Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455601057]


Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 556, 2024
International Conference on Recent Advances in Waste Minimization & Utilization-2024 (RAWMU-2024)
Article Number 01046
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455601046
Published online 09 August 2024
  1. Al-Jarf, R. (2023). Digital Reading among Children in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 5 (3), 35-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Obaydi, L.H., & Iddagoda, A. (2022). Dyslexic Students' Motivation, Habits and Attitudes towards Digitalbased Reading: A Case Study of EFL College Students Journal of Asia TEFL, 19 (1), 327. [Google Scholar]
  3. Birkerts, S. (2006). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar]
  4. Foasberg, N.M. (2011). Adoption of e-book readers among college students: A survey. Information technology and libraries, 30(3). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guernsey, L. (2000, March 2). Bookbag of the future. The New York Times Online. Retrieved January 7, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hakemulder, F., & Mangen, A. (2024). Literary Reading on Paper and Screens: Associations Between Reading Habits and Preferences and Experiencing Meaningfulness Reading Research Quarterly. [Google Scholar]
  7. Healy, J.M. (1999). Endangered minds: Why children don't think--and what we can do about it. Turtleback Books. [Google Scholar]
  8. Internet users in India to reach 627 million in 2019: Report. (2019, March 6). The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/internet-users-in-india-to-reach-627-million-in-2019-report/ articleshow/68288868.cms?from=m. [Google Scholar]
  9. Landow, G.P. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lanham, R.A. (1993). The electronic word: technology, democracy, and the arts. Chicago: University of Chicago. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing & Management, 42(2), 583-592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murray, J.H. (2016). Hamlet on the Holodeck. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar]
  13. Morris, M. (1997). A question of cultural studies. Back to reality, 36-57. [Google Scholar]
  14. Number of mobile phone users in India from 2013 to 2019, Statista.com, Available at url: https://www.statista.com/statistics/274658/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-in-india/, Viewed on 26/11/201. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ogunbodede, K.F., & Sawyerr-George, O.E. (2023). Digital resources and the reading habits of university students in Nigeria International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(1). [Google Scholar]
  16. Oh, C.M., Krish, P., & Hamat, A. (2022). Reading on Smartphones: Students’ Habits and Implications for Reading Skills Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23 (1), 259-277. [Google Scholar]
  17. Oktavianto, P. (2022). The Correlation Between Digital Reading Habit, and Reading Comprehension. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pardede, P., Rafli, Z., & Iskandar, I. (2023). Indonesian EFL Learners’ Digital Reading Habits Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7 (3), 459-479. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vasan, M., & Yoganandan, G. (2023). Reading habits of students of higher learning institutions during COVID-19 lockdown period International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 28 (3), 352-367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ross, C.S. (2002). Reading in a digital age. na. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ross, J.C., Lazard, A.J., King, J.L., Noar, S.M., Reboussin, B.A., Jenson, D., & Sutfin, E.L. (2023). Responses to pictorial versus text-only cigarillo warnings among a nationally representative sample of US young adults Tobacco Control, 32 (2), 211-217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spjeldnæs, K., & Karlsen, F. (2022). How digital devices transform literary reading: The impact of e-books, audiobooks and online life on reading habits new media & society, 14614448221126168. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tabullo, Á.J., Chiófalo, M.F., & Wainselboim, A.J. (2024). Reading comprehension in undergraduates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Associations with executive function difficulties, reading habits and screen times Reading Psychology, 45 (1), 1-30. [Google Scholar]
  24. Virgiyanti, D.F., Fachriza, A., Nuraini, E.I., Dipta, D., & Hafiz, L.A. (2024). Online and Offline Reading Materials from Students’ Perspective SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5 (1), 29-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Williams, P.E. (2003). Will a digital textbook replace me. THE Journal, 30(10), 25-26. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ngwoke, F., Agbo, I., & Ogenyi, L. (2023). Effects of addiction to the use of social media on the reading habits of students of English language studies, university of Nigeria, Nsukka Interactive Learning Environments, 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sridhar, M.S. (2021). Reading habit in the internet era. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 58 (6), 371376. [Google Scholar]
  28. Karakoç Öztürk, B. (2021). Digital reading and the concept of ebook: Metaphorical analysis of preservice teachers’ perceptions regarding the concept of ebook. Sage Open, 11 (2), 21582440211016841. [Google Scholar]
  29. Morris, J. (2016). Contexts of digital reading: How genres affect reading practices (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati). [Google Scholar]
  30. Miranda, A.E., Hermansyah, H., & Mortini, A.V. (2023). READING HABITS IN THE DIGITAL AGE: CHANGES TREND AND BEHAVIOR IN ALPHA GENERATION Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6 (1), 100-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.