Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 561, 2024
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Materials Science (EEMS 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02019 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Intelligent Environment Planning and Green Development | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456102019 | |
| Published online | 09 August 2024 | |
- Chen, S., Bu, M., Wu, S., & Liang, X. (2015). How does TMT attention to innovation of Chinese firms influence firm innovation activities? A study on the moderating role of corporate governance. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1127–1135. [Google Scholar]
- Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 18(S1), 187–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wofford, J. C. (1994). An examination of the cognitive processes used to handle employee job problems. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 180–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- He, S., Huang, X., & Chen, Q. (2016). Does manager’s environmental cognition improve firms performance? The mediating role of proactive environmental strategy and the moderating role of business environmental uncertainty. Nankai Business Review, 19(6), 49–57 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J., & Hua, X. (2021). Top management team attention and firm green innovation strategy: Empirical evidence from listed Chinese manufacturing companies. First Sci. Sci. Manag. S. and Trans, 42, 122–142 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Cao, H., & Chen, Z. (2019). The driving effect of internal and external environment on green innovation strategy-The moderating role of top management’s environmental awareness. Nankai Business Review International, 10(3), 342–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Peng, X. R., & Wei, J. (2015). Stakeholders’ environmental orientation and eco-innovation: The moderating role of top managers’ environmental awareness. Studies in Science of Science, 33(7), 1109–1120 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”?. Journal of accounting research, 41(1), 47–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Liang, S. K. (2015). Managers’ overconfidence, debt constraints and cost stickiness. Nankai Business Review, 18(3), 122–131 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Xie, H., & Hui, L. (2014). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the cost stickiness: evidence from chinese manufacturing listed firms. Management Review (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Bi, X. F., Zhang J. M., & Li, H.Y. (2015). How Financial Background Richness of CEO Influence Cost Stickiness. Accounting Research, (03):57–63+95 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Luo, H., Huang, W., & Wang, Z. (2023). How Financial Background Richness of CEO Influence Cost Stickiness. Accounting Research, (02):149–162 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Fang, S., & Liang, Y. (2018). Cost management research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 187–209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y. H., & Zhan, L. (2011). Corporate life-cycle, corporate governance and corporate capital allocation efficiency. Nankai Business Review, 14(03):110–121 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.