Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Leak Location in Liners
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456904001
Published online 19 September 2024
  1. D.W. Schultz, B.M. Duff, and W.R. Peters, Electrical Resistivity Technique to Assess the Integrity of Geomembrane Liners, US EPA Document EPA-600/S2-84-180 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Nosko, and J. Crowther, Can the Holy Grail of the Geosynthetics Industry “Zero Leakage” be Achieved by Arc Testing? Proceedings of the Geosynthetics 2015 Conference, February 15-18, Portland, OR, USA (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. ASTM D7909, Standard Guide for Placement of Intentional Leaks During Electrical Leak Location Surveys of Geomembranes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2021) [Google Scholar]
  4. ASTM D8265, Standard Practices for Electrical Methods for Mapping Leaks in Installed Geomembranes, ASTM International West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. ASTM D7953, Standard Practice for Electrical Leak Location on Exposed Geomembranes Using the Arc Testing Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. ASTM D7007, Standard Practices for Electrical Methods for Locating Leaks in Geomembranes Covered with Water or Earthen Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. ASTM D7002, Standard Practice for Electrical Leak Location on Exposed Geomembranes Using the Water Puddle Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2022) [Google Scholar]
  8. ASTM D7703, Standard Practice for Electrical Leak Location on Exposed Geomembranes Using the Water Lance Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2022) [Google Scholar]
  9. ASTM D7240, Standard Practice for Electrical Leak Location using Geomembranes with an Insulating Layer in Intimate Contact with a Conductive Layer via Electrical Capacitance Technique (Conductive-Backed Geomembrane Spark Test,) ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Charpentier, A. Gilson-Beck, and M. Kemnitz, Comparative Analysis Electrical Leak Location Methods on Exposed Geomembranes, Proceedings of the Geosynthetics 2023 Conference, February 5-8, Kansas City, MO, USA (2023) [Google Scholar]
  11. ASTM D6747, Standard Guide for Selection of Techniques for Electrical Leak Location of Leaks in Geomembranes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2021) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Gilson-Beck, and R. Thiel, Increasing the Sensitivity of the Dipole Method: A Case Study, Proceedings of the Geosynthetics 2023 Conference, February 5-8, Kansas City, MO, USA (2023) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Garcia, and A. Lara, Electrical Leak Detection Surveys for Brine Ponds in SQM, Chile, Proceedings of IFAI Geosynthetics Conference, Long Beach, CA, USA (2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.