EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 569 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 569 (2024) 14005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 14005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Geosynthetic Clay Liners
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456914005
Published online 19 September 2024
  1. Rayhani, M. T., Rowe, R. K., Brachman, R. W. I., Take, W. A., & Siemens, G. (2011). Factors affecting GCL hydration under isothermal conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(6), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.06.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouazza, A., Ali, M. A., Gates, W. P., & Rowe, R. K. (2017). New insight on geosynthetic clay liner hydration: the key role of subsoils mineralogy. Geosynthetics International, 24(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.16.00022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradshaw, S. L., Benson, C. H., & Scalia, J. (2013). Hydration and Cation Exchange during Subgrade Hydration and Effect on Hydraulic Conductivity of Geosynthetic Clay Liners. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(4), 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000793 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Acikel, A. S., Gates, W. P., Singh, R. M., Bouazza, A., & Rowe, R. K. (2018). Insufficient initial hydration of GCLs from some subgrades: Factors and causes. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46(6), 770–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.06.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rowe, R. K. (2020). Geosynthetic clay liners: Perceptions and misconceptions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 48(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. AbdelRazek, A. Y., & Rowe, R. K. (2019). Interface transmissivity of conventional and multicomponent GCLs for three permeants. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.10.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rowe, R. K., Garcia, J. D. D., Brachman, R. W. I., & Hosney, M. S. (2019). Chemical interaction and hydraulic performance of geosynthetic clay liners isothermally hydrated from silty sand subgrade. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47(6), 740–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Silva, J. W. B., Correia, N. S., & Portelinha, F. H. M. (2022). Laboratory investigation of GCL hydration from Lateritic subsoils. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 50(5), 946–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.06.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Portelinha, F., Silva, J., & Correia, N. (2024). Moisture uptake of a nonwoven geotextile carrier-GCL from Lateritic subsoils under simulated tropical thermal conditions. Soils and Rocks, 47(1), e2024009722. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2024.009722. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guyonnet, D., Touze-Foltz, N., Norotte, V., Pothier, C., Didier, G., Gailhanou, H., Blanc, P., & Warmont, F. (2009). Performance-based indicators for controlling geosynthetic clay liners in landfill applications. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(5), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.02.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beddoe, R. A., Take, W. A., & Rowe, R. K. (2011). Water-Retention Behavior of Geosynthetic Clay Liners. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(11), 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000526 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, Y., Bouazza, A., Gates, W. P., & Rowe, R. K. (2015). Hydraulic performance of geosynthetic clay liners to sulfuric acid solutions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yesiller, N., Hanson, J. L., Risken, J. L., Benson, C. H., Abichou, T., & Darius, J. B. (2019). Hydration Fluid and Field Exposure Effects on Moisture-Suction Response of Geosynthetic Clay Liners. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 145(4), 04019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rouf, M. A., Bouazza, A., Singh, R. M., Gates, W. P., & Rowe, R. K. (2016). Water vapour adsorption and desorption in GCLs. Geosynthetics International, 23(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Anderson, R., Rayhani, M. T., & Rowe, R. K. (2012). Laboratory investigation of GCL hydration from clayey sand subsoil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 31, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.10.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sarabian, T., & Rayhani, M. T. (2013). Hydration of geosynthetic clay liners from clay subsoil under simulated field conditions. Waste Management, 33(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, 20 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of Geosynthetic Clay Liners, 4 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. Standard Test Method for Swell Index of Clay Mineral Component of Geosynthetic Clay Liners, 7 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. Standard Test Method for Fluid Loss of Clay Component of Geosynthetic Clay Liners, 7 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. Standard Practice for Conditioning and Testing Textiles, 5 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass, 7 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  23. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Index Flux Through Saturated Geosynthetic Clay Liner Specimens Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter, 8 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  24. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), 10 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  25. Acikel, A. S., Gates, W. P., Singh, R. M., Bouazza, A., Fredlund, D. G., & Rowe, R. K. (2018). Time-dependent unsaturated behaviour of geosynthetic clay liners. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55(12), 1824–1836. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.