104520 - DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Crawley Drury, Aho Ilari (1999). Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends, Building Research & Information, Volume 27, 1999 - Issue4-5: Assessing the environmental performance of buildings: Green Building Challenge ’ 98 Pages 300–308 - DOI: 10.1080/096132199369417. [Google Scholar]
- Asdrubali Francesco, et al. (2022). A Round Robin Test on the dynamic simulation and the LEED protocol evaluation of a green building, Sustainable Cities and Society 78, 103654 - DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ascione Fabrizio, et al. (2022). Building rating systems: A novel review about capabilities, current limits and open issues, Sustainable Cities and Society 76, 103498 - DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Shan Ming, Hwang Bon-gang (2018). Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research Efforts, Sustainable Cities and Society 39, 172–180 - DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.034. [Google Scholar]
- Asdrubali Francesco, et al. (2015). A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings. Building and Environment 86, 98e108 - DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.001 [Google Scholar]
- Berardi Umberto (2012). Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings. Sustainable Development, 20, 411 - DOI: 10.1002/sd.532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Awadh Omair (2017). Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS and Estidama critical analysis. Journal of Building Engineering 11 (2017) 25–29 - DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ding Grace K.C. (2008). Sustainable Construction-The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools. J. Environ. Manag., 86, 451–464 - DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- BREEAM (2023). Building research establishment environmental assessment method. http://www.breeam.org [Google Scholar]
- LEED (2023). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. http://www.gbcitalia.org [Google Scholar]
- ITACA (2023). Innovazione e Trasparenza degli Appalti e la Compatibilità Ambientale. http://www.itaca.org/ - (in italian) [Google Scholar]
- DL104 (2014). Decreto Legislativo n.104 del 2014, Art. 2 lett. F. (in italian) [Google Scholar]
- Law n.220 (2012). LEGGE 11 dicembre 2012, n. 220 - Modifiche alla disciplina del condominio negli edifici. (12G0241) (GU Serie Generale n.293 del 17-12-2012). (in italian) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.