EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 561 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 561 (2024) 01017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 561, 2024
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Materials Science (EEMS 2024)
Article Number 01017
Number of page(s) 11
Section Energy System Simulation and Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456101017
Published online 09 August 2024
  1. T. Beltramo, G. Blalock, S. Harrell, D. I. Levine, and A. M. Simons, “The Effects of Fuel-Efficient Cookstoves on Fuel Use, Particulate Matter, and Cooking Practices: Results from a Randomized Trial in Rural Uganda,” Energy J., 44, 6, pp. 43–70,(2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Gizachew and M. Tolera, “Adoption and kitchen performance test of improved cook stove in the Bale Eco-Region of Ethiopia,” Energy Sustain. Dev., 45, pp. 186–189, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Jan et al., “Adoption of improved cookstoves in Pakistan: A logit analysis,” Biomass and Bioenergy,103, pp. 55–62, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Clements et al., “Unlocking electric cooking on Nepali micro-hydropower mini-grids,” Energy Sustain. Dev., 57, pp. 119–131, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Baumgartner, R. E. Arku, and K. L. Dickinson, “Household Energy Solutions in Low and Middle Income Countries,” in Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, Elsevier, pp. 494–509 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Kumar and L. Igdalsky, “Sustained uptake of clean cooking practices in poor communities: Role of social networks,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 48, pp. 189–193, ( 2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Hoffmann, G. Uckert, C. Reif, K. Müller, and S. Sieber, “Traditional biomass energy consumption and the potential introduction of firewood efficient stoves: insights from western Tanzania,” Reg. Environ. Chang., 15, 7, pp. 1191–1201, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. N. Mangeni et al., “Household cooking fuel choice and associated factors in a rural and peri-urban community in Western Kenya,” Energy Environ., (2023). [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Brown, J. Leary, G. Davies, S. Batchelor, and N. Scott, “eCook: What behavioural challenges await this potentially transformative concept?,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, 22, pp. 106–115. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Rocca-Poliméni, D. Flick, and J. Vasseur, “A model of heat and mass transfer inside a pressure cooker,” J. Food Eng., 107, 3-4, pp. 393–404, (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Gorjian, E. Rahmati, S. Gorjian, A. Anand, and L. D. Jathar, “A comprehensive study of research and development in concentrating solar cookers (CSCs): Design considerations, recent advancements, and economics,” Sol. Energy, 245 pp. 80–107, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Rubinstein et al., “Adoption of electricity for clean cooking in Cameroon: A mixed-methods field evaluation of current cooking practices and scale-up potential,” Energy Sustain. Dev. 71, pp. 118–131, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Gill-Wiehl, S. Sievers, and D. M. Kammen, “The value of community technology workers for LPG use: A pilot in Shirati, Tanzania,” Energy. Sustain. Soc. 12, 1 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Manaye, S. Amaha, Y. Gufi, B. Tesfamariam, A. Worku, and H. Abrha, “Fuelwood use and carbon emission reduction of improved biomass cookstoves: evidence from kitchen performance tests in Tigray, Ethiopia,” Energy. Sustain. Soc. 12, 1, p. 28, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Kaputo, M. Mwanza, and S. Talai, “A Review of Improved Cooker Stove Utilization Levels, Challenges and Benefits in Sub-Saharan Africa,” J. Energy Res. Rev., 14, 1, pp. 9–25, (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Bhattacharyya and D. Das, “What Makes Rural Households Use Traditional Fuel? Empirical Evidence from India,” SSRN Electron. J., (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. E. J.. Mitchell et al., “Pollutant Emissions from Improved Cookstoves of the Type Used in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Combust. Sci. Technol. 192, 8, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Negash, A. Abegaz, and J. U. Smith, “Environmental and financial benefits of improved cookstove technologies in the central highlands of Ethiopia,” Biomass and Bioenergy. 150, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  19. H. H. Osiolo, “Cook stove technology adoption: Evidence from Kenya,” Energy Sustain. Dev., 63 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Mazzone, T. Cruz, and P. Bezerra, “Firewood in the forest: Social practices, culture, and energy transitions in a remote village of the Brazilian Amazon,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 74 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Guta et al., “A systematic review of household energy transition in low and middle income countries,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 86, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  22. L. G. Hooper et al., “Traditional cooking practices and preferences for stove features among women in rural Senegal: Informing improved cookstove design and interventions,” PLoS One, 13, 11 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  23. REN21, “Renewable in Cities and Suburbs,” 2020. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. G. Ahamad, F. Tanin, and N. Shrestha, “Household Smoke-Exposure Risks Associated with Cooking Fuels and Cooking Places in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey Data,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, 5 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  25. C. N. Daniel M. Nzengya, Paul Maina Mwari, “Barriers to the Adoption of Improved Cooking Stoves for Rural Resilience and Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Kenya,” in African Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  26. IEA, “Renewables 2020:Analysis and forecast to 2025,” (2020). [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Koala et al., “Impact of Improved Cookstoves on the Level of Household Exposure to CO and PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Sub-Saharan Cities: The Case of the City of Ouagadougou,” Open J. Air Pollut., 12, 02 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Bluffstone, A. D. Beyene, Z. Gebreegziabher, P. Martinsson, A. Mekonnen, and M. Toman, “Experience and Learning with Improved Technologies: Evidence from Improved Biomass Cookstoves in Ethiopia,” Environ. Resour. Econ., 81, no. 2 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  29. M. B. B. Waganesh Admase Wagaye, “Experimental investigation of thermal efficiency enhancement of improved biomass cookstoves,” (2022). [Google Scholar]
