Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 554, 2024
7th International Symposium on Resource Exploration and Environmental Science (REES 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01007 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455401007 | |
| Published online | 30 July 2024 | |
- Gawad E A, Fathy M, Reda M, et al. Petroleum geology: 3D reservoir modelling in the central Gulf of Suez, Egypt, to estimate the hydrocarbon possibility via petrophysical analysis and seismic data interpretation[J]. Geological Journal, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 5329–5342, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Salaun N, Toubiana H, Mitschler J B, et al. Highresolution 3D seismic imaging and refined velocity model building improve the image of a deep geothermal reservoir in the Upper Rhine Graben[J]. The Leading Edge, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 857–863, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bradaric A D, Andersen T, Lecomte I, et al. Recognition and characterization of small-scale sand injectites in seismic data: implications for reservoir development[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, vol. 2022, no. 2, pp. 179, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Wei K, Qin J. Resilience and Economic Loss Assessment of Highway Bridges in Deep Reservoir under Near-Fault Ground Motions[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 04021007, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yi B Y, Yoon Y H, Kim Y J, et al. characterization of thin gas hydrate reservoir in u11eung basin with stepwise seismic inversion[J]. Energies, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 4077, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pang Y, Cai L, He W, et al. Response to discussion of “Seismic assessment of deep water bridges in reservoir considering hydrodynamic effects using endurance time analysis”[J]. Ocean Engineering, vol. 221, no. 5, pp. 108538, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Teillet T, Fournier F, Zhao L, et al. Geophysical pore type inversion in carbonate reservoir: Integration of cores, well logs, and seismic data (Yadana field, offshore Myanmar)[J]. Geophysics, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1–69, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Maleki M, Davolio A, Denis José Schiozer. Quantitative integration of 3D and 4D seismic impedance into reservoir simulation model updating in the Norne Field[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 167–187, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Karbalaali H, Javaheriani A, Dahlke S, et al. Seismic channel edge detection using 3D Shearlets‐ a study on synthetic and real channelized 3D seismic data[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1272–1289, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nantanoi S, Rodriguez-Pradilla G, Verdon J. 3D seismic interpretation and fault slip potential analysis from hydraulic fracturing in the Bowland Shale, UK[J]. Petroleum Geoscience, vol. 2022, no. 2, pp. 28, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Protasov M I, Gadylshin K G, Tcheverda V A, et al. 3D diffraction imaging of fault and fracture zones via image spectral decomposition of partial images[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1256–1270, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Santos A B, Porsani M J, Góis, Manuelle S. 3D Seismic survey design using mixed-radix based algorithm inversion[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 1720–1731, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Naibai M A, Shenglin J, Ruizhao Y, et al. Seismic response characteristics and identification of faultkarst reservoir in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 398–403, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.