EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 552 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 552 (2024) 01084 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 552, 2024
16th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2024)
Article Number 01084
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455201084
Published online 23 July 2024
  1. Shankar, P. and Kumar, S., “Solar Distillation-A Parametric Review.” VSRD International Journal of Mechanical, Automobile and Production Engineering, 2012, Vol. 2, pp : 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kannan R., Selvaganesan C., Vignesh M., Babu B.R., Fuentes M., Vivar M., Skryabin I., Srithar K. “Solar still with vapor adsorption basin: Performance analysis.” Renewable Energy, 2014, Vol. 62, pp: 258–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhardwaj R., Ten Kortenaar M.V. and Mudde R.F., “Influence of condensation surface on solar distillation.” Desalination, 2016, 326, pp: 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  4. Xiao G., Xihui W., Mingjiang, Ni, Fei, W., Weijun, Z., Zhongyang, L., Kefa, C. “A review on solar stills for brine desalination.” Applied Energy, 2012, 103, pp: 642–652. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar, P.V., Kumar, A., Prakash, O., Kaviti, A.K. Solar stills system design: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, pp: 153–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Manokar, A.M., Winston, D.P., Kabeel, A., El-Agouz, S., Sathyamurthy, R., Arunkumar, T., Madhu, B., Ahsan, A. Integrated PV/T solar still- A mini-review. Desalination 2018, 435, pp:259–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Abimbola, T.O., Takaijudin, H., Singh, B.S.M., Yusof, K.W., Abdurrasheed, A.S., Al-Qadami, E.H.H., Isah, A.S., Wong, K.X., Nadzri, N.F.A., Ishola, S.A.; et al. Comprehensive passive-mode performance analysis on a new multiple-mode solar still for sustainable clean water processing. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 334, 130214. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharshir, S., Kandeal, A., Ismail, M., Abdelaziz, G., Kabeel, A., Yang, N. Augmentation of a pyramid solar still performance using evacuated tubes and nanofluid: Experimental approach. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 160, 113997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kabeel, A., El-Said, E.M., Abdulaziz, M. Computational fluid dynamic as a tool for solar still performance analysis and design development: A review. Desalination Water Treat. 2019, 159, pp: 200–213 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Sebaey, M.S., Ellman, A., Hegazy, A., Ghonim, T. Experimental analysis and CFD modeling for conventional basin-type solar still. Energies 2020, 13, 5734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rahbar, N., Esfahani, J.A. Estimation of convective heat transfer coefficient in a singleslope solar still: A numerical study. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 50, 387–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Malaiyappan, P., Elumalai, N. Numerical investigations: Basin materials of a single-basin and single-slope solar still. Desalination Water Treat. 2015, 57, 21211–21233. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rahbar, N., Asadi, A., Fotouhi-Bafghi, E. Performance evaluation of two solar stills of different geometries: Tubular versus triangular: Experimental study, numerical simulation, and second law analysis. Desalination 2018, 443, pp: 44–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. AlSaleem, Saleem & Al-Qadami, Ebrahim & Zein, H. & Shafiquzzaman, Md & Haider, Husnain & Ahsan, Amimul & Alresheedi, Mohammad & Alghafis, Abdullah & Alharbi, Abdulaziz. (2022). Computational Fluid Dynamic Applications for Solar Stills Efficiency Assessment: A Review. Sustainability. 14. 10700. 10.3390/su141710700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Panchal, Hitesh N, and Shah, P.K. Modelling and verification of single slope solar still using ANSYS-CFX. Iraq: N. p., 2011. Web. [Google Scholar]
  16. Setoodeh N., Rahimi R. and Ameri, A. “Modeling and determination of heat transfer coefficient in a basin solar still using CFD.” Desalination, 268, 2011, pp: 103–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Subhashini G. and Nigam K.D.P. —CFD modeling of flow profiles and interfacial phenomena in two-phase flow in pipe, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 45, 2006, pp: 55–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosseland Radiation Model Theory. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.