  30. FAO, “Global forest resources assessment 2020,” (2020). [Google Scholar]
  31. World Health Organization., “Burning opportunity: clean household energy for health, sustainable development, and wellbeing of women and children.,” (2016). [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Kulkarni, P. Mehta, A. Vartak, D. Ghose, and M. S. Reddy, “Reduction in Firewood Consumption due to Implementation of Improved Cookstoves in Melghat Tiger Reserve, India,” Asia. Pac. J. Rural Dev., 32, 1, pp. 26–36, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Shammi, J. Winter, M. M. Islam, B. Akter, and N. Hasan, “Cookstoves for biochar production and carbon capture,” in Green Sustainable Process for Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Science,, pp. 53–68 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Goldemberg, J. Martinez-Gomez, A. Sagar, and K.R. Smith, “Household air pollution, health, and climate change: cleaning the air,” Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 3(2018). [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Belachew and Y. Melka, “Preferences and adoption of improved cookstove from results-based financing program in Southeastern Ethiopia,” Front. Energy Res., 11,(2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. N. S. Rathore, C. K. Singh, N. Rathore, and N. L. Panwar, “Thermal performance and heat storage behaviour of three pots improved cookstove,” Energy Nexus, 6 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  37. C. K. P. Pavithiran, D. Sakthivadivel, G. P. Kumar, B. John, V. M. Jaganathan, and S. Iniyan, “Energy analysis and carbon dioxide mitigation potential of biomass-driven combined power, cooling, and cooking systems for rural applications,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  38. C. E. Matavel et al., “Toward energy saving and food safety in Central Mozambique: the role of improved cook stoves and heat retention boxes,” Energy. Sustain. Soc., 12, 1(2022) [Google Scholar]
  39. D. D. Furszyfer Del Rio, F. Lambe, J. Roe, N. Matin, K.E. Makuch, and M. Osborne, “Do we need better behaved cooks? Reviewing behavioural change strategies for improving the sustainability and effectiveness of cookstove programs,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 70 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  40. S. Lindgren, “Cookstove implementation and Education for Sustainable Development: A review of the field and proposed research agenda,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 146 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  41. M. M. Adane, G. D. Alene, S. T. Mereta, and K. L. Wanyonyi, “Facilitators and barriers to improved cookstove adoption: a community-based crosssectional study in Northwest Ethiopia,” Environ. Health Prev. Med., 25, 1(2020) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. C. Jana and S. C. Bhattacharya, “Sustainable cooking energy options for rural poor people in India: an empirical study,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., 19, 3 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  43. Z. C. Win et al., “Differences in consumption rates and patterns between firewood and charcoal: A case study in a rural area of Yedashe Township, Myanmar,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 109, pp. 39–46, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. D. K. Das, M. S. Islam, C. B. Dutta, M. M. Hassan, and S. S. Hossen, “Is there any demand for improved cooking stoves? Evidence from Bangladesh,” J. Environ. Manage., 298 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  45. G. R. Malla, Sunil and Timilsina, “Household Cooking Fuel Choice and Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Developing Countries: A Review,” World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap. No. 6903, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  46. T. K. Baul, M. Das, S. Kar, and M. Jashimuddin, “Household-level cooking stove emissions, perceptions and influencing factors: Lessons learned from Rangunia Upazila, Chittagong, Bangladesh,” Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain., 4 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  47. A. V. Shankar et al., “Everybody stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions,” Energy Policy, 141 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  48. F. Mamuye Bayu, “Cost reduction and forest preservation potential of advanced stoves and challenges of their adoption in higher education: the case of werabe university, Ethiopia,” Heliyon, 6, 8 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  49. E. Phillip et al., “Improved cookstoves to reduce household air pollution exposure in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of intervention studies,” PLoS One, 18, 4 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  50. K. Cundale, R. Thomas, J. K. Malava, D. Havens, K. Mortimer, and L. Conteh, “A health intervention or a kitchen appliance? Household costs and benefits of a cleaner burning biomass-fuelled cookstove in Malawi,” Soc. Sci. Med., 183, pp. 1–10, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. E. A. Boudewijns et al., “Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of improved solid fuel cookstoves and clean fuels in low-income and middle-income countries: an umbrella review,” Lancet Planet. Heal. 6, 7 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  52. P. Kumar and S. Mehta, “Poverty, gender, and empowerment in sustained adoption of cleaner cooking systems: Making the case for refined measurement,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 19, pp. 48–52 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Jemberu Dagnaw, F. Shemsu Kedir, and M. Gopal, “Investigation of different clay compositions and additives for energy-efficient and impact-resistant Injera baking pan,” Mater. Today Proc., (2023). [Google Scholar]
  54. Q. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Yan, and T. Peng, “How to promote rural household energy transition in energy poverty area? Evidence from the Pumqu River Basin, Tibetan Plateau,” Energy Reports 9 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  55. A. Pallegedara, K. A. Mottaleb, and D. B. Rahut, “Exploring choice and expenditure on energy for domestic works by the Sri Lankan households: Implications for policy,” Energy, 222 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  56. S. P. Astuti, R. Day, and S. B. Emery, “A successful fuel transition? Regulatory instruments, markets, and social acceptance in the adoption of modern LPG cooking devices in Indonesia,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 58 (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.