EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 546 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 546 (2024) 02003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 546, 2024
2024 2nd International Conference on Green Building (ICoGB 2024)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Green Building Technology and Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454602003
Published online 09 July 2024
  1. S. Lenzholzer, S. de Vries, Exploring outdoor thermal perception a revised model. Int. J. Biometeorol. 64(2), 293–300 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01777-z [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. V.M. Barthelmes, C. Becchio, S.P. Corgnati, Occupant behavior lifestyles in a residential nearly zero energy building: Effect on energy use and thermal comfort. Sci. Technol. Built Environ. 22(7), 960–975 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2016.1197758 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Song, Y. Liu, Study on Mechanism of Climate Response and Ecological Restoration in High-Density Urban Environment. Design and Technological Applications in Sustainable Architecture: The perspective of China, Japan, Singapore and Thailand, 9–28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80034-5_2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Li, H. Yin, M. Qu, I. Trivers, Outdoor Comfort in Public Spaces, a Critical Review. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Jiang, N. Li, A. Yongga, et al., Short-term effects of natural view and daylight from windows on thermal perception, health, and energy-saving potential. Build. Environ. 208, 108575 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108575 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Schweiker, G.M. Huebner, B.R.M. Kingma, et al., Drivers of diversity in human thermal perception A review for holistic comfort models. Temperature 5(4), 308–342 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2018.1534490 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Wu, J. Cui, X. Xu, D. Song, The influence of virtual environment on thermal perception: physical reaction and subjective thermal perception on outdoor scenarios in virtual reality. Int. J. Biometeorol. 67(8), 1291–1301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02495-3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. W.H. Ko, S. Schiavon, H. Zhang, et al., The impact of a view from a window on thermal comfort, emotion, and cognitive performance. Build. Environ. 175, 106779 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106779 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Song, Y. Xiao, R. Tu, S. Yin, Effects of thermal perception on restorative benefits by green space exposure: A pilot study in hot-humid China. Urban Climate 53, 101767 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101767 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Fu, X. Dong, Y.C. Wu, Y. Jian, Spatial Differentiation and Implementation Mechanism of Sustainable Development Goals from the Perspective of Ecosystem Services. Available at SSRN 4509456 (2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4509456 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Li, N. Liu, The perception, optimization strategies and prospects of outdoor thermal comfort in China: A review. Build. Environ. 170, 106614 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106614 [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Wang, G. Liu, S. Hu, et al., Experimental investigation about the thermal effect of color on thermal sensation and comfort. Energy Build. 173, 710–718 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Liu, C. Xu, Y. Qiao, C. Jiang, W. Chen, News Recommendation with Attention Mechanism. J. Ind. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2(1), 21–26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10635481 [Google Scholar]
  14. R. de Dear, Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia. Build. Res. & Info. 39(2), 108–117 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.552269 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Potchter, P. Cohen, T.P. Lin, A. Matzarakis, Outdoor human thermal perception in various climates: A comprehensive review of approaches, methods and quantification. Sci. Total Environ. 631, 390–406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. W.H. Ko, S. Schiavon, H. Zhang, L.T. Graham, G. Brager, I. Mauss, Y.W. Lin, The impact of a view from a window on thermal comfort, emotion, and cognitive performance. Build. Environ. 175, 106779 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106779 [Google Scholar]
  17. İ. Erkan, Cognitive response and how it is affected by changes in temperature. Build. Res. & Info. 49(4), 399–416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2020.1800439 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. He, M. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, S.M. Hsiang, G. Chen, J. Chen, Exploit social distancing in construction scheduling: Visualize and optimize space-time-workforce tradeoff. J. Manage. Eng. 38(4), 04022027 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.19435479.000103 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Wu, The Impact of Public Green Space Views on Indoor Thermal Perception and Environment Control Behavior of Residents-A Survey Study in Shanghai. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 12(3), 131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n3p131 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Yeom, J.H. Choi, S.H. Kang, Investigation of the physiological differences in the immersive virtual reality environment and real indoor environment: Focused on skin temperature and thermal sensation. Build. Environ. 154, 44–54 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Chinazzo, K. Chamilothori, J. Wienold, et al., Temperature-color interaction: subjective indoor environmental perception and physiological responses in virtual reality. Human Factors 63(3), 474–502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819892383 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Vittori, I. Pigliautile, A.L. Pisello, Subjective thermal response driving indoor comfort perception: A novel experimental analysis coupling building information modeling and virtual reality. J. Build. Eng. 41, 102368 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102368 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Hongpeng, W. Zhifang, J. Hua, W. Lu, Emotional Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Park Users: A Case Study of South China Botanical Garden and Yuexiu Park. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 57(6), 1108–1120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2021.092 [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Zakšek, K. Oštir, Ž. Kokalj, Sky-view factor as a relief visualization technique. Remote Sens. 3(2), 398–415 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3020398 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Zhang, M. Su, B. Hong, C. Wang, K. Li, Interaction of emotional regulation and outdoor thermal perception: A pilot study in a cold region of this country. Build. Environ. 198, 107870 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107870 [Google Scholar]
  26. B.W. Atkinson, Numerical modeling of urban heat-island intensity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 109, 285–310 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025820326672 [Google Scholar]
  27. Y. Wang, Y.S. Lin, Public participation in urban design with augmented reality technology based on indicator evaluation. Front. Virtual Reality 4, 1071355 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1071355 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Zhuang, J. Huang, F. Li, et al., Psychological adaptation to thermal environments and its effects on thermal sensation. Physiol. Behav. 113724 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113724 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Kuper, Effects of flowering, foliation, and autumn colors on preference and restorative potential for designed digital landscape models. Environ. Behav. 52(5), 544–576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518811424 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Hasler, S.E. Suesstrunk, Measuring colorfulness in natural images. In Human vision and electronic imaging VIII (Vol. 5007, pp. 87–95), SPIE (2003, June). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.477378 [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Kellert, E. Calabrese, The practice of biophilic design. London: Terrapin Bright LLC, 3, 21–46 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Kent, S. Schiavon, Evaluation of the effect of landscape distance seen in window views on visual satisfaction. Build. Environ. 183, 107160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107160 [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. Yao, Z. Lian, W. Liu, Q. Shen, Experimental study on physiological responses and thermal comfort under various ambient temperatures. Physiol. Behav. 93(1-2), 310–321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.09.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. D. Watson, L.A. Clark, A. Tellegen, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. T. Zhang, M. Su, B. Hong, C. Wang, K. Li, Interaction of emotional regulation and outdoor thermal perception: A pilot study in a cold region of China. Build. Environ. 198, 107870 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  36. Y. Tang, F. Gao, C. Wang, M.M. Huang, M. Wu, H. Li, Z. Li, Vertical greenery system (VGS) renovation for sustainable arcade-housing: Building energy efficiency analysis based on digital twin. Sustainability 15(3), 2310 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.