EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 559 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 559 (2024) 04047 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 559, 2024
2024 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2024)
Article Number 04047
Number of page(s) 10
Section Structural Engineering & Concrete Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455904047
Published online 08 August 2024
  1. R. H. Matsuoka and R. Kaplan, “People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of Landscape And Urban Planning contributions,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 7–19, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Barbosa et al., “Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 83, no. 2–3, pp. 187–195, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Kemperman and H. Timmermans, “Landscape and Urban Planning Green spaces in the direct living environment and social contacts of the aging population,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 129, pp. 44–54, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.05.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Maas, R. a Verheij, P. P. Groenewegen, S. de Vries, and P. Spreeuwenberg, “Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?,” J Epidemiol Community Health (1978), vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 587–592, 2006, doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Giles-Corti et al., “Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?,” Am J Prev Med, vol. 28, no. 2 SUPPL. 2, pp. 169–176, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. R. Mccormack, M. Rock, A. M. Toohey, and D. Hignell, “Health & Place Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research,” Health Place, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 712–726, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. C. Dony, E. M. Delmelle, and E. C. Delmelle, “Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities: A Variable-width Floating Catchment Area (VFCA) method,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 143, pp. 90–99, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. C. Dony, E. M. Delmelle, and E. C. Delmelle, “Landscape and Urban Planning Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities : A Variable-width Floating Catchment Area ( VFCA ) method,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 143, pp. 90–99, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Wang, J. C. Thill, and R. K. Meentemeyer, “Estimating the demand for public open space: Evidence from North Carolina municipalities,” Papers in Regional Science, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 219–232, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00372.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. EoL: MoHUA, “Ease of Living Index Assesment Framework,” 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Žlender and C. Ward Thompson, “Accessibility and use of peri-urban green space for inner-city dwellers: A comparative study,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 165, pp. 193–205, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. M. Neil Stuart, Robert L. Hodgart, Mohd Johari Mohd Yusof, “RICS Research,” 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Kuchelmeister, “by The Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study is being undertaken under the auspices of the Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission.,” 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Centre for Urban Green Spaces, “Congress on Urban Green Spaces: Abstracts,” Green Cities: Green Minds, no. march, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Town and Country Planning Organisation, “Urban and regional development plans formulation and implementation (URDPFI) guidelines,” 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ministry of Urban Development India, “Urban Greening Guidelines,” 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. MMR-EIS, “Inventorisation of Open Spaces and Water Bodies in Greater Mumbai,” 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Xu, “Modification of Normalized Difference Water Index ( NDWI ) to Enhance Open Water Features in Remotely Sensed Imagery,” no. July 2006, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01431160600589179. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Szabó, Z. Gácsi, and B. Balázs, “SPECIFIC FEATURES OF NDVI, NDWI AND MNDWI AS REFLECTED IN LAND COVER CATEGORIES,” 2016, doi: 10.21120/LE/10/3-4/13. [Google Scholar]
  20. D. A. Artis and W. H. Carnahan, “Survey of emissivity variability in thermography of urban areas,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 12, pp. 313–329, 1982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. de la Barrera, P. Rubio, and E. Banzhaf, “The value of vegetation cover for ecosystem services in the suburban context,” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, vol. 16, pp. 110–122, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. UNCTAD, “Creative Economy Report 2010,” 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gensler and Urban Land Institute, “Open Space: an asset without a champion?,” 2011. [Google Scholar]
  24. C. C. Konijnendijk, M. Annerstedt, A. B. Nielsen, and S. Maruthaveeran, “Benefits of Urban Parks - A systematic review,” Copenhagen and Alnarp, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. E. Pataki et al., “Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 27–36, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1890/090220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Nigel, S. Carys, and W. Helen, “Improving Urban Parks, Play Areas and Green Spaces,” 2002. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Joachim and M. Fessel, Cities for Smart Environmental and Energy Futures. 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37661-0. [Google Scholar]
  28. C. Bohner, “Decision-support systems for sustainable urban planning,” International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, vol. 6, no. 1–2, pp. 193–205, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1504/IJETM.2006.008261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Martinelli, A. Battisti, and A. Matzarakis, “Multicriteria analysis model for urban open space renovation: An application for Rome,” Sustainable Cities and Society, pp. 1–11, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2014.07.002. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.