Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 13001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Sustainability | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456913001 | |
| Published online | 19 September 2024 | |
- N. Dixon, G. Fowmes, and M. Frost. Global challenges, geosynthetic solutions and counting carbon. Geosynthetics International, 24(5), 451–464 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Miyata, R.J. Bathurst, and T.M. Allen. Evaluation of tensile load model accuracy for PET strap MSE walls. Geosynthetics International, 25(6), 656–671 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I.P. Damians, R.J. Bathurst, E.G. Adroguer, A. Josa, and A. Lloret. Environmental assessment of earth retaining wall structures. Environmental Geotechnics, 4(6), 415–431 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Stucki, S. Büsser, R. Itten, R. Frischknecht and H. Wallbaum. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Geosynthetics versus Conventional Construction Materials. European Association of Geosynthetics Manufacturers, ESU-services, Uster, ETH Zürich, Switzerland (2011). [Google Scholar]
- S.D. Rafalko, J.E. Sankey and N. Freitag. Sustainability measures for MSE walls and baseline environmental impact evaluations. Proceedings of the 2010 Earth Retention Conference, Bellevue, Washington, USA. Geo-Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA (2010). [Google Scholar]
- G. Heerten. Reduction of climate-damaging gases in geotechnical engineering practice using geosynthetics. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 30: 43–49 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Basu, A. Misra and A.J. Puppala. Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: perspectives and review. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 52(1): 96–113 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- C.S. Vieira and P.M. Pereira. Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 103, 192–204 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E.C.G. Santos, E.M. Palmeira and R.J. Bathurst. Performance of two geosynthetic reinforced walls with recycled construction waste backfill and constructed on collapsible ground. Geosynthetics International 21(4): 256–269 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N.C. Samtani and E.A. Nowatzki. Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall Fills—A Framework for Use of Local Available Sustainable Resources (LASAR); Publication No. FHWA-HIN-21-002; U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA (2021). [Google Scholar]
- PRé sustainability B.V. SimaPro Multiuser 9.4.0.2. Amersfoort, Netherlands (2022). [Google Scholar]
- M.A.J. Huijbregts, Z.J.N. Steinmann, P.M.F. Elshout et al. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22, 138–147 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Frischknecht, N. Jungbluth, et.al. Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Final report ecoinvent 2000, Swiss Centre for LCI. Duebendorf, CH. (2003). [Google Scholar]
- G. Wernet, C. Bauer, B. Steubing, J. Reinhard, E. Moreno-Ruiz, and B. Weidema. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), pp.1218–1230 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Bennert, W. Papp, A. Maher, and N. Gucunski. Utilization of construction and demolition debris under traffic-type loading in base and subbase applications. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1714, 33–39 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Stolz, R. Frischknecht (Ed.). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Geosynthetics versus Conventional Construction Materials. Second edition. treeze Ltd. Uster. Commissioned by the European Association of Geosynthetic product Manufacturers (EAGM) (2019). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.