An optimization of thermal, visual and energy indicators for retrofit with photobioreactors in the mediterranean climate

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 546, 2024 2024 2^nd International Conference on Green Building (ICoGB 2024)


Article Number		03006
Number of page(s)		5
Section		Building Materials and Retrofit
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454603006
Published online		09 July 2024

R.W. Wimbadi, R. Djalante, From decarbonization to low carbon development and transition: A systematic literature review of the conceptualization of moving toward net-zero carbon dioxide emission (1995-2019). J. Clean. Prod. 256: 120307 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
K. Ahmed Ali, M.I. Ahmad, Y. Yusup, Issues, impacts, and mitigations of carbon dioxide emissions in the building sector. Sustain., 12(18): 7427 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Kanyilmaz, F. Berto, I. Paoletti, R. J. Caringal, S. Mora, Nature-inspired optimization of tubular joints for metal 3D printing. Struct Multidisc Optim. 63: 767–787 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
U.B. Singh, A.S. Ahluwalia Microalgae: A promising tool for carbon sequestration. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 18:73–95 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A. Tallou, K. Aziz, M. ElAchaby, S. Karim, F. Aziz Biointelligent quotient house as an algae-based green building. In Handbook of Algal Biofuels, (Elsevier, 2021). [Google Scholar]
M. Sedighi, P. Pourmoghaddam Qhazvini, M. Amidpour, Algae-Powered Buildings: A Review of an Innovative, Sustainable Approach in the Built Environment. Sustain. 15: 3729 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
K. Warren, J. Milovanovic, K. H. Kim, Effect of a Microalgae Facade on Design Behaviors: A Pilot Study with Architecture Students. Buildings, 13, 611 (2023). [Google Scholar]
M. Talaei, A. Prieto, A review on performance of sustainable microalgae photobioreactor façades technology: exploring challenges and advantages Archit. Sci. Rev. (2024). [Google Scholar]
E. Todisco, J. Louveau, C. Thobie, E. Dechandol, S. Durécu, L. Herve, M. Titica, J. Pruvost, Dynamic model for temperature prediction in a façade-integrated photobioreactor. Chem Eng Res Des, 181, 371–383 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
E. Negev, A. Yezioro, M. Polikovsky, A. Kribus, J. Cory, L. Shashua-Bar, A. Golberg, Algae window for reducing energy consumption of building structures in the Mediterranean city of Tel-Aviv. Israel. Energy Build., 204, 109460 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
V.R.M. Lo Verso, M.H.S. Javadi, S. Pagliolico, C. Carbonaro, G. Sassib, Photobioreactors as a dynamic shading system conceived for an outdoor workspace of the state library of queensland in brisbane: study of daylighting performances. J. Daylighting. 6(2), 148–168 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Talaei, M. Mahdavinejad, R. Azari, A. Prieto, H. Sangin, Multi-objective optimization of buildingintegrated microalgae photobioreactors for energy and daylighting performance. J. Build. Eng. 42, 102832 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
J. Lee, Multi-objective optimization case study with active and passive design in building engineering. Struct Multidisc Optim 59, 507–519 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Y. Yaman. N. Altunacar, A. Tokuç, G. Kokturk, I. Deniz. M. A. Ezan, Effects of Photobioreactor Façades on Thermal and Visual Performance of An Office in Izmir. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A Applied Sciences and Engineering (2022). [Google Scholar]
G. Köktürk, Y. Yaman, A. Tokuç. Parametric Analysis of The Effect of a Biomass Producing Façade Element on Energy, Lighting and Thermal Comfort in Ankara Climate, EKSEN Dokuz Eylul University Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 3(1): 20–33 (2022). (in Turkish). [Google Scholar]
A.S. Çıldır, A. Tokuç, G. Köktürk, Design approaches for retrofiting offices to reach nearly zero energy: A case study in the Mediterranean climate. Energy Sustain Dev. 58, 167–181 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Y. Yaman, Evaluation of Possibilities to Integrate Photosynthetic Organisms into Building Facades. Master Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey, 2022. (Unpublished) (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
ASHRAE Tech. Rep. American Society of Heating. Ventilating. and Air Conditioning Engineers guideline 14. measurement of energy and demand savings (2014). [Google Scholar]
ASHRAE. The 2001 ASHRAE handbook: fundamentals. (Atlanta, GA, 2001). [Google Scholar]
ASHRAE Standard 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating. Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. (Atlanta, 2004). [Google Scholar]
N. K. Muthumanickam, N. Brown, J.P. Duarte, T. W. Simpson, Multidisciplinary design optimization in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction: a detailed review and call for collaboration. Struct Multidisc. Optim. 66, 239 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
E. Giouri, M. Tenpierik, M. Turrin, Zero energy potential of a high-rise office building in a Mediterranean climate: Using multi-objective optimization to understand the impact of design decisions towards zero-energy high-rise buildings. Energy Build. 209, 109666 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. L. Pagliolico, V. R. M. Lo Verso, M. Zublena, L. Giovannini, Preliminary results on a novel photobio-screen as a shading system in a kindergarten: Visible transmittance, visual comfort and energy demand for lighting. Sol Energy. 185, 41–58 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Talaei, M. Mahdavinejad, R. Azari, Thermal and energy performance of a user-responsive microalgae bioreactive façade for climate adaptability. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 52, 101894 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.