Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 546, 2024
2024 2nd International Conference on Green Building (ICoGB 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Building Materials and Retrofit | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454603003 | |
| Published online | 09 July 2024 | |
- G. Churkina et al., “Buildings as a global carbon sink,” Nature Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 4. Nature Research, pp. 269–276, (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4. [Google Scholar]
- F. Pittau, G. Lumia, N. Heeren, G. Iannaccone, and G. Habert, “Retrofit as a carbon sink: The carbon storage potentials of the EU housing stock,” J Clean Prod, vol. 214, pp. 365–376 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. V. W. Appels, J. G. van den Brandhof, J. Dijksterhuis, G. W. de Kort, and H. A. B. Wösten, “Fungal mycelium classified in different material families based on glycerol treatment,” Communications Biology 2020 3:1, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–5, (2020). doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1064-4. [Google Scholar]
- E. Soh, Z. Y. Chew, N. Saeidi, A. Javadian, D. Hebel, and H. Le Ferrand, “Development of an Extrudable Paste to Build Mycelium-Bound Composites. (18) (PDF) Tangled Tales of Mycelium and Architecture: Learning From Failure.,” Mater. Des., vol. 195, (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109058. [Google Scholar]
- F. V. W. Appels, S. Camere, M. M., E. Karana, K. M. B. Jansen, and J. Dijksterhuis, “Fabrication Factors Influencing Mechanical, Moistureand Water-Related Properties of Mycelium-Based Composites.,” Mater. Des., vol. 161, pp. 64–71, (2019). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Haneef, L. Ceseracciu, C. Canale, I. S. Bayer, J. A. Heredia-Guerrero, and A. Athanassiou, “Advanced Materials From Fungal Mycelium: Fabrication and Tuning of Physical Properties,” Sci Rep, vol. 7, (2017). doi: 10.1038/SREP41292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. H. Arifin and Y. Yusuf, “Mycelium fibers as new resource for environmental sustainability,” Procedia Eng, vol. 53, pp. 504–508, (2013). doi: 10.1016/J.PROENG.2013.02.065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Abhijith, A. Ashok, and C. R. Rejeesh, “Sustainable packaging applications from mycelium to substitute polystyrene: a review,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2139–2145, (2018). doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2017.09.211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Jones et al., “Thermal degradation and fire properties of fungal mycelium and mycelium-biomass composite materials.,” Sci. Rep., no. 8. (2018) [Google Scholar]
- Jones, M., Mautner, A., Luenco, S., Bismarck, A., & John, S., Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review. Materials & Design, 187, 108397. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2019.108397 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Van Wylick, A., Elsacker, E., Yap, L. L., Peeters, E., & de Laet, L., Mycelium Composites and their Biodegradability: An Exploration on the Disintegration of Mycelium-Based Materials in Soil. Bio-Based Building Materials, 1, 652–659. (2022). https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/CTA.1.652 [Google Scholar]
- D. S. Mardijanti, E. N. Megantara, A. Bahtiar, and S. Sunardi (2021), “Turning the Cocopith Waste into Myceliated Biocomposite to Make an Insulator,” Int J Biomater, vol. 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/6630657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Xing, M. Brewer, H. El-Gharabawy, G. Griffith, and P. Jones, “Growing and testing mycelium bricks as building insulation materials,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 121, no. 2, p. 022032, (2018). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/121/2/022032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Joey Yang, F. Zhang, B. Still, M. White, and P. Amstislavski, “Physical and Mechanical Properties of Fungal Mycelium-Based Biofoam,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 29, no. 7, (2017). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001866. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.