EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 547 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 547 (2024) 02008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 547, 2024
International Conference on Sustainable Green Energy Technologies (ICSGET 2024)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 9
Section Electronic and Electrical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454702008
Published online 09 July 2024
  1. A. Leitner, W. Wehrmeyer, and C. France, “The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding,” Manag. Res. Rev., 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Wang, T. Shen, Y. Chen, and A. Carmeli, “CEO environmentally responsible leadership and firm environmental innovation: A socio-psychological perspective,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 126, pp. 327–340, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. N. Adger, I. Brown, and S. Surminski, “Advances in risk assessment for climate change adaptation policy,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 376, no. 2121, p. 20180106, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0106. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. N. Jones, “An Environmental Risk Assessment/Management Framework for Climate Change Impact Assessments,” p. 34. [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Phung, H. H. Trinh, T. H. Nguyen, and V. Q. Trinh, “Top‐management compensation and environmental innovation strategy,” Bus. Strategy Environ., p. bse.3209, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/bse.3209. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. F. M. Streit et al., “Adsorption of ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and paracetamol onto activated carbon prepared from effluent treatment plant sludge of the beverage industry,” Chemosphere, vol. 262, p. 128322, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Ilyas, W. Ahmad, H. Khan, S. Yousaf, M. Yasir, and A. Khan, “Environmental and health impacts of industrial wastewater effluents in Pakistan: a review,” Rev. Environ. Health, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 171–186, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1515/reveh-2018-0078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Gienapp, C. Teplitsky, J. S. Alho, J. A. Mills, and J. Merilä, “Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses,” Mol. Ecol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 167–178, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03413.x. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. L. Archer, J. F. Brodie, and S. A. Rauscher, “Global warming will aggravate ozone pollution in the US Mid-Atlantic,” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1267–1278, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Alavi, A. A. Ewees, S. Ansari, S. Shahid, and Z. M. Yaseen, “A new insight for real-time wastewater quality prediction using hybridized kernel-based extreme learning machines with advanced optimization algorithms,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 20496–20516, 2022. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Arismendy, C. Cárdenas, D. Gómez, A. Maturana, R. Mejía, and C. G. Quintero M, “Intelligent System for the Predictive Analysis of an Industrial Wastewater Treatment Process,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 6348, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12166348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Yurdakul and H. Kazan, “Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 3167, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12083167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. M. Wilson, R. Richard, L. Joseph, and E. Williams, “Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and Vulnerability: An Exploratory Spatial Analysis,” Environ. Justice, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–19, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1089/env.2009.0035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. [K. Lotfi et al., “Predicting wastewater treatment plant quality parameters using a novel hybrid linear-nonlinear methodology,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 240, pp. 463–474, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Arismendy, C. Cárdenas, D. Gómez, A. Maturana, R. Mejía, and C. G. Quintero M, “Intelligent System for the Predictive Analysis of an Industrial Wastewater Treatment Process,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 16, Art. no. 16, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12166348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Xie et al., “Enhancing Real-Time Prediction of Effluent Water Quality of Wastewater Treatment Plant Based on Improved Feedforward Neural Network Coupled with Optimization Algorithm,” Water, vol. 14, no. 7, Art. no. 7, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/w14071053. [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Tchinda et al., “Single-step treatment of primary effluent by Galdieria sulphuraria: Removal of biochemical oxygen demand, nutrients, and pathogens,” Algal Res., vol. 42, p. 101578, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101578. [Google Scholar]
  18. E. M. S. Elfeky, M. R. Shehata, Y. H. Elbashar, M. H. Barakat, and W. M. A. E. Rouby, “Developing the sensing features of copper electrodes as an environmental friendly detection tool for chemical oxygen demand,” RSC Adv., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 4199–4208, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D1RA09411D. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Malik et al., “Drought index prediction using advanced fuzzy logic model: Regional case study over Kumaon in India,” Plos One, vol. 15, no. 5, p. e0233280, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Ćalasan, S. H. E. Abdel Aleem, and A. F. Zobaa, “On the root mean square error (RMSE) calculation for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models: A novel exact analytical solution based on Lambert W function,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 210, p. 112716, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112716. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Chicco, M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman, “The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 7, p. e623, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.