EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 564 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 564 (2024) 05007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 564, 2024
International Conference on Power Generation and Renewable Energy Sources (ICPGRES-2024)
Article Number 05007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Solar Power Generation Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456405007
Published online 06 September 2024
  1. F. Liu, S. Duan, F. Liu, B. Liu, and Y. Kang, ‘‘A variable step size INC MPPT method for PV systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2622–2628, Jul. 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Q. Mei, M. Shan, L. Liu, and J. M. Guerrero, ‘‘A novel improved variable step-size incremental-resistance MPPT method for PV systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 2427–2434, Jun. 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F.-S. Pai and R.-M. Chao, ‘‘A new algorithm to photovoltaic power point tracking problems with quadratic maximization,’’ IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 262–264, Mar. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. A. Elgendy, B. Zahawi, and D. J. Atkinson, ‘‘Assessment of perturb and observe MPPT algorithm implementation techniques for PV pumping applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–33, Jan. 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Mamarelis, G. Petrone, and G. Spagnuolo, ‘‘A two-steps algorithm improving the P&O steady state MPPT efficiency,’’ Appl. Energy, vol. 113, pp. 414–421, Jan. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. L. Lian, J. H. Jhang, and I. S. Tian, ‘‘A maximum power point tracking method based on perturb-and-observe combined with particle swarm optimization,’’ IEEE J. Photovolt., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 626–633, Mar. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Killi and S. Samanta, ‘‘Modified perturb and observe MPPT algorithm for drift avoidance in photovoltaic systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 5549–5559, Sep. 2015. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2407854. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. V. R. Kota and M. N. Bhukya, ‘‘A simple and efficient MPPT scheme for PV module using 2-dimensional lookup table,’’ in Proc. IEEE Power Energy Conf. Illinois (PECI), Feb. 2016, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/PECI.2016.7459226. [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Zhang, K. Sun, Y. Xing, and J. Zhao, ‘‘A family of five-level dual buck full-bridge inverters for grid-tied applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 7029–7042, Oct. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Salem, E. M. Ahmed, M. Orabi, and M. Ahmed, ‘‘New three-phase symmetrical multilevel voltage source inverter,’’ IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 430–442, Sep. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Rodriguez, L. Moran, J. Pontt, P. Correa, and C. Silva, ‘‘A high-performance vector control of an 11-level inverter,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 80–85, Feb. 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Graditi, G. Adinolfi, and G. M. Tina, ‘‘Photovoltaic optimizer boost converters: Temperature influence and electro-thermal design,’’ Appl. Energy, vol. 115, pp. 140–150, Feb. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. R. Airineni and S. Keerthipati, ‘‘DC offset minimization of three-phase multilevel inverter configuration under fault and DC link voltage unbalance conditions,’’ IET Power Electron., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 293–301, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L. He and C. Cheng, ‘‘A bridge modular switched-capacitor-based multilevel inverter with optimized spwmcontrol method and enhanced power-decoupling ability,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 6140–6149, Aug. 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. K. Das, K. C. Jana, and A. Sinha, ‘‘Performance evaluation of an asymmetrical reduced switched multi-level inverter for a grid-connected PV system,’’ IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 252–263, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. N. Kumle, S. H. Fathi, F. Jabbarvaziri, M. Jamshidi, and S. S. H. Yazdi, ‘‘Application of memetic algorithm for selective harmonic elimination in multi-level inverters,’’ IET Power Electron., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1733–1739, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Agrawal and S. Jain, ‘‘Multilevel inverter for interfacing renewable energy sources with low/medium- and high-voltage grids,’’ IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 1822–1831, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Gaikwad and P. A. Arbune, ‘‘Study of cascaded H-Bridge multilevel inverter,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Autom. Control Dyn. Optim. Techn. (ICACDOT), 2016, pp. 179–182. [Google Scholar]
  19. C. K. Lee, S. Y. R. Hui, and H. S.-H. Chung, ‘‘A 31-level cascade inverter for power applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 613–617, Jan. 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Adinolfi, G. Graditi, P. Siano, and A. Piccolo, ‘‘Multiobjective optimal design of photovoltaic synchronous boost converters assessing efficiency, reliability, and cost savings,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1038–1048, Oct. 2015. doi: 10.1109/TII.2015.2462805. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.