EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 565 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 565 (2024) 02016 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 565, 2024
2024 5th International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS2024)
Article Number 02016
Number of page(s) 8
Section Cultural Tourism Management and Business Innovation Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456502016
Published online 09 September 2024
  1. Sinha, J., & Lu, F. C. (2019) Ignored or rejected: Retail exclusion effects on construal levels and consumer responses to compensation. J. Consum. Res., 46(4): 791–807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rawat, G., Dewani, P. P., & Kulashri, A. (2022) Social exclusion and consumer responses: A comprehensive review and theoretical framework. Int. J. Consum. Stud., 46(5): 1537–1563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009) Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: being rejected versus being ignored. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 96(2): 415–431. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, R. P., Wan, E. W., & Levy, E. (2017) The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands. J. Consum. Psychol., 27(1): 23–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, C., Yang, P., & Li, Z. (2024) Asking alternative identity for help: how and why the multiple-identity perspective impacts compensatory consumption behavior. Curr. Psychol., 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharma, M., & Rahman, Z. (2022) Anthropomorphic brand management: An integrated review and research agenda. J. Bus. Res., 149: 463–475. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Williams, K. D. (2009) Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 41: 275–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev., 114(4): 864–886. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012) Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. J. Consum. Res., 39(3): 530–544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, F., Wei, H., Zhu, Z., & Chen, H. A. (2022) Warmth or competence: Brand anthropomorphism, social exclusion, and advertisement effectiveness. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 67: 103025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan, E., & Gohary, A. (2023) To whom does destination anthropomorphism appeal? Power and perceived control. J. Travel. Res., 62(4): 859–877. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012) When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. J. Consum. Res., 39(2): 307–323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, H. C., & Kramer, T. (2015) Do materialists prefer the “brand-as-servant”? The interactive effect of anthropomorphized brand roles and materialism on consumer responses. J. Consum. Res., 42(2): 284–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Van Esch, P., Cui, Y. G., Sledge, A., Das, G., & Pala, E. (2023) Preference for partner or servant brand roles depends on consumers’ power distance belief. J. Bus. Res., 162: 113896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, S. A., & Oh, H. (2021) Anthropomorphism and its implications for advertising hotel brands. J. Bus. Res., 129: 455–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, B., Wang, L., & Li, X. (2020) To collaborate or serve? Effects of anthropomorphized brand roles and implicit theories on consumer responses. Cornell. Hosp. Q., 61(1): 53–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schroll, R. (2023) “Ouch!” When and why food anthropomorphism negatively affects consumption. J. Consum. Psychol., 33(3): 561–574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011) Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. J. Consum. Res., 37(5): 902–919. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Xu, W., & Jin, X. T. (2020) Effects of social exclusion and implicit theories of personality on nostalgic consumption. Soc. Behav. Pers., 48(3): 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  20. Blaurock, M., Caic, M., Okan, M., & Henkel, A. P. (2022) Robotic role theory: An integrative review of human-robot service interaction to advance role theory in the age of social robots. J. Serv. Manage., 33(6): 27–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Singelis, T. M. (1994) The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B., 20(5): 580–591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, L. M. W., Liu, M., & Ito, K. (2021) The relationship between the need to belong and nature relatedness: The moderating role of independent self-construal. Front. Psychol., 12: 638320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu, Z., Liu, F., & Chen, H. A. (2020) Warmth or competence? The influence of advertising appeal and selfconstrual on consumer-brand identification and purchase intention. Acta. Psychol. Sin., 52(3): 357–370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991) Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. J. Marketing. Res., 28(3): 307–319. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hsieh, M. H., Li, X. B., Jain, S. P., & Swaminathan, V. (2021) Self-construal drives preference for partner and servant brands. J. Bus. Res., 129: 183–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54(6): 1063–1070. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Y., & Wang, S. (2023) The influence of anthropomorphic appearance of artificial intelligence products on consumer behavior and brand evaluation under different product types. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 74: 103432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.