EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 565 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 565 (2024) 02024 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 565, 2024
2024 5th International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS2024)
Article Number 02024
Number of page(s) 7
Section Cultural Tourism Management and Business Innovation Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456502024
Published online 09 September 2024
  1. W. Yu, “Promoting cultural self-confidence and self-reliance in the new era,” New Horizons, vol. 3, pp. 5–12, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Rong, “Study on the Path of Red Culture Transmission in Xuzhou Section of the Grand Canal from the Perspective of Cultural Gene,” Journal of Yanbian College of Education, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1–3, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. D. Allen, “On actor-network theory and landscape,” Area, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 274–280, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Dalglish, “Archaeology and landscape ethics,” World Archaeol., vol. 44, pp. 327–341, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. H. Fredheim and M. Khalaf, “The significance of values: heritage value typologies re-examined,” Int. J. Herit. Stud., vol. 22, pp. 466–481, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Harvey, “Landscape and heritage: trajectories and consequences,” Landsc. Res., vol. 40, pp. 911–924, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Macpherson, “Non-representational approaches to body-landscape relations: body-landscape relations,” Geogr. Compass, vol. 4, pp. 1–13, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Z. Yang, Y. P. Yang, and G. M. Li, “A Study on the transformation and upgrading of Historical and cultural districts in Shaoxing under the background of Yangtze River Delta integration,” Jingu Wenchuang, vol. 22-23, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. S. Al-hagla, “Sustainable urban development in historical areas using the tourist trail approach: a case study of the Cultural Heritage and Urban Development (CHUD) project in Saida, Lebanon,” Cities, vol. 27, pp. 234–248, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Yang, “Integration and Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage Resources under the Perspective of Digital Humanities,” Office Automation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 3–10, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Hou, “Research on urban space theory based on cultural ecology--Tianjin, Qingdao, Dalian as examples,” New Architecture, vol. 3, pp. 34–45, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Bailey, C. Booth-Kurpnieks, K. Davies, and I. Delsante, “Cultural Ecology and Cultural Critique,” Arts, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 166–179, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. C. Gunn and M. C. Gunn, “Cultural Ecology: a Brief Overview,” The Nebraska Anthropologist, vol. 5, pp. 18–27, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. O. Frake, “Cultural Ecology and Ethnography,” American Anthropologist, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 1962. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Jiang and J. Lei, “In-depth consciousness of rural red cultural resources inheritance and innovation - A. survey based on Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University’s ‘Red Tibet’ practice group,” Party and Government Cadre Forum, vol. 10, pp. 4–10, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Namugenyi, S. L. Nimmagadda, and T. Reiners, “Design of a SWOT analysis model and its evaluation in diverse digital business ecosystem contexts,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 159, pp. 1145–1154, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Zhan, J. Huang, C. Wang, and P. Liu, “A threedimensional digital presentation of red tourism resources based on landscape gene theory: The former residence of Mao Zedong and Yang Kaihui in Qingshuitang,” Journal of Tourism, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 54–64, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Liu and Y. Qiu, “System Innovation and Improvement Suggestions of Administrative Public Interest Litigation on Red Cultural Heritage Protection,” Journal of Shihezi University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 55–62, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Liu, “Nanxiong red cultural resources protection and utilisation status quo and innovation path exploration,” Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 98–105, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  20. T. S. Terkenli, “Research advances in tourismlandscape interrelations: an editorial,” Land, vol. 10, no. 944, pp. 5–15, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Antrop, “Why landscapes of the past are important for the future,” Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 70, pp. 21–34, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Li and L. Mao, “Spatial characteristics of suburban villages based on spatial syntax,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14195, pp. 1–16, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Wrbka, K.-H. Erb, N. B. Schulz, J. Peterseil, C. Hahn, and H. Haberl, “Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators,” Land Use Pol., vol. 21, pp. 289–306, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Zhang, Z. Lian, and Y. Xu, “Combining GPS and space syntax analysis to improve understanding of visitor temporal-spatial behaviour: a case study of the Lion Grove in China,” Landsc. Res., vol. 45, pp. 534–546, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. S. Al-hagla, “Sustainable urban development in historical areas using the tourist trail approach: a case study of the Cultural Heritage and Urban Development (CHUD) project in Saida, Lebanon,” Cities, vol. 27, pp. 234–248, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Harvey, “Landscape and heritage: trajectories and consequences,” Landsc. Res., vol. 40, pp. 911–924, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.