EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 569 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 569 (2024) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Geosynthetic Properties 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456901001
Published online 19 September 2024
  1. J. G. Zornberg, G. H. Roodi, and R. Gupta, J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 143, 10 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Subramanian, and J. G. Zornberg, Predicted performance of geogrid-stabilized unbound aggregate layers using confined soil-geosynthetic composite stiffness, in Geosynthetics: Leading the Way to a Resilient Planet, Rome, Italy (2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Alfaro, N. Miura, and D. Bergado, Geotech. Test. J. 18, 2, (1995). [Google Scholar]
  4. L. S. Calvarano, Behavior of Different Geogrids under Static and Cyclic Pullout Conditions (In Italian: Comportamento di Differenti Geogriglie in Condizione di Sfilamento Statico e Ciclico), PhD Dissertation, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Italy, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. L. S. Calvarano, G. Cardile, N. Moraci, and P. G. Recalcati, The influence of reinforcement geometry and soil types on the interface behaviour in pullout conditions, in Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Geosynthetics, Spain, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Cardile, N. Moraci, and L. S. Calvarano, Geosynth. Int. 23, 3 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. J. Goodhue, T. B. Edil, and C. H. Benson, Reuse of foundry sands in reinforced earthen structures, Environmental Geotechnics Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Research Report Report 98–16 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. L. Lopes, and M. Ladeira, Geotext. Geomembr. 14, 10, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Moraci, D. Gioffre’, G. Romano, F. Montanelli, and P. Rimoldi, Pullout behaviour of geogrid embedded in granular soils in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Moraci, and P. Recalcati, Geotext. Geomembr. 24, 4 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Pant, G. V. Ramana, M. Datta, and S. K. Gupta, J. Clean. Prod 232 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Pant, M. Datta, G. V. Ramana, and D. Bansal, Measurement, 148 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. P. S. Prasad, and G. V. Ramana, Geotext. Geomembr. 44, 3 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. P. S. Prasad, and G. V. Ramana, Geotext. Geomembr. 44, 4 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. D. M. Raju, and R. J. Fannin, Can. Geotech. J., 35 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. H. Roodi, Analytical, Experimental, and Field Evaluations of Soil-Geosynthetic Interaction under Small Displacements, PhD, The University of Texas at Austin, USA (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. C. C. F. Sieira, D. M. S. Gerscovich, and A. S. F. J. Sayão, Geotext. Geomembr., 27, 4 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. H. C. Teixeira, A soil-geogrid interaction study on pullout tests and its application on analysis and designing of reinforced soil structures (In Portugese: Estudo da interação solo-geogrelha em testes de arrancamento e a sua aplicação na análise e dimensionamento de maciços reforçados) PhD, University of São Paulo, Brazil (2003) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. R. Abdi, and H. Mirzaeifar, Soils Found. 57, 6 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. D. N. Moriasi, J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith, Trans. ASABE. 50, 3 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Saltelli et al., Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer, 1st ed. Wiley (2007) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. J. Santner, B. J. Williams, and W. I. Notz, The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. A. Snyman, and D. N. Wilke, Practical Mathematical Optimization (Springer International Publishing) (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S.J. Van Der Walt, Nat. Methods 17 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Li, H. Rabitz, P.E. Yelvington, O.O. Oluwole, F. Bacon, C.E. Kolb, J. Schoendorf, J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 19 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Saltelli, Comput. Phys. Commun.. 145, 2 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  27. M. R. Dyer, Observations of the stress distribution in crushed glass with applications to soil reinforcement, PhD, University of Oxford, Oxford, (1985) [Google Scholar]
  28. R. W. Sarsby, The influence of aperture size/particle size on the efficiency of grid reinforcement, in Proceedings of the second Canadian symposium on geotextiles and geomembranes (1985) [Google Scholar]
  29. S. F. Brown, J. Kwan, and N. H. Thom, Geotext. Geomembr. 25, 6 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  30. B. Han, J. Ling, X. Shu, H. Gong, and B. Huang, Constr. Build. Mater. 158 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.