EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 547 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 547 (2024) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 547, 2024
International Conference on Sustainable Green Energy Technologies (ICSGET 2024)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Electronic and Electrical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454702001
Published online 09 July 2024
  1. S. T. Bryant, K. Straker, and C. Wrigley, “The need for sectoral transition design: A case of the shift to renewable energy,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 198, p. 122930, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122930. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Viebahn, O. Soukup, S. Samadi, J. Teubler, K. Wiesen, and M. Ritthoff, “Assessing the need for critical minerals to shift the German energy system towards a high proportion of renewables,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 655–671, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Wang, L. Zhuang, S. Cheng, Y. Zhang, and S. Cheng, “Spatiotemporal variation and convergence analysis of China’s regional energy security,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 189, p. 113923, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113923. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Yang, P. E. Campana, and J. Yan, “Potential of unsubsidized distributed solar PV to replace coal-fired power plants, and profits classification in Chinese cities,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 131, p. 109967, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109967. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Aghaei, N. M. Kumar, A. Eskandari, H. Ahmed, A. K. V. de Oliveira, and S. S. Chopra, “Solar PV systems design and monitoring,” in Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 117–145. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819610-6.00005-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Prince Winston, K. Ganesan, P. K. B, D. Samithas, and C. B. Baladhanautham, “Experimental investigation on output power enhancement of partial shaded solar photovoltaic system,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, pp. 1–17, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1779872. [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Lappalainen and S. Valkealahti, “Effects of irradiance transition characteristics on the mismatch losses of different electrical PV array configurations,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 248–254, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Lappalainen and S. Valkealahti, “Photovoltaic mismatch losses caused by moving clouds,” Solar Energy, vol. 158, pp. 455–461, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. N. Prasad et al., “Power management in hybrid ANFIS PID based AC–DC microgrids with EHO based cost optimized droop control strategy,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 15081–15094, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Aljafari, P. K. Balachandran, D. Samithas, and S. B. Thanikanti, “Solar photovoltaic converter controller using opposition-based reinforcement learning with butterfly optimization algorithm under partial shading conditions,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 28, pp. 72617–72640, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27261-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V. V. Ramana, A. Mudlapur, R. V. Damodaran, B. Venkatesaperumal, and S. Mishra, “Global Peak Tracking of Photovoltaic Array Under Mismatching Conditions Using Current Control,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 313–320, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TEC.2018.2873667. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Mohapatra, B. Nayak, P. Das, and K. B. Mohanty, “A review on MPPT techniques of PV system under partial shading condition,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 80, pp. 854–867, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.083. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Srinivasan, S. Devakirubakaran, and B. Meenakshi Sundaram, “Mitigation of mismatch losses in solar PV system – Two-step reconfiguration approach,” Solar Energy, vol. 206, pp. 640–654, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Alwar, D. Samithas, M. S. Boominathan, P. K. Balachandran, and L. Mihet-Popa, “Performance Analysis of Thermal Image Processing-Based Photovoltaic Fault Detection and PV Array Reconfiguration—A Detailed Experimentation,” Energies (Basel), vol. 15, no. 22, p. 8450, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15228450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. B. Thanikanti, P. K. B, D. S, B. Aljafari, and I. Colak, “A dynamic mismatch loss mitigation algorithm with dual input dual output converter for solar PV systems,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 251, p. 112163, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.112163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Durango-Flórez, D. González-Montoya, L. A. Trejos-Grisales, and C. A. Ramos-Paja, “PV Array Reconfiguration Based on Genetic Algorithm for Maximum Power Extraction and Energy Impact Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 3764, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14073764. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T. S. Babu, J. P. Ram, T. Dragicevic, M. Miyatake, F. Blaabjerg, and N. Rajasekar, “Particle Swarm Optimization Based Solar PV Array Reconfiguration of the Maximum Power Extraction Under Partial Shading Conditions,” IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–85, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2714905. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Prince Winston, S. Kumaravel, B. Praveen Kumar, and S. Devakirubakaran, “Performance improvement of solar PV array topologies during various partial shading conditions,” Solar Energy, vol. 196, pp. 228–242, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Devakirubakaran, R. Verma, C. Bharatiraja, and L. Mihet-Popa, “Performance Evaluation of Static PV Array Configurations for Mitigating Mismatch Losses,” IEEE Access, pp. 1–1, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3274684. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. R. Pendem and S. Mikkili, “Modeling, simulation and performance analysis of solar PV array configurations (Series, Series–Parallel and Honey-Comb) to extract maximum power under Partial Shading Conditions,” Energy Reports, vol. 4, pp. 274–287, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.03.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Mohammadnejad, A. Khalafi, and S. M. Ahmadi, “Mathematical analysis of total-cross-tied photovoltaic array under partial shading condition and its comparison with other configurations,” Solar Energy, vol. 133, pp. 501–511, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Sagar, D. Pathak, P. Gaur, and V. Jain, “A Su Do Ku puzzle based shade dispersion for maximum power enhancement of partially shaded hybrid bridge-link-total-cross-tied PV array,” Solar Energy, vol. 204, pp. 161–180, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C.-E. Ye, C.-C. Tai, and Y.-P. Huang, “Disperse Partial Shading Effect of Photovoltaic Array by Means of the Modified Complementary SuDoKu Puzzle Topology,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, no. 13, p. 4910, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16134910. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Dhanalakshmi and N. Rajasekar, “Dominance square based array reconfiguration scheme for power loss reduction in solar PhotoVoltaic (PV) systems,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 156, pp. 84–102, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Dhanalakshmi and N. Rajasekar, “A novel Competence Square based PV array reconfiguration technique for solar PV maximum power extraction,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 174, pp. 897–912, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.077. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Srinivasan et al., “L-Shape Propagated Array Configuration With Dynamic Reconfiguration Algorithm for Enhancing Energy Conversion Rate of Partial Shaded Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 97661–97674, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3094736. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. S. K. Cherukuri et al., “Power Enhancement in Partial Shaded Photovoltaic System Using Spiral Pattern Array Configuration Scheme,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 123103–123116, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3109248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. X. H. Nguyen and M. P. Nguyen, “Mathematical modeling of photovoltaic cell/module/arrays with tags in Matlab/Simulink,” Environmental Systems Research, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 24, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1186/s40068-015-0047-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Ma, W. Gu, L. Shen, and M. Li, “An improved and comprehensive mathematical model for solar photovoltaic modules under real operating conditions,” Solar Energy, vol. 184, pp. 292–304, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.089. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.