Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 559, 2024
2024 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2024)
Article Number 04053
Number of page(s) 21
Section Structural Engineering & Concrete Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455904053
Published online 08 August 2024
  1. Conference of Parties (COP) 26, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Glasgow, 2021. https://unfccc.int/process/bodies/supreme-bodies/conference-of-the-parties-cop; accessed on 22 Sept 2023 [Google Scholar]
  2. Hydropower status report 2022, International Hydropower Association, One Canada Square, London, E14 5AA, United Kingdom. https://www.hydropower.org/publications/2022-hydropower-status-report, https://assets-global.website-files.com/5f749e4b9399c80b5e421384/63a1d6be6c0c9d38e6ab0594_IHA202212-status-report-02.pdf ; accessed on 22 Sept 2023 [Google Scholar]
  3. Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE), an office of U.S. Dept. of energy, website: https://www.energy.gov/eere/water/hydropower-basics; accessed on 22 Sept 2023 [Google Scholar]
  4. Report of COP27, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Sharm el-Sheikh 6-20 November 2022, FCCC/CP/2022/10/Add.1 dated 17 March 2023 website: https://unfccc.int/cop27/decisions; accessed on 22 Sept.2023 [Google Scholar]
  5. Design of Arch dams, Design manual for concrete arch dams, Bureau of Reclamation, United States Dept.of the interior, Denver, Colarado, 1977 [Google Scholar]
  6. ICOLD-CIGB, International Commission on large dams, constitution statutes, July 2011. https://www.icold-cigb.org/userfiles/files/CIGB/INSTITUTIONAL_FILES/Constitution2011.pdf [Google Scholar]
  7. ICOLD-CIGB, International Commission on large dams, https://www.icold-cigb.org/GB/world_register/general_synthesis.asp [Google Scholar]
  8. S.-Y Wu, W. Cao, J. Zheng, Analysis of working behavior of Jinping-I Arch Dam during initial impoundment, Water Science and Engineering, Volume 9, Issue 3, 2016, pp 240-248, ISSN 1674-2370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2016.11.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Final report World Commission on Dams Case Study, Kariba Dam Zambia and Zimbabwe, Secretariat of the World Commission on Dams, Cape Town 8018, South Africa, November 2000. [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Duffaut, The traps behind the failure of Malpasset arch dam, France, in 1959, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Volume 5, Issue 5,2013, Pages 335-341, ISSN 1674-7755, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.07.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Barla, Q. Fan. & L. Peng, Introduction to the Special Issue “Super High Arch Dams and Underground Caverns in China”. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51, 2447–2450 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1551-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. CHINCOLD website: http://www.chincold.org.cn/dams/DamInformation/damsinchina/webinfo/2010/07/127 9253973976034.htm [Google Scholar]
  13. FEMA-P-93, Federal guidelines for dam safety, Federal emergency management agency, U. S. Department of homeland security, April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. The dam safety act, 2021, The legislative dept., Ministry of Law and Justice, Govt.of India, New Delhi. CG-DL-E-14122021-231858, 14 December 2021 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bulletin 72 Revised, ICOLD, Selecting seismic parameters for large dams. Guidelines, Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, International Commission on large Dams, Paris, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  16. Report, NPDP-01 V1, Dam failures in the U.S., National Performance of Dams Program, Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, September 2018 [Google Scholar]
  17. FEMA –P65 Federal guidelines for dam safety, Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams, Federal Emergency Management Agency, U. S. Department of homeland security, May 2005 [Google Scholar]
  18. USACE, Arch Dam Design, US Army Corps of Engineers EM 1110-2-2201, 31 May 1994 [Google Scholar]
  19. FERC, Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, Chapter 11, Arch Dams, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, October 1999 [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Ghanaat, Failure modes approach to safety evaluation of dams, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 1115 [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Wang, Key Technologies in the Design and Construction of 300 m Ultra-High Arch Dams, Engineering 2 (2016) 350–359 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Engineering Monograph No. 19, Design Criteria for Concrete Arch and Gravity Dams, Design and Construction Engineering and Research Center, Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior. Denver, Colorado 80225 [Google Scholar]
  23. A.K. Dhawan, V.V. Arora, A. Paul, ManojKumar, B.R.K. Pillai, Assessment of current material properties of aged concrete arch dam-a case study, Second National Dam Safety Conference, Bengaluru - January,2016 [Google Scholar]
