Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 552, 2024
16th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2024)
Article Number 01022
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455201022
Published online 23 July 2024
  1. Fateh Belaid, How does concrete and cement industry transformation contribute to mitigating climate change challenges? RCR Advances. 15, 200084 (2022)DOI: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200084 [Google Scholar]
  2. Hrvoje Miikulcic, Jiri Jaromir Kleme, Milan Vujanovic, Krzysztof Urbaniec, Neven Duic, Reducing greenhouse gasses emissions by fostering the deployment of alternative raw materials and energy sources in the cleaner cement manufacturing process, J. Clean. Prod. 136(B), 119-132 (2016)DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.145 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad L. Almutairi, Bassam A. Tayeh, Adeyemi Adesina, Haytham F. Isleem, Abdullah M. Zeyad, Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review., Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 15, e00733 (2021)DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733 [Google Scholar]
  4. Tengfang Xu, Tjebbe Galama, Jayant Sathaye, Reducing carbon footprint in cement material making: Characterizing costs of conserved energy and reduced carbon emissions., Sustain. Cities Soc. 9, 54-61 (2013)DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2013.03.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Juan Cagiao, Breixo Gómez, Juan Luis Domenesh, Salvador Gutierrez Mainar, Hortensia Gutierrez Lanza, Calculation of the corporate carbon footprint of the cement industry by the application of MC3 methodology, Ecol. Indic. 11(6) 1526–1540 (2011)DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anusha S. Basavaraj, Ravindra Gettu., Primary life cycle inventory data for cement production, with relevance to sustainability assessment-Indian cases., Data Br. 110258 (2024 to be published) D0I:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110258 [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.M. Liew, C. Y Heah, A.B.M. Mustafa, H. Kamarudin, Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: a review, Prog. Mater. Sci. 83, 595-629 (2016) D0I:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Siba Sankar Chanda, Shyamal Guchhait., A comprehensive review on the factors influencing engineering characteristics of lightweight geopolymer concrete., J. Build. Eng. 108887 (2024 to be published) D0I:10.1016/jjobe.2024.108887 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thong M. Pham, Wensu Chen, Abdul M. Khan, Hong Hao, Mohamed Elchalakani, Tung M. Tran., Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberised geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 238, 117705 (2020)DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117705 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yijiang Wang, Tong Zheng, X.F. Zheng, Yifei Liu, Jo Darkwa, Guo-ging Zhou., Thermo-mechanical and moisture absorption properties of fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer concrete reinforced by polypropylene fibers, Constr. Build. Mater. 251, 118960 (2020)DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118960 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ehsan Mohseni, MahyarJafar Kazemi, Mahdi Koushkbaghi, Behnam Zehtab, Babak B Ehforouz, Evaluation of mechanical and durability properties of fiber-reinforced lightweight geopolymer composites based on rice husk ash and nano-alumina, Constr. Build. Mater. 209, 532-540 (2019)DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.067 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Neupane, Fly ash and GGBFS based powder-activated geopolymer binders: a viable sustainable alternative of Portland cement in concrete industry, Mech. Mater. 103, 110122 (2016)DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.09.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Besarion Meskhi, Alexey Beskopylny, Sergei Stel'makh, Evgenii Shcherban., Analytical Review of Geopolymer Concrete: Retrospective and Current Issues, Materials. 16(10), 3792 (2023)DOI: 10.3390/ma16103792 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Amin, I.Y. Hakeem, A.M. Zeyad, B.A. Tayeh, A.M. Maglad, I.S. Agwa., Influence of recycled aggregates and carbon nanofibres on properties of ultra-high-performance concrete under elevated temperatures, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 16, e01063 (2022)DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01063 [Google Scholar]
  15. Shamsad Ahmad, Ahmed Zubair, Mohammed Maslehuddin., Effect of key mixture parameters on flow and mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 99, 73-81 (2015)DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Aliihsan Çelik and Yasin Onuralp Ôzkiliç., Geopolymer concrete with high strength, workability and setting time using recycled steel wires and basalt powder, Steel Compos. Struct., 46(5) (2023)DOI: 10.12989/scs.2023.46.5.689 [Google Scholar]
  17. Subhankar Chowdhury, Subhashree Mohapatra, Ambar Gaur, Gaurav Dwivedi, Archana Soni., Study of various properties of geopolymer concrete-A review, Mater. Today: Proc. 46(12) (2020)DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.835 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ping Duan, Luxia Song, Chunjie Yan., Novel thermal insulating and lightweight composites from metakaolin geopolymer and polystyrene particles, Ceram. Int. 43(6) (2017)DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.025 [Google Scholar]
  19. P.M. Rameshwaran and T.Ch. Madhavi., Flexural behaviour of fly ash based geopolymer concrete, Mater. Today: Proc. 46(9) 3423–3425 (2021)DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.755 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ragini Dutt Sharma and Navdeep Singh., Evaluation of strength and absorption behaviour of iron slag and recycled aggregates concrete and its comparative environmental estimation by life cycle assessment, Clean. Mater. 10, 100210 (2023)DOI: 10.1016/j.clema.2023.100210 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shuvom Dutta and Navdeep Singh., A brief review on workability characteristics of iron slag concrete, Mater. Today: Proc. (2023) to be publishedDOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.042 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nurul Hidayah Roslan, Mohammad Ismail, Zaiton Abdul-Majid, Seyedmojtaba Ghoreishiamiri, Bala Muhammad., Performance of steel slag and steel sludge in concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 104, 16-24 (2016)DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirubajiny Pasupathy, Sayanthan Ramakrishnan, Jay Sanjayan., Influence of recycled concrete aggregate on the foam stability of aerated geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 271, 121850 (2021)DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121850 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Abhishek Kumar and Navdeep Singh, Mechanical performance of steel and iron slag concretes: A brief review, Mater. Today: Proc. 93, Part 3, 62-70 (2023)DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.463 [Google Scholar]
  25. Aliihsan Çelik, Yasin Onuralp Ôzkiliç, Alireza Bahrami, Ibrahim Y. Hakeem., Mechanical performance of geopolymer concrete with micro silica fume and waste steel lathe scrap, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 19, e02548 (2023)DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02548 [Google Scholar]
  26. I.R. Mithanthaya, Shriram Marathe, NBS Rao, Veena Bhat., Influence of superplasticizer on the properties of geopolymer concrete using industrial wastes, Mater. Today: Proc. 4, 9803-9806 (2017)DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.270 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H.M. Tanu and Sujatha Unnikrishnan., Utilization of industrial and agricultural waste materials for the development of geopolymer concrete-A review, Mater. Today: Proc. 65(2) 1290–1297 (2022)DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.192 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shimol Philip and M. Nidhi., A review on the material performance of geopolymer concrete as green building materials, Mater. Today: Proc. 2023 (to be published)DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.110 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.