  24. S.-H. Chen, Hydraulic Structures, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47331-3, Springer, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Payne, Shaking Table Study to Investigate Failure Modes of Arch Dams, DSO-02-01, Bureau of Reclamation, U. S. Department of Interior, Denver, Colorado, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Report No. DSO-02-02, Investigation of the Failure Modes of Concrete Dams - Physical Model Tests, Dam Safety Office, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, May 2002 https://www.usbr.gov/damsafety/TechDev/DSOTechDev/DSO-02-02.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Niwa, and R.W. Clough. Shaking Table Research On Concrete Dam Models. Report No. UCB/EERC 80-05, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, (1980). [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Niwa, and R.W. Clough. Non-Linear Seismic Response of Arch Dams. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 10, 267-281, 1982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Fan, J. Chen, and J. Wang, Investigations into seismic failure of high arch dam based on shaking table experiments and numerical simulation, 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Zhou, X. Feng & T. Zhu, Investigation of Seismic Failure for High Arch Dam with model test on shaking table, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon 2012 [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Zhou, G. Lin, T. Zhu, A. D. Jefferson, and F. W. Williams, Experimental Investigations into Seismic Failure of High Arch Dams, Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(8),926-935 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(926) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Wieland, Models of Earthquake Ground Shaking Used in Seismic Design and Safety Checks of Large Dams, International Journal of Civil Engineering, Springer online, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0339-3, 2018 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Wieland, Seismic Design and Performance Criteria for Large Storage Dams, Proc. 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Eng., Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 Sep. 2012(2012) [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Wieland, Seismic design and performance criteria for large dams and methods of dynamic analysis, International Dam Safety Conference – 2019, 13-14 February 2019, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India(2019) [Google Scholar]
  35. ICOLD, Selecting Seismic Parameters for Large Dams, Guidelines, Bulletin 148, Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design. International Commission on Large Dams, Paris (2016). [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Qiu, D. Zheng, P. Xu, Q. Cao, Z. Chen, B. Xu. Online structural damage state identification of concrete arch dams under dynamic loads using a recursive TVARX approach. Structural Health Monitoring. 2022;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221119709 [Google Scholar]
  37. A. K. Chopra, Earthquake Analysis of Arch Dams: Factors to Be Considered, Journal of structural engineering, 2012, 138(2): pp 205-214 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. K. Chopra, Nonlinear Response History Analysis of Dams, Earthquake Engineering for Concrete Dams: Analysis, Design, and Evaluation, First Edn., John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  39. J. J. Bommer & A. B. Acevedo, The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis, Journal of Earthquake Engineering,8:S1,43-91, DOI: 10.1080/13632460409350521 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  40. Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior, U.S., History Essays from the Centennial Symposium - Part 1: Dam Histories, Concrete Dam Evolution, Embankment Dam Design, Hoover Dam, Fish Passages, Hydropower, Boulder Dam . Progressive Management. Kindle Edition [Google Scholar]
  41. Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior, U.S., Comparison of Analytical and Structural Behaviour results for Flaming Gorge, Research report No.14, 1968 [Google Scholar]
  42. H. Mirzabozorg, M. A. Hariri-Ardebili, M. Shirkhan,and S.M. Seyed-Kolbadi, Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Analysis of Thermal Distribution in Arch Dams considering Solar Radiation Effect, The Scientific World Journal, Volume 2014, Article ID 597393, 15 pages, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/597393 [Google Scholar]
  43. K.J. Panicker, P. Nagarajan, S.G. Thampi, Critical Review on Stress-Sensitivity and Other Behavioural Aspects of Arch Dams, Advances in Civil Engineering, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 83, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5644-9_42 pp551-566 [Google Scholar]
  44. Doc. No. CDSO_GUD_DS_02_v1.0, Guidelines for Instrumentation of Large Dams, Central Water Commission (CWC), Govt. of India, New Delhi, January 2018. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  45. FEMA P-1025, Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety Risk Assessment, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, United States, January 2015 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.